Don't have the time to dig that up right now I got a psychometrics exam tomorrow but pretty much the whole Cold War boiled down to economic interests, in the long term not short term
This becomes even spicier when the NATO nations had higher standards of living
Their economic interests clearly aligned with higher quality of life
This becomes even spicier when the NATO nations had higher standards of living
Their economic interests clearly aligned with higher quality of life
I'm sure that's the only variable that played a part
i was gonna call u out for name calling but i just called op a clown a few minutes ago so
I found that to be very rude by the way
If you're arguing that they didn't want the communist politcal system to spread because it's supposedly inherently undemocratic then you're wrong, because they also opposed socialist governments that played by all the rules of liberal democracy.
It was all about economic interests, it was just always presented as a fight for "freedom", but that's just propaganda.
ok your saying the same thing as me bro, your just phrasing the end means as capital gain (which it is)
but its capital gain as a result of the political system chosen (capitalism) therefore its a political decision
an economic decision would be an embargo because cuba is better at producing certain goods
like you have the right concept but you're dying on a hill because of semantics
ok your saying the same thing as me bro, your just phrasing the end means as capital gain (which it is)
but its capital gain as a result of the political system chosen (capitalism) therefore its a political decision
an economic decision would be an embargo because cuba is better at producing certain goods
like you have the right concept but you're dying on a hill because of semantics
I could repeat that last sentence to you also lol
But sure our disagreement is semantic, I actually disagreed with that other poster on the substance tho
I could repeat that last sentence to you also lol
But sure our disagreement is semantic, I actually disagreed with that other poster on the substance tho
yeah whatever small disagreement free cuba
yeah whatever small disagreement free cuba
Free cuba = be forced to pay "reparations" to all the US companies who turned it into a banana republic, to descendants of Spanish colonizers, supporting the wholesale pillaging of Cuba and the rewarding of people who owed their wealth to either the colonial power of Spain or the corrupt favors of U.S. puppet regimes back in the 1940s and 50s.
Yes the USA still wants reparations for what happened 70 years ago. One funny thing is that when expropriations happened in the initial stage of the revolution, the Cuban government paid to all owners: Canadian, Spanish, etc, and the U.S. started to screech, and instead of accepting the money, they said that those things were theirs, and until this day they keep that idiotic idea.
Haiti had to pay reparations to France, the US wants the same from Cuba
OH and the fact that cuba doesn't really provide anything to america is also a reason why america put embargos
Troll
OH and the fact that cuba doesn't really provide anything to america is also a reason why america put embargos
LMAO
OH and the fact that cuba doesn't really provide anything to america is also a reason why america put embargos
ok dis classic
OH and the fact that cuba doesn't really provide anything to america is also a reason why america put embargos
That doesn't make a lot of sense my bro.
The embargoes on Cuba were literally put in place to restrict their access to capitalist markets after the revolution created social ownership of land which greatly affected Cuba's prior trade relationships with the U.S. (largely concerning the island's sugar market and exports).
The U.S. put embargoes on Cuba, outlawed all banks headquartered or parented in America from interacting with Cuba's economy, manipulated international commerce by rejecting trade contracts with any foreign merchants who engaged with Cuban trade, and persuaded other European countries to stop investing in Cuba's economy — all after the revolution decreased America's sizeable control over Cuban capital.
okay so the initlal embargos (weapons embargo) were not put in place to limit their access to the markets, they were put in place because they broke their treaty, during the batista vs fidel conflict. (this embargo btw helped fidel win)
i dont disagree embargos were put to limit cuba's market but these things happened due to political reasons, which is what my point has been.
That doesn't make a lot of sense my bro.
yes it literally does, its a pretty big reason america still has the embargos active.
america gains nothing, but theres big drawbacks. cuban-americans right now in america protest anything that is in support of cuba. as more generations of cuban-americans are born in america, i think it it will be lifted. but this should make sense
I love when some story like this becomes the flavor of the week on social media and all of the IG thots start posting “Help Cuba! 💙”
like what exactly do you want us to do about this situation 😂
yes it literally does, its a pretty big reason america still has the embargos active.
america gains nothing, but theres big drawbacks. cuban-americans right now in america protest anything that is in support of cuba. as more generations of cuban-americans are born in america, i think it it will be lifted. but this should make sense
Maybe I misunderstand, but if the USA imposes an embargo on Cuba for not providing anything to the USA, why doesn't it impose an embargo on for example Iceland? Or Thailand?
Maybe I misunderstand, but if the USA imposes an embargo on Cuba for not providing anything to the USA, why doesn't it impose an embargo on for example Iceland? Or Thailand?
i misspoke when i posted that comment, i meant to say it’s the reason why america doesn’t lift the embargo’s.
i even said what i meant after
i misspoke when i posted that comment, i meant to say it’s the reason why america doesn’t lift the embargo’s.
i even said what i meant after
Oh I apologize in all honesty I usually just read the posts responding to me or some posts when I have some time on my hands.
I have to say I kind of disagree with that statement still. I'm pretty sure the reason why the US has an embargo on Cuba is to ends it's one party state and dictatorship, similar to North Korea. (correct me if I'm wrong.)
Oh I apologize in all honesty I usually just read the posts responding to me or some posts when I have some time on my hands.
I have to say I kind of disagree with that statement still. I'm pretty sure the reason why the US has an embargo on Cuba is to ends it's one party state and dictatorship, similar to North Korea. (correct me if I'm wrong.)
that's a reason as well , but that also plays into the fact that america doesn't really have anything to gain from it.
these issues are NEVER black and white theres also multiple reasons why things happen, so ye.