i mean you can ? Just because he's infrequent with performing doesn't mean he'll be unaffected.

would be unnecessarily petty, Ye f***ed with their money last year and they said they were understanding that it was best for him not to perform, I think they'll take the same approach to Frank

blink 182 is literally 50 years olds singing decades old poppunk hits bout losing virginity. such a bad replacement

Lol if he wants to tour and is physically mentally vocally able he will do fine

It most certainly would be.

We just saw a Gwyneth Paltrow lawsuit that was for the amount of $1 be public information.

A Coachella lawsuit would be major news and would make waves in the music industry

I don't think it was an evil plan but i think he's liable for 80/90% alot of this comes down to simply communicating

Not everything is public my guy.

Just watched this. Wow was it bad. I mean what few songs he did were nice but wtf was that. I’m almost glad he’s not there for weekend 2. Idk if I’ll go see blink 182 but I’ll figure something out. Sad thing I shoulda seen this coming

No, you can’t. Y’all think life is an episode of succession.

A COACHELLA LAWSUIT would CERTAINLY be PUBLIC

Do y’all not understand the effects that would have on the music industry

Blond didn’t go public. Frank hid that pretty damn well.

I would say this is different, this was three years in the making and he made a personal agreement with the CEO

Niggas having mock trials itt

I think he tried to honor his contract rather than cancelling . Again if he sings more songs and gets on stage on time I think the performance significantly better . Stream or not it would be much better with a hour more of songs . Alternate versions and dj set was a risk but I liked it

If Coachella ever sued an artist it would be major news. That’s not an opinion, that’s a fact

Please stop …

Plus The anticipation for Frank Ocean’s highly anticipated return to be at Coachella alone sells tickets. So I mean people are def not happy.

Lauryn Hill would have negative money if what you were saying was true

what was so personal about this agreement, isnt every agreement between an artist and CEO personal, I don't see anything coming from this

last post before you guys can go back to defending this piece of s***!

frank was the biggest draw. millions in revenue generated off him performing two full sets. GV got half of one set. that right there is a breach of contract. the fact that this is confusing to yall is embarrassing.

going further, do you think frank paid out of pocket for the months of training 120 ice skaters or the ice rink? all the sunken cost and time going to needless waste is fraudulent.

then you have frank damaging GV and Coachella’s public image and reputation, including the aspect of forcing them to cancel the live stream they had been promoting.

i’m done spoon feeding you now

They really saying this man should be sued because they put on a performance he didn’t like

Now that’s entitlement

i don't but we are talking about someone who finessed the music industry once (That we all support him doing so!) but the internal grumblings were loud after he did that s***. Yes he's independent. No he doesn't need golden voice to tour. But i think its a bit foolish to think nothing will happen at all form this

Lol I felt bad for all of 10 seconds for saying “ I hope y’all don’t get a new album “ but now I don’t