kasich2028

Apr 26

·

2 replies

Reply

1

Midzy

2w

Actually, it's not even an error. The specific vinyl has an exclusive track that the other vinyl don't. Doesn't say it's not available on other formats.

"Exclusive bonus track"

But, there's plenty of info on what you're buying on the actual website anyway.

There is no need for this “argument” to go on cus he’s just arguing for the sake of argument. He has already conceded on all the facts and have yet to come back with a proper respond on the actual points.

Just a quick recap: he tried to say:

“The pt2 tracks is some sort of tactics to boost sales”, when

1. The only sales type from those would be itunes, which is only a fraction of her overall sales.

2. He refused to take me up on a bet on whether the iTunes sales would eventually be a significant number or not on the eventual Billboard article.

3. He himself suggested she could drop the pt2 CDs, which is something she could easily arrange yet never done before.

His goal is to inject his animosity rather than making a factual argument. So there’s really no reason to respond to him at all.

Midzy

Apr 26

·

1 reply

Reply

iHype

2w

Says the Vinyl disc variant is exclusive not the song, also on the prior tweet I linked they even that was the 'final edition' of the album knowing damnwell Anthology existed (+ the Target versions you are also posting yourself) lmao.

And you just posted yourself a Target Vinyl with the same bonus tracks that were 'exclusive' in her store lmaooo. So no, not even the Vinyls in her store had those 'bonus track' songs exclusively and other retailers ended up having them on their Vinyls.

Not even worth continuing this with you. It's unainmous she version-spammed with preorders and purposely mislead to some extents.

There hasn't been an edition after that.. so it's still the final edition as I'm typing this.

Half your posts are you pretending you know what's to come, and now you're grasping at straws arguing over semantics and wording of tweets.

thegreatdivine

Apr 26

Reply

iHype

Apr 26

Reply

Midzy

2w

There hasn't been an edition after that.. so it's still the final edition as I'm typing this.

Half your posts are you pretending you know what's to come, and now you're grasping at straws arguing over semantics and wording of tweets.

Target edition Vinyls dropped after, Anthology dropped after.

Half your posts are you lying or addressing misleading marketing as 'she didn't lie' when that's not even what the word misleading means.

Midzy

Apr 26

Reply

kasich2028

2w

There is no need for this “argument” to go on cus he’s just arguing for the sake of argument. He has already conceded on all the facts and have yet to come back with a proper respond on the actual points.

Just a quick recap: he tried to say:

“The pt2 tracks is some sort of tactics to boost sales”, when

1. The only sales type from those would be itunes, which is only a fraction of her overall sales.

2. He refused to take me up on a bet on whether the iTunes sales would eventually be a significant number or not on the eventual Billboard article.

3. He himself suggested she could drop the pt2 CDs, which is something she could easily arrange yet never done before.

His goal is to inject his animosity rather than making a factual argument. So there’s really no reason to respond to him at all.

It was funny how he went from she's outright scamming fans - to a***yzing tweets by Taylor Nation looking for slight discrepancies in wording.

They always do this when Taylor drops lmao

iHype

Apr 26

·

1 reply

Reply

1

kasich2028

2w

There is no need for this “argument” to go on cus he’s just arguing for the sake of argument. He has already conceded on all the facts and have yet to come back with a proper respond on the actual points.

Just a quick recap: he tried to say:

“The pt2 tracks is some sort of tactics to boost sales”, when

1. The only sales type from those would be itunes, which is only a fraction of her overall sales.

2. He refused to take me up on a bet on whether the iTunes sales would eventually be a significant number or not on the eventual Billboard article.

3. He himself suggested she could drop the pt2 CDs, which is something she could easily arrange yet never done before.

His goal is to inject his animosity rather than making a factual argument. So there’s really no reason to respond to him at all.

None of your points even go against what you claimed I said lmao.

Even if iTunes is a fraction of her sales... releasing Anthology boosts them? I never said iTunes was the majority of her sales lmao, you just tried to put that into my mouth and then make me do a bet for a statement I never said lmao.

Botney

Apr 26

Reply

iHype

2w

Why do you keep failing to comprehend what I'm saying correctly lmao.

No she didn't force anyone to buy any versions. However knowing every version youre selling in pre-orders isn't the full version the entire time and waiting til release to drop the full version (along with physicals eventually following after for that version) is a s*** precedent and something greedy. No artist should do that to their fans nor should it be encouraged lmao.

What is still not clicking

your arguments are so weak

kasich2028

Apr 26

·

edited

Reply

iHype

2w

None of your points even go against what you claimed I said lmao.

Even if iTunes is a fraction of her sales... releasing Anthology boosts them? I never said iTunes was the majority of her sales lmao, you just tried to put that into my mouth and then make me do a bet for a statement I never said lmao.

ok so do you not see how youre just injecting your spitefulness into an act that is benign then? why be SO adamant that a move which happened to bolstered tiny fraction of itunes sales HAS to be done for the sole purpose of boosting then? why cant you also give it a shot the notion that she just wanted to give people 31 songs to listen to without having to make a 4-disc vinyl?