F***ing LOL @ Mac accusing MJ

He’s in the March Esquire defending him and further discrediting Safechuck

You love to see it

Imagine having to be deeply informed on child rape law to defend ur favorite artist

and still being wrong lmaoooooooo

hee hee

There is factual evidence in OP.

Facts can not be “wrong”.

Posting videos and blogs from dedicated anti MJ websites (who conveniently just use agendas) to “prove” Jackson’s guilt doesn’t mean s*** - other than the fact you have no reading comprehension and don’t understand there are two sides to every story.

lmao shut up dude

his music is still flames but he is a f***ed up dude and you can keep do whatever mental gymnastics you need to but there is more than enough content to justify that this is fax

he has been long dead, it doesnt matter anymore

(except to the victims)

Mental gymnastics??

Extortion is pretty cut and dry.

I’ve proven in this very thread that MJ was the victim of extortion.

Learn to read. Also LOL at “victims”

im just curious op why do you care so much?

why do you give a s*** that people on this board think he was a sick, depraved man (which might I add at little fault of his own)

because this is alarming how much effort you're putting into making this argument

(also yes mental gymnastics)

The argument is not whether Michael Jackson was weird or not. It is whether he molested children. Yall niggas will spew anything except some evidence for your claims.

It’s so much easier to be told something and accept it rather than checking to see if it’s true for yourself.

This dude had books of naked kids, and shared beds with kids? And there's no potential for correlation there?

Latoya already said that her Husband at the time was abusing her and threatened her to accuse Michael. She feared her safety so she did.

This is like the most explainable "proof" you can find lol

Prince would never

Just let the man Rest In Peace.

he already resting bro he dead

Niggas are too lazy to do some f***ing research itt. I have seen people who was totally against MJ switched up their opinion, because they took the time. On surface level, it looks like he's guilty, but with actual time and research, you can find he's innocent.

There is absolutely a potential correlation. The correlation is strikingly alarming. Does not confirm or prove a single thing though.

why does it take that much time

give them the irrefutable evidence

its that easy

You’ve ignored OP so clearly it’s not that easy.

Why does it take that much time?!?!

Bro, don't you see we living in a society now that the media would push this thing of "guilty until proven innocent".

Look at the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard situation, it took 3-4 years to prove that Johnny was innocent all along, and what does the media do?

IGNORES IT