The people who disagree weren't around that time imho
I mean, even then the media representation of what happened in the court room in 2005 was completely different to what actually went on.
They were being laughed at while Arvizo was on the stand, yet Fox News etc was laughing at Jackson.
"I will eat crow if Jackson walks'' was the sort of thing being said.
not criminally guilty but objectively a creepy weirdo for sleeping in the same bed with children
ill still listen to him though, others have done provable worse criminal things. like rick james. i feel really sorry for MJ too because of all the things he had to face in his life
Is that a crime?
Idk man I can tell you I wouldn't let my kids anywhere near that s***
All I got from this thread is that one of the greatest artists of all time was uncut
Hold this L if you a V neck
Shut up you turtle neck wearer
not criminally guilty but objectively a creepy weirdo for sleeping in the same bed with children
ill still listen to him though, others have done provable worse criminal things. like rick james. i feel really sorry for MJ too because of all the things he had to face in his life
David Bowie had s***with underage women and is praised where Jackson should be “cancelled” for a crime he didn’t commit.
'I did finally meet Bubbles in a sanctuary' - her quote not mine
Sounds to me like she was upset Michael didn't give her any money from Heal the World (because that's all MJ was for most people, a money ticket and she directly said so) and is re-iterating claims made by Jack Gordon of all people lmao
I mean it’s all opinion.
I believe Jane, she has no reason to lie. She knew bubbles for like 2 decades. Whatever happened there was bad. Bottom line I think mj was wrong keeping bubbles at all. He was wrong to have kids in his bed. He was wrong holding blanket out the window Doesn’t stop me bumping rock my world, rn.
that Leaving Neverland s*** and how everyone was believing it had me so f***ing pissed off. like how did they get away with that AND had people believing it?
because that oprah stamp of approval immediately blinds people, because they think she is a respectable person (lolol)
I mean it’s all opinion.
I believe Jane, she has no reason to lie. She knew bubbles for like 2 decades. Whatever happened there was bad. Bottom line I think mj was wrong keeping bubbles at all. He was wrong to have kids in his bed. He was wrong holding blanket out the window Doesn’t stop me bumping rock my world, rn.
She wanted money for Heal the World and didn't get it.
She would not be the first to 'turn' on Jackson because she didn't get what she wanted from him. This thread is proof of that.
Alright OP. Who exactly benefits from tarnishing an icons legacy who even in death continues to make a lot of money for a lot of people? It’s not like he was some saintly advocate for radical change in the world and needed to be silenced.
He was a great artist but super f***ed up in the head and he’s definitely guilty of being an insane creep and having young boys sleep over in his bed for months at a time at the very least. Just get over it.
David Bowie had s***with underage women and is praised where Jackson should be “cancelled” for a crime he didn’t commit.
OP acts like he was in the bedroom
Even if an actual rape didn’t occur, doesn’t mean sexual assault didn’t happen
Obviously this is gross s*** to talk and think about but since we are here in this thread.....
Michael could’ve placed his hand on a kids genitals while they were sleeping or placed their hand on his
That would be impossible to prove without literally walking in on it or video proof
And yeah that’s not raping a child, but it’s just as disgusting and disturbing
I can’t sit here and say those things definitely happened, but you can’t sit here and say they definitely didn’t happen, because you weren’t there.
If this was just a one time thing that came up, maybe you would have a point. But this was a multi-year, huge investigation with sooooooo many different rumors and circumstantial evidence and different children involved.... where there is smoke there is fire.
David Bowie had s***with underage women and is praised where Jackson should be “cancelled” for a crime he didn’t commit.
people also have tried to "cancel" bowie you have just chosen to ignore it lol
All I got from this thread is that one of the greatest artists of all time was uncut
Hold this L if you a V neck
wish i had my foreskin
people also have tried to "cancel" bowie you have just chosen to ignore it lol
Show me the 4 hour David Bowie documentary.
Show me the endless media articles.
Show me the products with Bowie's image being pulled.
Show me.
Alright OP. Who exactly benefits from tarnishing an icons legacy who even in death continues to make a lot of money for a lot of people? It’s not like he was some saintly advocate for radical change in the world and needed to be silenced.
He was a great artist but super f***ed up in the head and he’s definitely guilty of being an insane creep and having young boys sleep over in his bed for months at a time at the very least. Just get over it.
Oh boy. The delusion.
Jackson was the most powerful black man on the planet in the entertainment industry. Black. Jackson owned the most lucrative publishing catalogue in the entire industry and bought it for DIRT cheap.
Who benefits from this public lynching? Ask Oprah, David Geffen and everyone else involved in 'Leaving Neverland'. Maybe the multi-million dollar lawsuits (conveniently left out of the mockumentary)?! There is much benefit in disgracing a dead man, especially financial gain.
He was the victim of the biggest witch hunt in modern media history. He had his wrongs but he was NOT a pedophile.