Reply
  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply

    If these bozos really cared about free speech being protected on these platforms they would push to nationalize social media companies. That way they'd be obligated to uphold the 1st amendment.

  • Marble

    Not censoring at all is different from banning certain people. Twitter has not been doing good for years now, a change in direction isn’t unthinkable

    The world is crayz so it's not outside of the realm of possibilities but it's not gonna change to any significant degree without a change of hearts of an absolute majority, 9% isn't enough for that

  • D Dot

    “It’s only 9%”

    This is why y’all shouldn’t speak on topics that you aren’t familiar with.

    Stop being obtuse it's not about how much money the shares are it's about whether he can singlehandedly overhaul twitter's policy on censorship, which he won't

  • 0 👀
    OP
    Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply

    Yes, surely he just bought so much of the company he's been criticizing, only to not to change it.

    That makes sense.

  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply
    0

    Yes, surely he just bought so much of the company he's been criticizing, only to not to change it.

    That makes sense.

    Ofc he'll make changes with his ownership (not for the better btw), but 9% just not enough to completely overhaul their policy

  • 0 👀
    OP
    Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Ofc he'll make changes with his ownership (not for the better btw), but 9% just not enough to completely overhaul their policy

    If he wanted to "completely overhaul" it he would have made his own service.

  • Apr 4
    ·
    3 replies

    Can he acquire some b****es next

  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    First of all: doubt

    Second of all, it's still only 9%, realistically the only thing that's gonna happen is now he got his name and his pockets attached to the libtard sjw censorship

    9% will get you in the boardroom discussions

  • FIFTY HOMMY

    Can he acquire some b****es next

  • Mr C 🏰
    Apr 4

    Scary

  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Don't get me wrong it's a lot but not enough to overhaul twitter's tos

    9% gives you a lot of say/influence. You literally need to file with the SEC for 5% ownership or more. Many CEOs because of dilution dont even own 9% of shares.

  • TikTokNiga

    9% gives you a lot of say/influence. You literally need to file with the SEC for 5% ownership or more. Many CEOs because of dilution dont even own 9% of shares.

    But that's CEOs, of course the CEO has more executive influence lol

    Elon will have more influence on who gets into the board than anybody else, but again, it's still 9%

  • Trumps getting unbanned

  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply

    Holy s*** this is epic💪

    We did it reddit!

    I hope he allows us to transfer our Reddit gold over to twitter 🔥

  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply

    He filed a 13-F, this specific type of filing means he's not looking to take a controlling stake or make any decisions, it's all optics lmao.

    To be fair, no one reads these days so its a good play on his part

  • Don't really care about the free speech stuff or whatever his motive is but I think this is good for the growth of Twitter. I think it is prob the best social media platform out and is the best for growing your business, organic reach, etc. think it's better than fb and insta

  • CKL Nightman

    Holy s*** this is epic💪

    We did it reddit!

    I hope he allows us to transfer our Reddit gold over to twitter 🔥

  • this man will do everything but pay taxes

  • if it's actually 9% exactly this makes him the biggest shareholder in the company, even more than Vanguard and Blackrock

  • twitter don't even makes money like that lmao

  • Fantasy ♥️
    Apr 4
    bad time to be wok

    twitter don't even makes money like that lmao

    I don’t think Elon cares about the money from Twitter, I think he cares more about it on a personal level tbh

  • Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply
    NewChoppa

    He filed a 13-F, this specific type of filing means he's not looking to take a controlling stake or make any decisions, it's all optics lmao.

    To be fair, no one reads these days so its a good play on his part

    Do you mean 13G

  • Fantasy ♥️
    Apr 4
    ·
    1 reply
    0

    If he wanted to "completely overhaul" it he would have made his own service.

    Why make your own platform when Twitter already has billions registered users b

  • Fantasy ♥️
    Apr 4
    ·
    2 replies
    Level 5 Goblin

    If these bozos really cared about free speech being protected on these platforms they would push to nationalize social media companies. That way they'd be obligated to uphold the 1st amendment.

    You want a free speech platform to be controlled by the government

  • Apr 4
    ·
    2 replies

    I love how these clowns talk about free speech that and free speech this. Nigga you have free speech, because the government knows what you're saying either doesn't mean s*** or helps them continue to divide the working class. Anyone that said anything worth a damn was killed by the CIA.