its implied that kelsey is giving answers on the stand which are different from when the prosecution deposed her.
if this is true, she's intentionally trying to ruin the prosecution's case
They asked Kelsey if she needed to refresh her memory man ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
They asked Kelsey if she needed to refresh her memory man ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
yeah prosecutor is SHOOK
?
Page 171 first post.
But basically Kelsey was offered an immunity deal before she testified.
And then she was asked if Tory ever threatened to shoot her and she said yes.
Then she was asked, why did he say that and she tried to plead the fifth.
Kelsey called Meg a liar
Immediately invoked the 5th the moment she got on stand
Said her shooting meg is "ridiculous"
Was granted immunity but still But pled the 5th on two puzzling things, despite having immunity.
https://twitter.com/JamesQueallyLAT/status/1603119300839034881Yikes. I thought she was going there in Megan's defense? This is crazy.
prosecutor can still question her on the stand about her previous deposition statements but I assume they will do that after the break. basically ask her why she's giving different answers
Yikes. I thought she was going there in Megan's defense? This is crazy.
The prosecution thought so too ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
its implied that kelsey is giving answers on the stand which are different from when the prosecution deposed her.
if this is true, she's intentionally trying to ruin the prosecution's case
or shes telling what she believes to be true and also protecting herself
she don't f*** with Meg like that. Shes don't need to go with the prosecution especially now that she has immunity.
I checked duded website and he has a typo in his description. Dont believe anything he says after that.
or shes telling what she believes to be true and also protecting herself
she don't f*** with Meg like that. Shes don't need to go with the prosecution especially now that she has immunity.
can her immunity be revoked? if not then she probably doesn't need to cooperate
can her immunity be revoked? if not then she probably doesn't need to cooperate
It cannot she's protected from anything that happened that night
It cannot she's protected from anything that happened that night
nvm I read the last part of your sentence wrong, we on the same page
It cannot she's protected from anything that happened that night
Not true see the tweets I posted above
ggs?