people acting like dangerous criminals don't exist and they won't try to attack you if you tell them to stop stealing s***
There should be a third party audit group designed to periodically check the mental health and ethical procedures of every law enforcement agency.
if someone with responsibility wanted it to happen then it would’ve happened decades ago
Adjust the budget to allow for social workers to help in non-violent situations where someone doesn't explicitly need an officer but a peacemaker, stop giving the police old military weapons and equipment, remove the immunity that police officers have from crimes they commit (getting a pat on the back for abuse of position doesn't stop anyone), require body cameras on all police officers, make police complaint reports public (like NYC/NY (one of those)) just did, and stop allowing cops to just transfer to other departments once they do some wild f***shit and get away with it
If I was a criminal, I would just kick the social workers ass lmao what would he do? Tickle me?
This might sound absolutely braindead and if it is, fair enough:
Y'all ever played True Crime: Streets of LA? You know how you can shoot people in the arms/legs to disarm them, cops need to do that more fr
100%.
The motto should not be defund the police, it should be the opposite: invest in the police so we can replace incompetent policemen with quality law enforcement
I think defund the police stemmed from having putting more funds in them for military gear - which resulted in the deadliest years for cop killing civilians... Could be wrong though
There should be a third party audit group designed to periodically check the mental health and ethical procedures of every law enforcement agency.
Facts
1 - That already happens in the criminal justice system, it's called mediation
2 - So you need to invest more money to give policemen better equipment
3 - There's no legal or de facto immunity.
4 - I agree with this suggestion
5 - There are some crimes where there are other factors that need to be taken into account (for example: maybe the victim doesn't want to submit him or herself to the social pressure of being involved), but it's not a bad shout
6 - That is just too general of a statement
The first point is for when the police shows up to a white lady who called the police on a black men for breathing to hard or on black kids for selling lemonade
Sending a social worker or a non armed person for situations like that would have prevented - alot of blm moments imo
The police could def need that tbh
If I was a criminal, I would just kick the social workers ass lmao what would he do? Tickle me?
not everyone calls the cop on criminals
Black kids got cops called on them for selling lemonade
Do you remember what happened to 12 yo Tamir rice?
he wasn't a criminal either just so you know
The first point is for when the police shows up to a white lady who called the police on a black men for breathing to hard or on black kids for selling lemonade
Sending a social worker or a non armed person for situations like that would have prevented - alot of blm moments imo
The police could def need that tbh
you would be risking people's lives tho. If you were to do that you would need police to wait in the car or something
I think defund the police stemmed from having putting more funds in them for military gear - which resulted in the deadliest years for cop killing civilians... Could be wrong though
local government pays for most of police so I think a blanket "defund the police" is stupid
This might sound absolutely braindead and if it is, fair enough:
Y'all ever played True Crime: Streets of LA? You know how you can shoot people in the arms/legs to disarm them, cops need to do that more fr
shoot an artery in the leg and they bleed out and die...
also they dont aim for limbs because its harder to hit especially on a moving target 🤦♂️
local government pays for most of police so I think a blanket "defund the police" is stupid
Idc who pays - there's an issue of them having military gear? yes or no? If yes, fix it.
locals for each city can demand it as well
Idc who pays - there's an issue of them having military gear? yes or no? If yes, fix it.
locals for each city can demand it as well
in some places they have military equipment other places they dont.
shoot an artery in the leg and they bleed out and die...
also they dont aim for limbs because its harder to hit especially on a moving target 🤦♂️
what are the chances they hit that artery directly for them to bleed out and die?
Vs headshots or multiple shots to the chest area?
???
They are being trained to do exactly what that institution wants them to do. Shoot people.
Cops get extremely s*** training though. Put military people on the streets to patrol and they would handle these situations so much better.
Cops get extremely s*** training though. Put military people on the streets to patrol and they would handle these situations so much better.
Military in American Cities
what are the chances they hit that artery directly for them to bleed out and die?
Vs headshots or multiple shots to the chest area?
???
aiming for limbs on a moving target is very difficult which is why they dont do that...
google.com/amp/s/www.deseret.com/platform/amp/2015/1/15/20556511/why-police-don-t-aim-for-the-legs
If we reinvest in communities, Crime will go down. Of course there will still be criminals but much less so than the oppressive system we live in
Military in American Cities
european countries have military in cities. not ideal tho
Military in American Cities
aint sayin to give em military vehicles or weaponry. Just saying you put a soldier in a cops uniform, he would handle these situations way better.