Apr 19, 2023·edited·2 replies
HaroldsChickennot streaming isn't classism and elitism
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUbTF0Dc2bo&ab_channel=Bj%C3%B6rkBR
a 46 song set from 5 months ago is up. She could easily request to take this down if she was "elitist " and "classist"
she creates a show she wants people to be at. I personally don't think every artist should or has to be required to stream be it festival, their own personal show or album premiere. Obviously its more accessible and they should make clear what their plans are early so we know if they are streaming but they don't owe us that to me
it's not as bad as bjork because she's doing pretty much the same show and the show is available to see as you posted (although the Coachella performance was a bit different) but the problem is they were both announced to be streaming then taken off last minute like tf. im not saying they owe it either but yeah lol but it's sus for them to go out of their way to refuse like frank did
Apr 19, 2023·1 reply
BIG STEPPER BRODIEI mean there’s just no way next weekend happens right
Its happening trust and believe
Apr 19, 20232000
- Apr 19, 2023
2000 !!
- Apr 19, 2023
Wild
- Apr 19, 2023supermodel· edited
it's not as bad as bjork because she's doing pretty much the same show and the show is available to see as you posted (although the Coachella performance was a bit different) but the problem is they were both announced to be streaming then taken off last minute like tf. im not saying they owe it either but yeah lol but it's sus for them to go out of their way to refuse like frank did
I think bjork heard frank wasnt streaming and was like oh f*** yes and joined it, also the show isnt the exactl same
Apr 19, 2023HaroldsChickennot streaming isn't classism and elitism
!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUbTF0Dc2bo&ab_channel=Bj%C3%B6rkBR a 46 song set from 5 months ago is up. She could easily request to take this down if she was "elitist " and "classist"
she creates a show she wants people to be at. I personally don't think every artist should or has to be required to stream be it festival, their own personal show or album premiere. Obviously its more accessible and they should make clear what their plans are early so we know if they are streaming but they don't owe us that to me
the last few years has poisoned the minds of even the people I agree with politically, everyone is just so f***ing annoying about this s*** and applies it to the wrong stuff all the time
hayabusa 🌐Apr 19, 2023coat
- Apr 19, 2023CutiePieHole
Its happening trust and believe
- Apr 19, 2023
2000
Apr 19, 20232k
- Apr 19, 2023supermodel· edited
it's not as bad as bjork because she's doing pretty much the same show and the show is available to see as you posted (although the Coachella performance was a bit different) but the problem is they were both announced to be streaming then taken off last minute like tf. im not saying they owe it either but yeah lol but it's sus for them to go out of their way to refuse like frank did
Coachella announcing them as streaming appears to have not be a choice so much as Coachella like Lolla always announces it like all artist are streaming
- Apr 19, 2023·1 replysupermodel
she catching heat for not streaming either, check her insta comments. i fw bjork but i keep the same energy, if the tech exists to share your performance and you say no it's just classism and elitism, nothing else 😂 i mean if Jai streamed his s*** then anyone can. this idea that streaming it somehow removes some spirit from it or something is bullshit. people are gonna record it anyway too.
Real s***
The fact I can’t pay a monthly fee to just watch concerts from my house yet is stupid as f*** - Apr 19, 2023·2 repliesGrok
Real s***
The fact I can’t pay a monthly fee to just watch concerts from my house yet is stupid as f***I’d pay 25-30 a month for
Archive concert footage
Coachella x rolling loud type streams for concerts all over the country - Apr 19, 2023·2 replies
When an artist tours we don't expect them to stream on their own tour so why on a festival are we like "yeah you got to "
Apr 19, 2023little demon so soon!
Apr 19, 2023the way that every time i check itt, i see new dumb s*** i couldnt ever imagine being said smfh
- Apr 19, 2023Grok
I’d pay 25-30 a month for
Archive concert footage
Coachella x rolling loud type streams for concerts all over the countryInitially only a couple cities can adopt the infrastructure to do it
Like the one Abel did in California for HBO and probably MSG can already do this
So you start streaming people playing there and eventually branch out to like legendary venues in Europe and Asia and around the world
- Apr 19, 2023Grok
I’d pay 25-30 a month for
Archive concert footage
Coachella x rolling loud type streams for concerts all over the countryfr i would pay money to stream concerts/virtual tickets no problem, especially if it's to the artist themselves if they're independent.
- Apr 19, 2023·1 replyHaroldsChicken
When an artist tours we don't expect them to stream on their own tour so why on a festival are we like "yeah you got to "
because the festival is advertising it dude
I don't think it's unreasonable. also I pretty much made peace with the fact that Frank would most likely not livestream his s*** when it was first announced like 3-4 years ago until I literally saw it on the streaming schedule, it's not like I was demanding this, it was advertised and then rugpulled lmfaoo. can't blame people for being upset because of that key reason. iwas exaggerating a bit with the first post talm bout classism but it's still really suspect to outright refuse when the festival is gonna livestream it for you at no extra cost to you - Apr 19, 2023
to think, paradiso amsterdam used to put up all their concerts up for free
Apr 19, 20232k
Beamo23 🍸Apr 19, 2023deleteduser2863
Is this the ankle doctor?
- Apr 19, 2023·1 replysupermodel
because the festival is advertising it dude
I don't think it's unreasonable. also I pretty much made peace with the fact that Frank would most likely not livestream his s*** when it was first announced like 3-4 years ago until I literally saw it on the streaming schedule, it's not like I was demanding this, it was advertised and then rugpulled lmfaoo. can't blame people for being upset because of that key reason. iwas exaggerating a bit with the first post talm bout classism but it's still really suspect to outright refuse when the festival is gonna livestream it for you at no extra cost to youI get people being upset what I am getting at partially is it doesn't even seem like Coachella communicated with Frank or Bjork about the option of not streaming or even possibly thought a artist would perform without streaming.
It's not about extra cost its simply about how someone wants to present their show.
I see both sides on that is all I am saying.