well actually its exact. Newton's theory of gravitation states that "every particle attracts every other particle in the universe with a force which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers." so the reason the moon revolves around the earth is due to an extreme difference in its distance from the earth and the sun

if pluto were as close to the earth as it were the moon it would revolve around it instead the sun

There’s arguments for both

I find religion as a whole more endearing than science

if pluto were as close to the earth as it were the moon it would revolve around it instead of the sun

you can proof this or are just assuming again?

science is based on scientific law

theories do not necessarily change the only reason a vast amount of theories have such a name is because they cannot be practically tested

yet people with no knowledge of scientific terminology thinks this means that they are not concrete. this is false. They can be concrete on logic and scientific evidence its just that, as stated before, they can't be tested due to limits

This fake woke thread is killing me

except theories DO change
ktt2.com/impossible-black-hole-sighted-evolution-not-real-after-all-13618

So who created this law you speak of?

yes

F=Gm1m2/(r^2) is our equation, G is a gravitational constant and F is the force that the two objects have between each other. m1 is the mass of object 1, m2 is the mass of object 2, and r^2 is the square of the distances between the two objects. Given the fact that G is a constant in all cases, r^2 is a constant in this cases because we are assuming pluto is moved into the position of the moon so distance doesnt change, and m1 is a constant since the earth is gonna be the same size, that means its a simple comparison of the mass of the moon vs the mass of pluto

The mass of the moon is 7.34767309 × 10^22 kilograms, while pluto is 1.30900 × 1022

given then, the gravitational force between the two objects would be 1/7 of the force of that between the current earth and moon, so pluto would actually be in a much more unstable orbit around the earth due to being so light. However, due to its lower mass, it would actually be affected less by the force of the sun and therefore would still technically be in orbit around the earth

i never said all theories are concrete

no one, they were created at the start of the universe as "laws" which existed before human definition and study. We simply put names such as "laws" and "rules" to be able to efficiently define a set of rigid guidelines to which the universe works

Why do religious people get so defensive over online condescension from irreligious people, as if believers (or people pretending to believe) don’t control most of the important political and social institutions of the world

G most definitely isnt a given constant but ill let that slide
you wrote some letters and said “believe me its true”, but i asked if you could prove this, not give me an equation that might be mumbo jumbo for all i know

you said they dont change

G is the gravitational constant, and gravitational force itself is actually a law, unlike the theory of general relativity, which is used to define the nature of gravity, not the way it functions which is handled by the law of gravitation.

you can input the mass of any object, the height you want to drop it from, and the the mass of earth into the aforementioned equation, and you will recieve a number of newtons as your answer.

Newtons are a unit of force, with one newton defined as the amount of force required to accelerate 1kg at the speed of 1m/s per second (so essentially every second, the speed of the object increases by 1m/s every second) Drop it from that height and it will accelerate at a speed precisely a***ogous to the newton measurement that you got from your equation

i said a vast amount, even a majorty dont change not all because the only thing that disqualifies said majority of them from being law is because of an inability to be tested

you can input the mass of any object, the height you want to drop it from, and the the mass of earth into the aforementioned equation, and you will recieve a number of newtons as your answer.

exactly, G isnt a given constant it changes depending on distance from earth according to the theory of gravity because “how higher how less gravitational pull” but obviously this is all just guesswork and we cant be sure tht this is really how it works in space

G is a given constant (6.67408 × 10^-11 m^3 kg^-1 s^-2 based on this reputable government site), what changes based on height is r because r is what the distance the two objects are

And actually this equation doesnt work in practice in an atmosphere due to aerodynamics playing a part in what velocity an object can travel through once distances can get big. This equation actually works better in a vacuum like space

Some dumb niggas itt

science can be used to cope as religion would

in on a sucuk thread

Also about treating disease though

In the sense of putting your energy into one thing to keep your mind off another thing? Sure, anything can be like that. To avoid the observable truth of the world? No.

good thing im a deist and can believe in both hold your L’s