Silver you were doing so well
Everything going smoothly, almost zero hiccups
Might as well throw in a new wrinkle or two with playoffs beginning in a week
They’re literally going to ruin the bubble for this s***...
4 guests per person
its done
Silver you were doing so well
mfs about to start bringing stallions in there talking bout that’s my auntie
@MetaphoricalOne now we can do a deep synergy breakdown. im going to include as many relevant numbers as possible.
Transition:
Tatum - 14% freq (from here on all % equals frequency), 1.23 PPP, 73rd percentile
Booker - 19%, 1.19, 67th percentile
Overall half court:
Tatum - 86%, .968 ppp, 58th percentile
Booker - 81%, .998, 69th percentile.
Also, this may not be as relevant in the big picture, but looking at overall short shot clock situations (clock at less than 4 seconds) Tatum ranks in the 76th percentile on higher volume, while Booker is down in the 29th percentile.
Pick and roll offense
Tatum - 527 possessions, 1.04 ppp, 82nd percentile
Booker - 966 possessions, 1.01 ppp, 73rd percentile
Pick and roll offense, shots only
Tatum - 388 possessions, 1.021, 89th percentile
Booker - 475 possessions, .926, 70th percentile,
Pick and roll, passes
Tatum - 139 possessions, 1.101, 59th percentile
Booker - 491 possessions, 1.092, 56th percentile (this is why I say tatum has playmaker potential, he just needs more volume)
Isolation offense
Tatum - 273 possessions (has a higher frequency for this play type than booker, should be noted), 1.018 PPP, 76th percentile
Booker - 286 possessions, 1.017 ppp, 75th percentile
Isolation, shots only
Tatum - 240 possessions, .996 ppp, 75th percentile
Booker - 197 possessions, .954 ppp, 69th percentile
Isolation, passes
Tatum - 33, 1.182 ppp, 72nd percentile (again, he's capable)
Booker - 89, 1.157, 67th percentile
Catch and shoot, in the half court
Tatum - 134 possessions, 1.142 ppp, 67th percentile
Booker - 205 possessions, 1.19 ppp, 29th percentile
Guarded catch and shoot shots
Tatum - 51 possessions, 1.275 ppp, 95th percentile
Booker - .772, 79th percentile.
take from these numbers what you will, but i think it paints a much clearer picture on their offensive abilities. to be continued, again.
@MetaphoricalOne now we can do a deep synergy breakdown. im going to include as many relevant numbers as possible.
Transition:
Tatum - 14% freq (from here on all % equals frequency), 1.23 PPP, 73rd percentile
Booker - 19%, 1.19, 67th percentile
Overall half court:
Tatum - 86%, .968 ppp, 58th percentile
Booker - 81%, .998, 69th percentile.
Also, this may not be as relevant in the big picture, but looking at overall short shot clock situations (clock at less than 4 seconds) Tatum ranks in the 76th percentile on higher volume, while Booker is down in the 29th percentile.
Pick and roll offense
Tatum - 527 possessions, 1.04 ppp, 82nd percentile
Booker - 966 possessions, 1.01 ppp, 73rd percentile
Pick and roll offense, shots only
Tatum - 388 possessions, 1.021, 89th percentile
Booker - 475 possessions, .926, 70th percentile,
Pick and roll, passes
Tatum - 139 possessions, 1.101, 59th percentile
Booker - 491 possessions, 1.092, 56th percentile (this is why I say tatum has playmaker potential, he just needs more volume)
Isolation offense
Tatum - 273 possessions (has a higher frequency for this play type than booker, should be noted), 1.018 PPP, 76th percentile
Booker - 286 possessions, 1.017 ppp, 75th percentile
Isolation, shots only
Tatum - 240 possessions, .996 ppp, 75th percentile
Booker - 197 possessions, .954 ppp, 69th percentile
Isolation, passes
Tatum - 33, 1.182 ppp, 72nd percentile (again, he's capable)
Booker - 89, 1.157, 67th percentile
Catch and shoot, in the half court
Tatum - 134 possessions, 1.142 ppp, 67th percentile
Booker - 205 possessions, 1.19 ppp, 29th percentile
Guarded catch and shoot shots
Tatum - 51 possessions, 1.275 ppp, 95th percentile
Booker - .772, 79th percentile.
take from these numbers what you will, but i think it paints a much clearer picture on their offensive abilities. to be continued, again.
mfs think taytum not better than booker?
booker done peaked already
Everything going smoothly, almost zero hiccups
Might as well throw in a new wrinkle or two with playoffs beginning in a week
Silver shooting his shot in front of Jesus
Damnit Tito did u really have to post this seconds before my joke?
@MetaphoricalOne We also have to gauge pure player impact. So we all know top to bottom the celtics are a much superior team to phoenix. But even on a team in top 5 in offensive and defensive efficiency, tatum sticks out. Of all our players who play major, regular minutes, he has the second highest offensive rating, highest defensive rating, and the highest overall net rating. The biggest indicator of his impact tho is the fact that when you look at on/off data, he is the only player where we go negative when he sits.
For example, when Kemba is playing, we have a +7.1 net rating, so we outscore opponents by 7.1 points per 100 when he's on the court. when Kemba isn't playing, our net rating is +7.1. So overall we are performing the exact same way whether or not kemba plays. However, when tatum is playing, our net rating is a +10.6, and when he's on the bench, that drops all the way to a -0.6. He's the only player on the team where we crater when he sits. Even though the sample size isn't super large, he's the only starter we have who regularly plays with 4 bench guys around him. the most used tatum + bench lineup has a +18.8 net rating. So there is some proof he can lead those units as well, not just benefit from playing with starters.
for some more context on the net rating stuff, thats better numbers than the mavs have with our without doncic (they stay positive when he sits) we are worse without tatum than the bucks are without giannis, and we have a higher net rating with tatum on the court than the rockets do with harden on the court.
tatum is 6th in the league, among guys playing at least 25 minutes per game in overall net rating. 1-4 are all members of the bucks starting lineup, and id say those numbers are obvs inflated by giannis. outside of milwaukee players, only kawhi is in front of him.
He still going on about this s***?
aint you steal hundreds of thousands of people dollars in that pyramid scheme
i was threatened and doxed by hacker crime people most likely associated with another project and forced to cease activity or face consequences. this s*** freaked me out so i decided to freeze everything and log off for an extended period including here. never did i sell or steal people's money there's still like 40k in ethereum just sitting around i never touched and plan on using for the good of the project. h3x isn't dead people are just f***ing stupid and misinformed as f***.
obv i hold a decent amount of responsibility on dispersing like a b**** and i accept that but people who actually tried and successfully ruined the project are just as guilty
@MetaphoricalOne We also have to gauge pure player impact. So we all know top to bottom the celtics are a much superior team to phoenix. But even on a team in top 5 in offensive and defensive efficiency, tatum sticks out. Of all our players who play major, regular minutes, he has the second highest offensive rating, highest defensive rating, and the highest overall net rating. The biggest indicator of his impact tho is the fact that when you look at on/off data, he is the only player where we go negative when he sits.
For example, when Kemba is playing, we have a +7.1 net rating, so we outscore opponents by 7.1 points per 100 when he's on the court. when Kemba isn't playing, our net rating is +7.1. So overall we are performing the exact same way whether or not kemba plays. However, when tatum is playing, our net rating is a +10.6, and when he's on the bench, that drops all the way to a -0.6. He's the only player on the team where we crater when he sits. Even though the sample size isn't super large, he's the only starter we have who regularly plays with 4 bench guys around him. the most used tatum + bench lineup has a +18.8 net rating. So there is some proof he can lead those units as well, not just benefit from playing with starters.
for some more context on the net rating stuff, thats better numbers than the mavs have with our without doncic (they stay positive when he sits) we are worse without tatum than the bucks are without giannis, and we have a higher net rating with tatum on the court than the rockets do with harden on the court.
tatum is 6th in the league, among guys playing at least 25 minutes per game in overall net rating. 1-4 are all members of the bucks starting lineup, and id say those numbers are obvs inflated by giannis. outside of milwaukee players, only kawhi is in front of him.
are you excited that the celtics are the best team in the league?
i was threatened and doxed by hacker crime people most likely associated with another project and forced to cease activity or face consequences. this s*** freaked me out so i decided to freeze everything and log off for an extended period including here. never did i sell or steal people's money there's still like 40k in ethereum just sitting around i never touched and plan on using for the good of the project. h3x isn't dead people are just f***ing stupid and misinformed as f***.
obv i hold a decent amount of responsibility on dispersing like a b**** and i accept that but people who actually tried and successfully ruined the project are just as guilty
damn wtf I miss lmao
damn wtf I miss lmao
from what i gathered, he scammed some ppl, left the internet, but couldnt beat his ktt addiction so now hes back and had to make something up
from what i gathered, he scammed some ppl, left the internet, but couldnt beat his ktt addiction so now hes back and had to make something up