where you getting these quotes?

!dream undiscovered deep sea creature

"Moving from knowing to not knowing
this is good.

Moving from not knowing to knowing
this is sickness.

You have to become sick of your sickness before you can get rid of it.

The sage isn't sick.
He's sick of his sickness.
Therefore he's not sick."

Well now it's discovered

Nice lighting

Nice book

The sea is vast...

Many things to see, more to do.

Virtually Limitless.

Don't loose it to the self.

Awesome thread

Is this aquatic enough

Oceanplugg the new wave

It's like coming out of a thunderstorm riding on Lugia with 16 bit graphics

sounds amazing lol

@Womanpuncher69

Thoughts?

overall i agree always views freedom as someone who has control over the options they have and the ability to make a clear decision to carry out

otherwise without this control to do or not to do anything you just become slave to the various external influences acting on you

Fish are stupid and cant think

What is the correlation between think and intelligence?

"As a unifying discourse the literary standpoint is also flawed. Its chief problem is its inability to exit from the self-created prison of the text. Here the answer to the Cartesian dilemma of doubt is a singular moment of certainty: there is text. This moment rapidly gives way, however, to the redoubt that the conclusion is a textual strategy In the end, there is nothing outside of text, and most cogently, no promise of anything we might call a science. As a human scientist one could scarcely take an interest in poverty, conflict, the economy, history, government, and so on, for these are but terms lodged within a textual-rhetorical history. There is no social critique to be made, nothing to resist, nothing to champion, and, indeed, no action to be taken, for the very idea of "action to be taken" is an extension of linguistic convention. In addition to the unrelievable torpor invited by such a conclusion, literary-rhetorical a***ysis in its pure form can offer no account of human communication. Not only is doubt cast on the very idea of communication (it is simply a term within texts), but if we understand only through linguistic convention, there is no means of comprehending anyone who does not participate in the same conventions. In effect, authen- tic understanding can only take place with someone who is identical to oneself. "

"The terms and forms by which we achieve understanding of the world and ourselves are social artifacts products of historically and culturally situated interchanges among people. For constructionists, descriptions and explanations are neither driven by the world as it is, nor are they the inexorable outcome of genetic or structural propensities within the individual. Rather, they are the result of human coordination of action. Words take on their meaning only within the context of ongoing relationships. They are, in Shotter's (1984) terms, the result not of individual action and reaction but of joint-action. Or, in Bakhtin's (1981) sense, words are inherently "inter individual." This means that to achieve intelligibility is to participate in a reiterative pattern of relationship, or if sufficiently extended, a tradition t is only by virtue of sustaining some form of past relationship that we can make sense at all. And in this way, intelligible accounts of the world and the self are everywhere and at all times constrained."