u dont even know what an assault rifle is and a "silencer" u mean suppressor
Lmao you’re really gonna argue the difference between using the word silencer and suppressor?
And I don’t know what an AR is? Based on what exactly?
Lmao you’re really gonna argue the difference between using the word silencer and suppressor?
And I don’t know what an AR is? Based on what exactly?
you realize an ar15 is not an assault rifle 💀💀
guns = leftist
america = has more guns than any country (more guns than ppl)
therefor america the most leftist country communist revolution coming any day now :pog: 💯💯
In principle yes.
But Americans love to use the 2nd amendment as an excuse for their gun fetish.
I’m fine with a gun for general protection and that’s it. You got Niggas with small arsenals talkin bout it it’s for self defense
you’re spitting with this one
guns = leftist
america = has more guns than any country (more guns than ppl)
therefor america the most leftist country communist revolution coming any day now :pog: 💯💯
you realize an ar15 is not an assault rifle 💀💀
Bro I never even typed the f***in word AR15 so why are you bringing it up?
i'm pretty ambivalent but i'm generally pro-2A.
NRA can go f*** itself though
why r u against nra?
why r u against nra?
cause they aint do s*** when (((government))) police shot a black good guy with a legally registered gun
except write a p**** ass letter
why r u against nra?
as @localblaccmane said, blatant hypocrisy and racism
in their current incarnation they're nothing more than a glorified money-laundering scheme for republicans
as @localblaccmane said, blatant hypocrisy and racism
in their current incarnation they're nothing more than a glorified money-laundering scheme for republicans
Like a very simple Google search of just "nra" will lead you to their Twitter page results where you see s*** like this
Any organization that gets a co-sign from a sack of s*** like Dinesh D'Souza is very likely not worth backing or associating with
My homie bought an AR in a walmart parking lot. That I have a problem with but otherwise I don't have a problem with the 2nd
why does someone need a gun anyways
what you gonna do start a revolution?
It's not solely a need, some people collect sneakers, books, paintings and etc. while other people like collecting guns. They don't and shouldn't have to justify it.
The 2nd Amendment should be crossed out of the Constitution and a new amendment should be written claiming that the 2nd is no longer a right in this here United States.
At the time the country was founded, it made sense coming off of terrible British rule and genocidal weapons didn't exist. To legally be allowed to be in possession of weapon that is capable of destroying dozens of human beings in seconds is asinine in today's age.
Anyone defending the 2nd amendment are nothing more than privileged white folk that have a forest for a backyard and the words guns and bullets just mean sport and hunting to them while to those from the city they mean robbery, murder, and gang violence.
Don't give me that 'to stop a bad guy with a gun you need a good guy with a gun' or that we need them to defend against the military/police or that cities with the strictest gun laws are the most deadliest, blah, blah, blah. Those have all been debunked.
There is no rational humane reason for the 2nd amendment to continue to exist.
The 2nd Amendment should be crossed out of the Constitution and a new amendment should be written claiming that the 2nd is no longer a right in this here United States.
At the time the country was founded, it made sense coming off of terrible British rule and genocidal weapons didn't exist. To legally be allowed to be in possession of weapon that is capable of destroying dozens of human beings in seconds is asinine in today's age.
Anyone defending the 2nd amendment are nothing more than privileged white folk that have a forest for a backyard and the words guns and bullets just mean sport and hunting to them while to those from the city they mean robbery, murder, and gang violence.
Don't give me that 'to stop a bad guy with a gun you need a good guy with a gun' or that we need them to defend against the military/police or that cities with the strictest gun laws are the most deadliest, blah, blah, blah. Those have all been debunked.
There is no rational humane reason for the 2nd amendment to continue to exist.
"Don't give me that 'to stop a bad guy with a gun you need a good guy with a gun' or that we need them to defend against the military/police or that cities with the strictest gun laws are the most deadliest, blah, blah, blah. Those have all been debunked."
DeBuNkEd
they haven't been "debunked"
also the 2nd protects the 1st
and u do realize minorities want to own guns to...
also america is in too deep to ban guns theres too many out there to ban the slae of them criminals will always get guns.
"Don't give me that 'to stop a bad guy with a gun you need a good guy with a gun' or that we need them to defend against the military/police or that cities with the strictest gun laws are the most deadliest, blah, blah, blah. Those have all been debunked."
DeBuNkEd
they haven't been "debunked"
also the 2nd protects the 1st
and u do realize minorities want to own guns to...
also america is in too deep to ban guns theres too many out there to ban the slae of them criminals will always get guns.
I actually agree that America is in too deep to ban guns. Guns should have been banned at the turn of the 20th century. This is why I suggest an extreme approach to banning guns; All must have their guns confiscated and if you're caught with a gun after the ban you shall be punished by death. This way possessing a gun is a literal death sentence.