Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    The Public Perception has nothing to do with a criminal case. The Jury will be told to ignore any outside noise especially concerning celebrity gossip

    She was asked if they ever had relations, that’s a pretty straight forward question

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    It's wild for a woman not to tell people about who she's in a relationship with or not? Especially as a public figure?
    Everyone reserves the right to privacy and the public isn't entitled to the truth about someone's private and personal life.

    Yes it's wild in this situation, especially if it was just going to come out like the way it did.

    That's all.

    Man, woman, whoever lol.

  • Zaywop 💊
    Dec 12, 2022

    Dababy hit it the day before too!

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    2 replies
    Oblivion X

    She was asked about it, when she went on Gayle and she said nah. Feel like that kinda has importance to the case lol

    She could've meant that they wer only in a sexual relationship, not an actual relationship. Either way though, it doesn't change the circumstances if she was truly shot by Tory

  • Dec 12, 2022
    Ralo

    She could've meant that they wer only in a sexual relationship, not an actual relationship. Either way though, it doesn't change the circumstances if she was truly shot by Tory

    She denied there ever being a romantic or sexual relationship between the two.

    And yeah, the circumstances don't change really. It's still a lie however. Adds some context to that dynamic between the three.

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Oblivion X

    She was asked about it, when she went on Gayle and she said nah. Feel like that kinda has importance to the case lol

    That has almost nothing to do with the case

    Yall have no idea how court procedure works. She can say whatever to Gayle King because she isn't legally bound to the truth in a Private interview nor does it affect her credibility because her relationship matters are PRIVATE. If they wish to submit this as evidence, it will likely be denied because of how the relevance of the evidence. How does her lying to Gayle King (Apr 2022) affect the conflict which occurred July 2020?

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Ralo

    She could've meant that they wer only in a sexual relationship, not an actual relationship. Either way though, it doesn't change the circumstances if she was truly shot by Tory

    Nah she said they weren't dating or sexual relations and that they were just friends

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    No Future Awarded

    She was asked if they ever had relations, that’s a pretty straight forward question

    Okay? It's still her right to privacy and the Jury will be told to ignore the interview unless it's submitted as evidence. This has no baring on the case

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Niggamortis

    Yes it's wild in this situation, especially if it was just going to come out like the way it did.

    That's all.

    Man, woman, whoever lol.

    How is it wild? You keep saying that but not explaining how consequential this is to the actual Case? How does it affect any of the Facts?

  • Dec 12, 2022

    this Byron nigga funny as hell

  • Dec 12, 2022

    Give it a break guys the real lawyers have arrived

  • Dec 12, 2022
    Oblivion X

    Nah she said they weren't dating or sexual relations and that they were just friends

    interesting but it doesn't change the outcome if he did in fact shoot her

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    2 replies

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    How is it wild? You keep saying that but not explaining how consequential this is to the actual Case? How does it affect any of the Facts?

    It's pretty simple. She's choosing to lie about the dynamics of a friendship/relationship that is directly tied to potential reasons for a fight that then leads into a shooting.

    I'm not saying anything beyond that. It's wild to initially lie over it.

  • thekid187

    OJ moment of this generation.

    Ngl this could kick off a gender war apocalypse

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    That has almost nothing to do with the case

    Yall have no idea how court procedure works. She can say whatever to Gayle King because she isn't legally bound to the truth in a Private interview nor does it affect her credibility because her relationship matters are PRIVATE. If they wish to submit this as evidence, it will likely be denied because of how the relevance of the evidence. How does her lying to Gayle King (Apr 2022) affect the conflict which occurred July 2020?

    "How does her lying to Gayle King (Apr 2022) affect the conflict which occurred July 2020?"

    She lying bout something that happened in 2020 concerning the case tho. How does her and tory relationship have zero relevance to the case at all ? No one saying it's a huge gamechanger but it has relevancy nevertheless

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Niggamortis

    It's pretty simple. She's choosing to lie about the dynamics of a friendship/relationship that is directly tied to potential reasons for a fight that then leads into a shooting.

    I'm not saying anything beyond that. It's wild to initially lie over it.

    But How does that affect the COURT CASE? Is the Gayle King interview entered into evidence? NO.
    So this argument is meaningless as the Jury won't even consider things outside of the Court

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    But How does that affect the COURT CASE? Is the Gayle King interview entered into evidence? NO.
    So this argument is meaningless as the Jury won't even consider things outside of the Court

    What argument are you talking about.

    I'm just saying it's wild how she lied just for it to be the opposite.

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Oblivion X

    "How does her lying to Gayle King (Apr 2022) affect the conflict which occurred July 2020?"

    She lying bout something that happened in 2020 concerning the case tho. How does her and tory relationship have zero relevance to the case at all ? No one saying it's a huge gamechanger but it has relevancy nevertheless

    Because the Gayle King interview is not evidence and will not be used in trial. She is lying about her f***ing some nigga she doesnt want people to know she f***ed.
    She made this comment outside of court which is completely separate from any comments submitted to court.

  • Dec 12, 2022

    I’m a third year law student at Princeton
    Ask me anything

  • orangetcovid 👌🏿
    Dec 12, 2022
    Smacked Voodoo

    Tory's attorney has to be very sure that Meg's friend Kelsey is the one who shot her. Could've swore they already brought her in for questioning a few times this year and each time she was steady denying it. Even went on Twitter and IG a few times saying she ain't do it.

    Very bold strategy from the attorney to still go that route to say the least

    na that's what's interesting. if she's denied it all this time they had to have got to her and said if she doesn't indict Tory they'll come for her so the case already messed up from the jump

  • Dec 12, 2022

    It’s interesting that Kelsey is testifying against Tory. What happens if the bodyguard comes forward and says Kelsey fired the shot.

    • The prosecution wants Tory for it regardless of what really happened.
    • No matter the outcome we will never get the truth at this point.
    • This is going to be a case of he said Vs she said and who is the most credible.

    @davey

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    Niggamortis

    What argument are you talking about.

    I'm just saying it's wild how she lied just for it to be the opposite.

    How is it wild for a woman to lie on her p**** because she let a Nigga that she doesn't like hit?

    We all know Tory lanez was f***ing her. She is protecting her celebrity image

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    BrunsonEggNCheese

    albie from white lotus

  • Dec 12, 2022
    ·
    1 reply
    VA7a

    Because the Gayle King interview is not evidence and will not be used in trial. She is lying about her f***ing some nigga she doesnt want people to know she f***ed.
    She made this comment outside of court which is completely separate from any comments submitted to court.

    I think ur misinterpreting what people are saying lol.

    We're saying before today, we were told that there was no relationship b/n the two. Only to find out that there actually was.

    No one saying her lying bout that is gonna be used as evidence in support of tory's argument.

    We're just saying she told us misinformation bout a factor of the case that has relevancy to how we view it. That's it. Doesn't mean she lying bout the whole thing. Just means she told us something wrong

Thread was locked by
a moderator