I won't comment on other accusations until I know the full ins and outs of them. It would be unfair to do so.
It is also why I can so confidently say after the years of research I've done that Michael Jackson did not commit the crimes he was accused of.
OP really gave his life to this honorable cause.
The Arvizo allegations are the easiest to debunk and that really says something.
damn man you got me. looks like micheal jackson is innocent you managed to outwit odeon the ktt poster even tho he wasn't even saying anything nor does he care how do you do that
OP really gave his life to this honorable cause.
It's a fascinating topic. I learnt an awful lot about law through it.
damn man you got me. looks like micheal jackson is innocent you managed to outwit odeon the ktt poster even tho he wasn't even saying anything nor does he care how do you do that
Lol what? If you didn't care you wouldn't have gone looking for the Arvizo GIF as if it was some sort of proof.
If you believe Michael Jackson molested James Safechuck, the boy in the picture, you believe he was a time traveller.
His claims are insanely ridiculous and easily debunked.
It's funny how I said in OP:
'If a picture of Michael with Emmanuel Lewis or art from Neverland is all you've got as proof that, as Wade Robson and James Safechuck (I'll get to them) say, Michael Jackson was the biggest paedophilic ring master of all time, who scoured the world for children to abuse, it speaks volumes.'
for the record i dont care if he did it or not.
He's still the GOAT
Long live the king
It's funny how I said in OP:
'If a picture of Michael with Emmanuel Lewis or art from Neverland is all you've got as proof that, as Wade Robson and James Safechuck (I'll get to them) say, Michael Jackson was the biggest paedophilic ring master of all time, who scoured the world for children to abuse, it speaks volumes.'
for the record i dont care if he did it or not.
He's still the GOAT
Long live the king
If that was the case you wouldn't have scoured the internet suggesting those images were some sort of proof.
Unless you've bookmarked them then..
If that was the case you wouldn't have scoured the internet suggesting those images were some sort of proof.
Unless you've bookmarked them then..
why would he have this painting in his house?
why would he have this painting in his house?
Plenty of times, Michael asked people like David Nordahl to insert himself into famous paintings.
michaeljacksonnotes.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/superman.jpg
michaeljacksonnotes.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/mj_superman.jpg
So if that proves he was a pedophile, does the above link also prove he was Superman?