Kelsey testimony is ADMITTED as EVIDENCE which counts just as much as her most recent testimony.
No it's not lol. Wasn't made under oath and her conflating statements essentially make her worthless as a witness.
I am not sure how Kelsey's interview is taken as truth...and her testimony on the stand isn't.
If she was compromised last week, then she could have been compromised in September, when she had 2 years+ to prepare her version of events that could have protected her.
🤷🏿♂️
No it's not lol. Wasn't made under oath and her conflating statements essentially make her worthless as a witness.
Yeah, the threat of potential perjury and being under oath has to matter, right?
You can't take the interview (without any police presence) as valid and take the testimony under oath as BS.
I mean you could and maybe the jury will! But that sounds weird
This nigga gonna find a way to mention Papi or be damned
Lmaoo nigga brought up sales in a trial thread
Wait so technically if they gave Kelsey immunity and IF it comes out that she did it nothing will happen to her she just going to go on about her life?
Can Meg sue her legal team for protecting one of her alleged attackers?
There are others calling Megan "Marcus" ITT.
@ROLF ayoooo 😭😭😭😭
Wait so technically if they gave Kelsey immunity and IF it comes out that she did it nothing will happen to her she just going to go on about her life?
Can Meg sue her legal team for protecting one of her alleged attackers?
They gave her immunity, she was under oath, and she still outright said she didn't see Tory shoot meg, said she panicked and doesn't know why she sent those text msgs, and pled the 5th in regards to her comments responding to Tory saying "I'll shoot you"
Pretty damning s*** if you ask me
But nothing will happen to Kelsey because she played the "I don't remember" card. Can't prove that she's lying, other than her literally saying that she did in that interview
They gave her immunity, she was under oath, and she still outright said she didn't see Tory shoot meg, said she panicked and doesn't know why she sent those text msgs, and pled the 5th in regards to her comments responding to Tory saying "I'll shoot you"
Pretty damning s*** if you ask me
But nothing will happen to Kelsey because she played the "I don't remember" card. Can't prove that she's lying, other than her literally saying that she did in that interview
Ik but im saying IF after all this she (Kelsey) was the shooter and the prosecution or whoever gave her immunity…does it mean nothing happens to her?
Kelsey is completely unreliable and Justin has not taken the stand / cannot be found, rolling stone article aside
Kelsey's September interview is 100% as valid as her testimony on the stand, in which she herself said she lied in the interview. She also pled the 5th to multiple questions. (But didn't plead the 5th to accusations of being paid off) Why would she do this if she had nothing to hide?
I have said gun to my head, tory probably did it but not being able to conclude his DNA being on the gun, with residue from both he and Harris and Harris admitting to lying is...reasonable doubt??? I am not a lawyer but that sounds like reasonable doubt to me.
Your first comment is personal opinion
Your second comment is valid that it calls her credibility into question however their is a reason that she would lie because she is the WIFE of 1501 Entertainment CEO who are already in a legal battle with Meg. Also Her reason for coming to the interview is because “Meg didn’t defend me in any of her statements”
3rd The Burden of Proof for Criminal Trials are beyond a reasonable doubt but there’s three people with who at one point accused Tory of shooting Meg. Tory has been accused of paying mfs off or at least attempting to. And he’s sent multiple messages to different people apologizing. Immediate texts from the situation says Tory did it. The evidence on the brink right now but its close.
I think Tory shot her but it is possible that there was a struggle for the gun with Kelsey.
Ik but im saying IF after all this she (Kelsey) was the shooter and the prosecution or whoever gave her immunity…does it mean nothing happens to her?
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure nothing would happen to her.
In court, they told her almost verbatim that she would not, under any circumstance, be prosecuted for this crime so long as she doesn't lie about the events of that night under oath
No it's not lol. Wasn't made under oath and her conflating statements essentially make her worthless as a witness.
It is though Dude. I am an actual law student. They would not play it in court if all of it wasnt admitted for Evidence
You guys know nothing about this procedure
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure nothing would happen to her.
In court, they told her almost verbatim that she would not, under any circumstance, be prosecuted for this crime so long as she doesn't lie about the events of that night under oath
Crazy
Your first comment is personal opinion
Your second comment is valid that it calls her credibility into question however their is a reason that she would lie because she is the WIFE of 1501 Entertainment CEO who are already in a legal battle with Meg. Also Her reason for coming to the interview is because “Meg didn’t defend me in any of her statements”
3rd The Burden of Proof for Criminal Trials are beyond a reasonable doubt but there’s three people with who at one point accused Tory of shooting Meg. Tory has been accused of paying mfs off or at least attempting to. And he’s sent multiple messages to different people apologizing. Immediate texts from the situation says Tory did it. The evidence on the brink right now but its close.
I think Tory shot her but it is possible that there was a struggle for the gun with Kelsey.
I believe that Tory shot her and that Kelsey severely downplayed her involvement, hence her switching up under oath. Not her being paid off, or having a grudge against Meg. She under oath, with the threat of perjury said that she didn't get paid for her testimony 🤷🏿♂️. So how then, can one say her testimony was tainted...but the September interview wasn't?
It really doesn't make sense for her to say she didn't see Tory shoot meg, when she's the only other person that could have committed the crime
The whole wife of the 1501 thing is pure internet s*** ion really give that too much credence. Like that's starting to flirt with conspiracy territory IMO
To me, the only real facts that matter is the lack of conclusive evidence with DNA, and residue being on both Tory and Kelsey. That's reasonable doubt to me, period.
How did they get that statement from a missing body guard?
He was doing security for the world cup last time I heard
Trial broke for lunch about 10 minutes early after prosecutors cruised through two witnesses in 40 minutes. Jurors already are familiar with both: The first was LAPD Officer Sandra Cabral, who was one of the officers who pulled Tory's Escalade over after the shooting.
Prosecutors recalled Officer Cabral as a witness to introduce additional body camera footage showing Kelsey after police stopped them. "She was distraught, crying" asked Meg if she was OK. In cross, Tory's lawyer asked her if she say Tory's demeanor, and how upset he was.
Cabral said in cross her job was to tend to Kelsey, while other officers were assigned to Tory and his driver and Meg. She said she can't comment on Tory's demeanor. When Tory's lawyer George Mgdesyan asked if she heard Tory ask if she was OK, Cabral said, "I did not hear that."
I believe that Tory shot her and that Kelsey severely downplayed her involvement, hence her switching up under oath. Not her being paid off, or having a grudge against Meg. She under oath, with the threat of perjury said that she didn't get paid for her testimony 🤷🏿♂️. So how then, can one say her testimony was tainted...but the September interview wasn't?
It really doesn't make sense for her to say she didn't see Tory shoot meg, when she's the only other person that could have committed the crime
The whole wife of the 1501 thing is pure internet s*** ion really give that too much credence. Like that's starting to flirt with conspiracy territory IMO
To me, the only real facts that matter is the lack of conclusive evidence with DNA, and residue being on both Tory and Kelsey. That's reasonable doubt to me, period.
The 1501 thing is very relevant considering that the CEO hung out with Tory Lanez afterwards and said # protectblackmen.
And I’ve looked it up and it seems that they are actually engaged and she was pregnant by him.
The lack of DNA just means they probably cleaned the gun afterwards.
The 1501 thing is very relevant considering that the CEO hung out with Tory Lanez afterwards and said # protectblackmen.
And I’ve looked it up and it seems that they are actually engaged and she was pregnant by him.
The lack of DNA just means they probably cleaned the gun afterwards.
It's irrelevant in that you can't actually prove that her involvement with has any barring on the outcome of the case. It's fodder, in that regard