I personally prefer to let idiots be idiots and believe what they want to believe.
If you’re stupid enough to believe everything you read on the internet without doing any sort of research and fact checking of your own then so be it.
I rather put more resources into pre school and elementary school programs so we can fix the problem at the root rather than try to control what content adults can see.
Smarter kids = smarter adults = less idiots on social media
the way things are going now, we won't see smarter kids = smarter adults = less idiots on social media in our lifetime. maybe things will get better long after we're gone. social media and videos that ppl consume at an unhealthy rate, ppl are obsessed with mindless stupid content.
ppl will see s*** on sm and regardless if it's factual or not will run with it and tell their friends/family what they saw and treat it as fact when really it's just misinformation
Community notes really slapped the dumbass in chief (really they’re interns typing shyt at gunpoint)
Barely use twitter anymore place is a klan rally now
For months I get notifications for the most f***ed up s***. Why. I don't get it
I'm glad you brought this up, and I agree to an extent.
Education (or lack thereof) seems to be an important factor in this issue.
To clarify, do you think a higher quality of education would significantly help improve the quality of information and discourse on social media?
Anecdotally, I know many people who could be considered smart by conventional standards, but they are just as tightly wound to the dynamic of social media as others.
When you say:
"If you’re stupid enough to believe everything you read on the internet without doing any sort of research and fact checking of your own then so be it."
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but do the majority of people on social media fact-check the information they have read? If not, wouldn't it be unfair to neglect this aspect?
I think there’s a point where most people will read something and if they care about it on any significant level they’ll check out more opinions or do some more reading about it from different perspectives. But most people do not care enough about many topics to do that so whatever they see or read most recently is what they believe.
I would actually argue that the echo chamber aspect of social media is actually much more dangerous than the misinformation part.
It’s like once you go down that route the algorithm adjusts so that it only shows you misinformation. It no longer presents opposing views and other literature because it’s just showing you things that affirm whatever beliefs you already have.
If I could fix anything about social media I’d probably pick that
I definitely do think that a more educated society = less misinformation as a whole tho
the way things are going now, we won't see smarter kids = smarter adults = less idiots on social media in our lifetime. maybe things will get better long after we're gone. social media and videos that ppl consume at an unhealthy rate, ppl are obsessed with mindless stupid content.
Oh yea it’s bleak rn. Especially after Covid. America was never a highly educated country and Covid made it even worse for gen z.
It is what it is tho. It will take a long time but you have to start at the root eventually otherwise the probably will never actually be fixed.
We need huge educational reform in this country starting at kindergarten
I support social media censorship in regards to misinformation
Discuss
sorry op but i think this is a s*** take
sorry op but i think this is a s*** take
wonderful contribution to the discussion thank you
wonderful contribution to the discussion thank you
of course tag me if you need my opinion again.
What are some good examples of misinformation on social media spreading and causing adverse outcomes? Like why did you take this stance in the first place
I don't even support social media tbh
KTT2, Lipstick Alley, and the P***hub comment section is where the real ones reside
What are some good examples of misinformation on social media spreading and causing adverse outcomes? Like why did you take this stance in the first place
Q Anon to Jan 6th pipeline
let’s just delete social media as a whole, we can go back to normal evolution
Pros:
Stops morons from influencing other morons
Cons:
Allows for the possibility of the government to impose greater influence on our information
Clearly this issue does not have a single correct answer, the decision must be made after weighing the qualitative values of its benefits and drawbacks
This isn't ideal, but is one of the few ways humans can create some form of structure and order.
It's not even govt control tho it's private corporate control
''fact-check'' organizations are corrupt too
The age old problem is that there are no impartial arbiters to decide what is and what isn't 'misinformation'.
Example: if you had said COVID was possibly a Chinese biolab leak in 2020 you would have been 'deamplified' or even deplatformed entirely -- now the official position of many governments is that COVID quite possibly is a Chinese biolab leak.
When it comes to information, it's better to have a demolition derby with the most truthful ideas surviving the dogpile than bureaucrats and partisan 'fact checkers' trying to shape reality