Nice job avoiding the question. Other people had guns besides him and someone even pulled a gun on him...

The law is dependent on states but defending property with a lethal weapon isn’t unauthorized there so it’s not vigilantism. It’s stupid as hell but by law there’s nothing they can get him on.

Please cant you read? I was fully answering your question. Tell me.

What wouldve happened if it was a protester who shot 2 people?

I feel stupid explaining this to you again but apperantly once is not enough. There shouldnt be weapons on a protest. I do not know how to say it more clearly to you.

And no I do not care that its legal. This is about mine and everyone else‘s take that he is a degenerate and the laws that allowed this are ridiculous.

There's not a single state where it's legal to use guns to protect somebody else's property

crazy to think there are little boys out there not being molested because of Kyle Rittenhouse killing a hardened, convicted pedophile who tried to assault him.

i wonder if people would of viewed all this different is someone in antifa killed 2 trump supporters. i think theyd be all for it honestly. but because its flipped theres people itt saying he needs to die lmao

This thread stinks

bruh

He could make the arguement that he had family that owned a business there and he didn’t use lethal force until he was attacked and genuinely in danger.
In New York you can defend your business if it’s under the threat of burglarizing. I’m not sure which other states

He didn’t know he was a pedophile when he shot him lol
Don’t make him a hero lol

"How did he go there with the intention of doing harm? Is bringing a weapon you are legally allowed to carry now make you at fault? What about all the other people with guns?"

This is what I said.

If a protester shot people chasing him in self defense the same thing would've happened.

If you don't believe in open carrying and/or carrying guns to a protest that's a different issue.

But you can open carry. You just can't shoot trespassers

I’d be perfectly fine with never hearing this guys name or anything he does for the rest of my life

Yep only in America is lighting s*** on fire and vandalizing private property considered “protesting”

Right both sides made it so political that he laughin to the bank. Like let it go 😂

Anti 2nd amendment vibes itt look what cnn done did

I wanna say anyone who doesn’t just sit down and enjoy his life after walking from a situation like that scot free is destined to catch an Ultimate L but Zimmerman been round this mf doing book tours for a decade

I don’t lean towards either but is the gas s*** not a direct result of the Ukraine/Russia conflict and us getting involved? Or at least that is the “on paper” reason lol

Don't project your limitations on me farmer boy

The only reason he was legally allowed to have that weapon was because of an irrelevant Wisconsin hunting law the defense used to slip the gun charge and the judge let it go.

And let’s stop f***ing acting like he was just open carrying peacefully and not bringing a deadly weapon into a situation where he fully knew there could be a high likelihood of a violent confrontation. The kid should’ve been doing algebra homework at home not declaring himself a lawful authority and shooting protestors in a different state.

You’re making dumb excuses to defend an alt-right blood thirsty murder.

I'd like to hear whar you think happened leading up to the shootings? Do you think he just randomly shot people?

Also was everyone at the protest with a gun looking to kill people or just him? What about the person who chased him and pulled a gun out and pointed it at him?

Can't believe this has to be said lmao

This is unbelievably dark

Hey Kyle

I watched that man bleed to death. No part of me cared or even currently cares about his criminal record