So, as you guys know I made my series of threads on how Michael Jackson was not only innocent, but the victim of extortion. Filled with court documents and other evidence I tried to inform on what the mainstream media refuse to report.
Here we are again, as the Michael Jackson Estate had a huge day in court yesterday as one half of the accusers in the mockumentary Leaving Neverland, James Safechuck, has had their case dismissed.
James Safechuck gained notoriety after accusing Michael Jackson of molesting him in a building that didn’t exist. This is the credibility you are dealing with here.
I highly doubt you will see this plastered all over the media the same way Leaving Neverland was, but for those interested in the accusations - Michael Jackson, and the truth, prevail yet again.
“Lies run sprints, but the truth runs marathons”. - Michael Jackson
TL:DR - James Safechuck, one of the Leaving Neverland accusers has been thrown out of court. Only Wade Robson is left and that is also a ticking time bomb.
i need a b**** that ride for me the way KingOfPop rides for MJ
You deserve it king 👑
Weirdos who think they learn everything by watching documentaries wont care about this one.
Anyone who thinks he's guilty hasn't been paying attention long enough or is just wilfully ignoring the mountain of evidence siding with MJ over some bad feelings and misunderstandings.
Mfers blindly believe s*** cause it was in a documentary while the man cant even defend himself
Anyone pretending they know he’s 100% innocent or 100% guilty are douche bags
Anyone pretending they know he’s 100% innocent or 100% guilty are douche bags
look, we will never know if he was 100% innocent but id say that at this point i think its ok to assume it's abt like 96% confirmed the man didn't do that s***
10000% innocent by default!
This s*** should never come up to the news.
Take it to court underground(no tmz you b****) and fight your case, if you then win then you can say what you want. Still you a b**** for trying to smear his legacy.
MJ is always gonna be the king regardless.
look, we will never know if he was 100% innocent but id say that at this point i think its ok to assume it's abt like 96% confirmed the man didn't do that s***
Idk man there’s just so much sus s*** that is true. I’m not someone who says he did s***, but I won’t say he didn’t either.
And it’s not like there’s any actual evidence that could ever come out at this point unless there’s literal photos/videos. It would just be hearsay.
Even back then, it’s incredibly hard to prove stuff like that.... not to go into detail but.... say he just laid in beds with the boys and they laid naked and had placed his hand on their privates or had them place their hands on his while they slept.
That’s still child molestation/pedophile s*** and that would be literally impossible to prove, even at the time. It would just be their word against his.
Idk man there’s just so much sus s*** that is true. I’m not someone who says he did s***, but I won’t say he didn’t either.
And it’s not like there’s any actual evidence that could ever come out at this point unless there’s literal photos/videos. It would just be hearsay.
Even back then, it’s incredibly hard to prove stuff like that.... not to go into detail but.... say he just laid in beds with the boys and they laid naked and had placed his hand on their privates or had them place their hands on his while they slept.
That’s still child molestation/pedophile s*** and that would be literally impossible to prove, even at the time. It would just be their word against his.
The burden of proof is with the accuser. I’m sorry but so many inconsistencies only prove one thing to me.