krishna bound

5y

all im saying is that twitter has shown they have the ability to restrict certain content algorithmically. people who misgender people are almost immediately banned for example, or who use certain # trends identified as dangerous or trolls. if they can use technology to remove that content instantly there is literally no f***ing excuse they cannot remove the small communities of pedophiles on their website or literal f***ing child p***. its insane this is still an issue. stuff like PhotoDNA exists. it is ridiculous and the fact they push it as far as they can by explicitly saying they allow discussion of sexualization of children really shows where their priorities are.

krishna bound

5y

for people who say "no companies are defending pedophilia its just myth" the twitter terms of service directly say pedophilia is okay, their ToS explicitly says it permits "discussion of attraction towards minors" which is literally pushing the boundary to the very edge of the legality of such. literal administrators on discord - a site which has a massive grooming problem to the extent to FBI has been involved multiple times - were found to participating in barely legal furry child p*** rings (only legal because it was "drawn"). netflix is putting out s*** like big mouth and this. there is a documentary about a 11 year old drag queen stripping for older men in a club and he had his face in times square. drag is thing, okay. stripping though? come on. this isnt even getting into the rise of terminology like MAP and how this is actively been facilitated through media. do you think films or documentaries about pedophilies are just random people? that s*** has investors in it too. this is a continually massive problem. and before anyone says anything, yeah, there were pedo issues in the 90s and early 00s too. like yeah there were issues with 15-16 pop singers being sexualized and adult women kissing little boys in movies. but this s*** is on a whole different level its not just suggestive sexualization its like straight up applying adult hypersexuality onto children

weneedabigman

5y

If your satire essentially just becomes what you’re attempting to satirize for those same people to gawk at, then it’s s*** satire

Ooo

5y

He said it’s about the hypersexualization of little girls does not mean he wants to sexual ize them. It’s what society (specifically the west) does

CactusJackSentYa

5y

Had to fact check this (because you basically responding to my post) , and you're already lying in your very first point.

You cut out part of Twitters policy to make it look like they were saying something they weren't when they SPECIFICALLY say, the actual phenomenon/condition of pedophilia itself is allowed to be discussed. You can't just log on and talk about how you think some kid is so sexy,.

What is not a violation of this policy?

"Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way. Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors. "

What is in violation of this policy?

"Any content that depicts or promotes child sexual exploitation including, but not limited to:

visual depictions of a child engaging in sexually explicit or sexually suggestive acts;
illustrated, computer-generated or other forms of realistic depictions of a human child in a sexually explicit context, or engaging in sexually explicit acts;
sexualized commentaries about or directed at a known or unknown minor; and
links to third-party sites that host child sexual exploitation material.
The following behaviors are also not permitted:
sharing fantasies about or promoting engagement in child sexual exploitation;
expressing a desire to obtain materials that feature child sexual exploitation;
recruiting, advertising or expressing an interest in a commercial s***act involving a child, or in harboring and/or transporting a child for sexual purposes;
sending sexually explicit media to a child;
engaging or trying to engage a child in a sexually explicit conversation;
trying to obtain sexually explicit media from a child or trying to engage a child in sexual activity through blackmail or other incentives; and
identifying alleged victims of childhood sexual exploitation by name or image."

krishna bound

5y

"yeah i want to make a social message about sexualization so in order to do so im gonna hire little girls, make them wear skimpy outfits, and twerk for me on camera"

lolita was literally a transgressive film about pedophilic manipulation and it actively avoided the sexualization of the actor

krishna bound

5y

"yeah i want to make a social message about sexualization so in order to do so im gonna hire little girls, make them wear skimpy outfits, and twerk for me on camera"

lolita was literally a transgressive film about pedophilic manipulation and it actively avoided the sexualization of the actor

Ooo

5y

That’s subjective. Many can say the actor was sexualized

krishna bound

5y

everything is subjective and given the outrage about this on the level of people actively recognizing it as sexualization rather than art theres something to be said about it being in the wrong

krishna bound

5y

"you're lying"

also posts a quote which literally says: "Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted"

f*** outta here with this bullshit. go on twitter and see the open f***ing pedophilia there with #MAP bullshit and tell me they're doing anything about it

Ooo

5y

How many of them have actually seen it? They were stupid to put the word “twerk” in it but I haven’t seen it so I can’t say how far it’s going. There’s alone of course but I’d have to see to know though I have no interest in this at all

CactusJackSentYa

5y

What twitter said verbatim: Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way. Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors.

What you quoted: discussion of attraction towards minors

Dawg, you really finna sit her and act like you didn't clip 90% of their statement. Where they clearly define what is and in't OK.

Ya'll niggas are on some other s***

CactusJackSentYa

5y

What twitter said verbatim: Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way. Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors.

What you quoted: discussion of attraction towards minors

Dawg, you really finna sit her and act like you didn't clip 90% of their statement. Where they clearly define what is and in't OK.

Ya'll niggas are on some other s***

krishna bound

5y

im not watching it to see if its "art" or child-sexualization shlock. the description and picture of it alone are honestly sickening to me and if i cant get past the promotion theyve already failed at presenting their message in a moderated form

krishna bound

5y

there are literally massive communities of open pedophiles on twitter which are not banned or moderated in any way, i am not linking that s*** because it is f***ing sick but it is a genuine problem. why do you get off capping for massive corporations

CactusJackSentYa

5y

I think it's sick too
And they violating twitter ToS so they should be banned for it. Twitter has banned countless pedophiles, racists, etc but obviously some slip through the cracks, but you can say that about EVERY site. Even KTT has pedophiles who are still actively posting

Ain't nobody caping for corporations. Ya'll just out here running with baseless claims that corporations are normalizing pedophilia when they not.

SUPER RED

5y

Even the film producer openly says its to hyper sexualize kids

Ooo

5y

Social commentary exists

CactusJackSentYa

5y

I think it's sick too
And they violating twitter ToS so they should be banned for it. Twitter has banned countless pedophiles, racists, etc but obviously some slip through the cracks, but you can say that about EVERY site. Even KTT has pedophiles who are still actively posting

Ain't nobody caping for corporations. Ya'll just out here running with baseless claims that corporations are normalizing pedophilia when they not.