Apr 16, 2020·2 repliesSinewaveHe hasn’t been able to respond to a single thread of evidence itt
Just keeps saying s*** he has zero proof of
Apr 16, 2020·1 replydiscmanthe phone calls are in the leaving neverland doc by hbo
So his is detailed description of abuse in a building that didn’t exist which completely derails his entire abuse timeline but ok sir
- Apr 16, 2020·1 replyKingOfPop
So his is detailed description of abuse in a building that didn’t exist which completely derails his entire abuse timeline but ok sir
u know mj had a lot of hidden rooms. a lot.
bedrooms everywhere for "playtime" with his boy friends - Apr 16, 2020·1 replydiscman
https://www.reddit.com/r/LeavingNeverlandHBO/comments/g0f7ox/former_deputy_district_attorney_lauren_weis/
check that out
OP has been over this several times
- Apr 16, 2020Sinewave
OP has been over this several times
one of the victims, then?
Apr 16, 2020·2 repliesthose notes in op where they’re trying to speculate what his p**** looks like are hilarious idc
- Apr 16, 2020discman
https://www.reddit.com/r/LeavingNeverlandHBO/comments/g0f7ox/former_deputy_district_attorney_lauren_weis/
check that out
OP:
Lie #2: MJs p**** was accurately described by Jordan Chandler in 1993
Truth: In 1994, the prosecution seeked to gain MJs medical records and asked Katherine Jackson, his mother, if Jackson had 'altered' his p****. He also would've been arrested on the spot during the December 1993 strip search. The p**** described was circumcised, MJ was not. The only 'close' description was that MJ had vitiligo. But anyone with a brain knew that anyway.
Here is Evan Chandler's drawing, published in their own book, which shows them brainstorming what it might look like - see the 'My theory' notes in the right: themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/drawing-vg-book.jpg?w=640
Here is pro-prosecution site proudly stating the description matched and Jackson was in fact circumcised to put pressure on Jackson in 2005 during his trial: web.archive.org/web/20090630025648/http://www.thesmokinggun.com/michaeljackson/010605jacksonsplotch.htm
More sources: articles.latimes.com/1994-03-16/local/me-34715_1_grand-jury
autopsyfiles.org/reports/Celebs/jackson,%20michael_report.pdf - Apr 16, 2020·1 replyfrank 2022
those notes in op where they’re trying to speculate what his p**** looks like are hilarious idc
op would be useful if he obsessed over something or someone who was not the biggest pedo in american history
- Apr 16, 2020discman
u know mj had a lot of hidden rooms. a lot.
bedrooms everywhere for "playtime" with his boy friendsThe rooms so hidden Jackson did several photoshoots in them? Oh yes, sure.
Apr 16, 2020·1 replyMake a docu-series instead of a thread and I’ll consider your side
- Apr 16, 2020discman
op would be useful if he obsessed over something or someone who was not the biggest pedo in american history
what?
- Apr 16, 2020·1 replydiscman
i was intellectually developed enough to know that wade and jimmy weren't lying.
i wasn't emotionally developed enough to understand why stans would go out of their way to stan for a hyper-cunning sociopath.
i've finally resigned myself to understanding that if a pedophile can capture all of your hopes and dreams in a sonic file, you're emotionally invested in believing that THAT pedophile is different and special and didn't do what he executed with the precision of a secret agent. michael jackson raped little boys in psychologically torturous romantic relationships that jackson dissolved when a new bright boy entered his world. he bullied and threatened his victims into silenced corners.
and despite all this, good triumphed over evil. gavin is happily married. jimmy, wade. they're all happily married in heterosexual relationships. fate is not decided in an instant, but can be nurtured and built, and these abused men have triumphed over evil and left a greater mark on mankind than the best selling record of all-time ever could.
You American?
- Apr 16, 2020·2 replies
has never answered or will never answer
why pedo jackson
was in a ring store
with an 11 year old boy.
cctv doesn't lie
- Apr 16, 2020·1 replyfrank 2022
those notes in op where they’re trying to speculate what his p**** looks like are hilarious idc
This is what Tom Sneddon, the chief prosecutor in 2005 wanted to include in the 'Prior Bad Acts' motion. The drawing.
The reason they wanted no further evidence is because Jordan stated Jackson was circumcised (provable false in OP) and that Jackson had a splotch on the complete wrong side.
- Apr 16, 2020·1 replysosAMG
You American?
yes
- Apr 16, 2020discman
@KingOfPop
has never answered or will never answer
why pedo jackson
was in a ring store
with an 11 year old boy.
cctv doesn't lie
You're right it doesn't and neither do receipts that prove Jackson bought nothing that day in way of 'wedding rings'.
Now answer my questions.
- Apr 16, 2020·1 replyGladimir
Make a docu-series instead of a thread and I’ll consider your side
Here
- Apr 16, 2020·1 reply
U had me until u went into detail about what the man’s Johnson looks like
- Apr 16, 2020discman
@KingOfPop
has never answered or will never answer
why pedo jackson
was in a ring store
with an 11 year old boy.
cctv doesn't lie
Sounds like you’re just jealous you can’t afford to get iced out the way those kids Mike generously provided for could
- Apr 16, 2020Resurrected Ducks
U had me until u went into detail about what the man’s Johnson looks like
I know I know - it's part of the accusation and a huge piece of proof Jackson was innocent.
- Apr 16, 2020·1 replyKingOfPop
This is what Tom Sneddon, the chief prosecutor in 2005 wanted to include in the 'Prior Bad Acts' motion. The drawing.
The reason they wanted no further evidence is because Jordan stated Jackson was circumcised (provable false in OP) and that Jackson had a splotch on the complete wrong side.
I hope people argue about my p**** when I’m gone
- Apr 16, 2020frank 2022
I hope people argue about my p**** when I’m gone
How powerful must you be for that to happen
- Apr 16, 2020
under different circumstances tho yikes didn’t think that statement through
Apr 16, 2020
- Apr 16, 2020·2 repliesdiscman
yes
Just couldnt imagine anyone who knows body language/American nuances to see that documentary and think “yeah these guys seem truthful”
