Well, if you want to use this as your source, understand the accusations being made here.

Jackson was apparently so panicked by the public reaction to 'Living with Michael Jackson' he started molesting Gavin Arvizo after it aired.

Just wait for part 2 of this thread, that boy came from a pack of financially motivated liars and there's a reason Jay Leno and Chris Tucker were involved in the 2005 criminal trial.

Yes, they are all blatant lies.

Jordan Chandler is proven in this thread, to be an extortion attempt conceited by the scorned father with no interest in a criminal trial, ever. His own drawings of what he thinks Jackson's p**** might look like are in this thread.

Arvizo is next.

One by one they fall.

Come on.... asking a child to draw what he thinks he remembers how a mans p**** looks like and if it’s not accurate, that’s evidence he never saw it?

Like I already said.... just because some might be liars, doesn’t mean all are. And even the ones that are liars, doesn’t mean they are lying about every single thing.

And who knows if they are children who never spoke up and are still out there keeping this secret?

No no. You are not understanding. The drawing in OP is Evan Chandler, the FATHER, theorising what Jackson's p**** might look like to try and build their case. They wrongly guessed he was circumcised.

If more come forward they will be treated with respect and fresh eyes but those that have come forward all have a clear motive and inconsistent/impossible tales of abuse or flat out provable lies.

OP lays out the 1993 allegations clearly. They were a money grab. The family themselves admitted so in their own book.

didnt it turn out that dude was castrated by his dad? making the rape allegations false?

not true but the allegations are false

good post.

i remember looking into this several years back and was shocked at how much misinformation there is regarding him.

sometimes i try to tell ppl in person when the subject comes up but they rather just think he did it lol so it feels pointless

I absolutely agree there’s a lot of misinformation

But for me, there’s just too much circumstantial evidence for me to not think something happened at some point with at least one kid

i can see him being somehow emotionally abusive and weird with kids but not necessarily anything physical

Please provide this 'circumstantial evidence' you keep claiming.

You've always been real one

I think the media was photoshopping photos to make him look weird at that time. He didn't look like that on home videos and stuff

The first kid who accused him is part black and the second is mexican...

You can selectively choose bad photographs of anyone.

This is from 2007.

Yeah I'm not sure what the f*** this is, I think it's a painting.

Thread full of creepy pics.

OP snapped ong

buying rings for an 12 yr old boy..

Yeah, except for the fact Jackson bought nothing that day.

Also, if this is in reference to the infamous rings scene in Leaving Neverland, it was a pickup shot almost 15 months after the original shootings.

The whole thing was staged for 'drama'.

Facts are facts

die in a car fire

Yeah that's a rational response. Sorry that facts seem to upset you so badly, but that's a you problem sir.

I hope one day you come to terms with the fact these children are not victims and were not molested.

ur a stan stfu talking head

No, the reality is you are a weirdo who ignores factual evidence and prefers to believe, for whatever reason, children were molested.