Nov 7, 2022Weird nerds still defending this guy, when will they learn?
Nov 7, 2022·4 repliesmoshLol so there ARE limits on free speech? Meaning he lied about being an absolutist?
And If he's making you pay for it, it's not exactly free is it?
Not to mention, satire and parody are covered under free speech and the First Amendment
Impersonation is not free speech. Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
Nov 7, 2022·1 reply1887Impersonation is not free speech. Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
Lmao really wanna call parody and satire fraud now
Right wingers really just airheaded bozos
- Nov 7, 2022·3 repliesK DOG 99
Lmao really wanna call parody and satire fraud now
Right wingers really just airheaded bozos
Nobody with (Parody) in their name got banned.
Nov 7, 20221887Impersonation is not free speech. Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
Fraud
You're such a loser
Nov 7, 2022
mjpplusThe one thing that could be a lot of trouble is the verification thing.
What if someone make a twitter account as Vladimir Putin, put out some claims wanting to end the war and making it seem like he had a change of heart. Like could that not cause major issues in the world. Same with any world leader.
Feel like if that s*** did happen Elon would have no choice but to backtrack on that
It will have no meaning and therefore it will have no worth and people will stop paying.
- Nov 7, 2022·1 reply1887
Nobody with (Parody) in their name got banned.
Hmmm where in the First Amendment does it say "Parody" needs to be in their twitter bio
Also this account had parody specifically in the bio and was banned. twitter.com/h3h3productions
Nov 7, 20221887Nobody with (Parody) in their name got banned.
- Nov 7, 2022·2 replies1887
Impersonation is not free speech. Fraud is not protected by the First Amendment.
Right wingers are so unfunny they can't even see the comedy in how often they move the goal posts
Nov 7, 2022Once again, people not understanding nuance
- Nov 7, 2022mosh
Right wingers are so unfunny they can't even see the comedy in how often they move the goal posts
They stand for absolutely nothing except oppressing minorities and "owning the libs"
- Nov 7, 2022
If you gonna be 1A "absolutist"
Either be that
Or shut the f*** up and say I'm a selfish hypocrite
- Nov 7, 2022·edited·2 repliesK DOG 99
Hmmm where in the First Amendment does it say "Parody" needs to be in their twitter bio
Also this account had parody specifically in the bio and was banned. https://twitter.com/h3h3productions
It needs to be in the name. If you get a noti it only shows a users Name + Tweet. People thought it was real
- Nov 7, 2022·1 reply1887· edited
It needs to be in the name. If you get a noti it only shows a users Name + Tweet. People thought it was real
@Thread_Critic_PhD
I'm curious where this policy is found in the First Amendment
- Nov 7, 2022
We doing "free speech" or we not
- Nov 7, 2022·1 replyK DOG 99
I'm curious where this policy is found in the First Amendment
- Nov 7, 2022·1 reply
Why y’all talking abt the first armendment ? Musk might be talking about free speech but at the end of the day it’s still a private company
- Nov 7, 2022Smoofer
Why y’all talking abt the first armendment ? Musk might be talking about free speech but at the end of the day it’s still a private company
Because he 1A "absolutist" so he "believes" in complete freedom of speech.... unless it hurts his feelings
- Nov 7, 2022·1 reply1887
https://constitutionallawreporter.com/amendment-01/freedom-speech/defamation/
Here
The Court pointed out several similarities between public figures and public officials – both may have the ability to influence, or are important to, public affairs. Additionally, public officials and public figures have stronger voices in the mass media than private citizens. This already gives them protection, because they the ability to counteract any defamatory statements made about them. A private individual does not have to meet the high standards set in New York Times v. Sullivan because they need more protection and are less important to be reported on.
Elon a public figure, he can get f***ed
- Nov 7, 2022·1 replyK DOG 99
The Court pointed out several similarities between public figures and public officials – both may have the ability to influence, or are important to, public affairs. Additionally, public officials and public figures have stronger voices in the mass media than private citizens. This already gives them protection, because they the ability to counteract any defamatory statements made about them. A private individual does not have to meet the high standards set in New York Times v. Sullivan because they need more protection and are less important to be reported on.
Elon a public figure, he can get f***ed
In the context of defamation actions (libel and slander) as well as invasion of privacy, a public figure cannot succeed in a lawsuit on incorrect harmful statements in the United States unless there is proof that the writer or publisher acted with actual malice by knowing the falsity or by reckless disregard for the truth.
I hope that clears it up! Plus Twitter rules is twitter rules.
- Nov 7, 2022·1 replymosh
Right wingers are so unfunny they can't even see the comedy in how often they move the goal posts
It's not my fault you don't know what free speech is
- Nov 7, 20221887
In the context of defamation actions (libel and slander) as well as invasion of privacy, a public figure cannot succeed in a lawsuit on incorrect harmful statements in the United States unless there is proof that the writer or publisher acted with actual malice by knowing the falsity or by reckless disregard for the truth.
I hope that clears it up! Plus Twitter rules is twitter rules.
Ah exactly
Private companies can do what they want when I agree with them
Got it
- Nov 7, 2022·1 reply
Right wingers really the s*** stains of this planet
- Nov 7, 2022K DOG 99
Right wingers really the s*** stains of this planet
Everyone is protected from defamation. Public figures need to prove it was done with malice intent, which is why parody is allowed. If your brain is functional you can tell why seeing notifications like these could be chaotic.
Nov 7, 2022That's more of a technical fix than anything...