Reply
  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    5 replies
    CEO

    PLEASE READ THIS BOOK AND SAVE YOUR LIFE: https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Male-Rollo-Tomassi/dp/1492777862

    Oh damn you're a redpill loser

    Yeah forget what I said earlier, you might be too far gone

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    Astronaut Dad

    sounds like u never made a girl c***in ur life n u take out ur frustration by tryna promote a mtgow lifestyle online to others, but its ok bro u can always buy a d*** sleeve or let ur girl sleep with someone who will satisfy her

    actually no, i think love is abundant.. mtgow is disgusting and you should never do that.

    i go with abundance and open relationships. you can love more than one person at a time.

    abundance mindset.

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    Litty

    Oh damn you're a redpill loser

    Yeah forget what I said earlier, you might be too far gone

    and you are a disney blue pill guy thinking you can get the perfect girl that will be with you forever? lol

  • CEO

    how can you commit to having s***with ONE PERSON for the rest of your life? looool.

    you must be a beta loser or have low s***drive to accept that

    If s***has this much power over you then you're the weakling here

  • Dec 27, 2020
    CEO

    how can you commit to having s***with ONE PERSON for the rest of your life? looool.

    you must be a beta loser or have low s***drive to accept that

    Lol, this is your argument?
    Cmon with that beta alpha bullshit, grow up

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CEO

    PLEASE READ THIS BOOK AND SAVE YOUR LIFE: https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Male-Rollo-Tomassi/dp/1492777862

    OP one of them red pill lanes huh

    Buy my course on how to be a man!!

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    im protesting

    OP one of them red pill lanes huh

    Buy my course on how to be a man!!

    im not the author lol

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    Monogamy made sense in 1950 because your access to women was local and limited to bars and other meet up places but with tinder and hinge you can now get hella girls from the comfort of your home.

    There's no reason to tie yourself down to one woman sexually anymore. Romantically? Plenty of reasons. But just sex? We should be the new hippies, free love baby!

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    SecretGarden

    Monogamy made sense in 1950 because your access to women was local and limited to bars and other meet up places but with tinder and hinge you can now get hella girls from the comfort of your home.

    There's no reason to tie yourself down to one woman sexually anymore. Romantically? Plenty of reasons. But just sex? We should be the new hippies, free love baby!

    i agree, you can be emotionally exclusive but sexually you should be abundant! right on man

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CEO

    im not the author lol

    But u subscribe to his material

    All those manosphere dudes on Twitter are frauds

  • Are you telling me a user with CEO as his username and this as his avi is an loser?! Can't be

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    im protesting

    But u subscribe to his material

    All those manosphere dudes on Twitter are frauds

    loooool

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    CEO my guy what are u doing here u have to go create VALUE

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CEO

    how can you commit to having s***with ONE PERSON for the rest of your life? looool.

    you must be a beta loser or have low s***drive to accept that

    If your main thought is s***then you're doomed to a failed marriage

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    Nine Arts Dragon

    CEO my guy what are u doing here u have to go create VALUE

    i do man, dont worry

  • Dec 27, 2020

    Some people are about it, some aren't. Generalities about human behavior are always rife with exceptions. There are plenty of people who find the benefits of stability outweigh the drawbacks and there are plenty who do not.

    The problem isn't the concept of monogamy itself but the social structures that force everyone to choose between it and sexual release.

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CEO

    i agree, you can be emotionally exclusive but sexually you should be abundant! right on man

    The f***

  • Dec 27, 2020
    Litty

    Oh damn you're a redpill loser

    Yeah forget what I said earlier, you might be too far gone

    bruh

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    HITSLIKEDIETCOKE

    The f***

    sorry you dont have the emotional intelligence to handle this kind of relationship. you probably have oneitis

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    might be true for our generation

    aint marriage at an all time low?

  • Dec 27, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    Oneitis

  • Dec 27, 2020
    Litty

    Oh damn you're a redpill loser

    Yeah forget what I said earlier, you might be too far gone

    Oh s*** yikes

  • OP
    Dec 27, 2020
    Nine Arts Dragon

    Oneitis

    hahaha

  • Dec 27, 2020
    SecretGarden

    Monogamy made sense in 1950 because your access to women was local and limited to bars and other meet up places but with tinder and hinge you can now get hella girls from the comfort of your home.

    There's no reason to tie yourself down to one woman sexually anymore. Romantically? Plenty of reasons. But just sex? We should be the new hippies, free love baby!

    They sorta have this mindset in japan. Plenty of Japanese there don't think having s***with another person while dating counts as cheating just as long as no feelings are involved. Don't think it will catch on in the West tho.

  • Oneitis