so anyway private property is violence
Allow squatters in your home snowboy
Allow squatters in your home snowboy
ive been letting people sublet in my place for like 10 years lol
sleep on a park bench for a week and get back to me
Some of us grind to have what we have
Some of us grind to have what we have
"some of us grind to have what we have"
"some of us grind to have what we have"
You’re the one commie posting lmao
You’re the one commie posting lmao
are you actually a slumlord or is this just posturing
homeless people aren't coming to take your parents basement, I promise
are you actually a slumlord or is this just posturing
homeless people aren't coming to take your parents basement, I promise
Neither dumb ass
Just saying, the s*** you’re saying in here is mad out of touch and stupid
Neither dumb ass
Just saying, the s*** you’re saying in here is mad out of touch and stupid
whatever you say nerd
sleep on a park bench for a week and get back to me
Youre very judgmental. How do you know he hasn’t? You don’t know his story.
Synop somewhere smiling
so anyway private property is violence
you know personal dwellings are not what marx and engels refer to when they discuss private property right?
that being said i find it hard to believe this was her actual "family home" if she be gone for 30+ days so yeah prolly a slumlord
Neither dumb ass
Just saying, the s*** you’re saying in here is mad out of touch and stupid
impressively bad member since 2024 tbh
you know personal dwellings are not what marx and engels refer to when they discuss private property right?
that being said i find it hard to believe this was her actual "family home" if she be gone for 30+ days so yeah prolly a slumlord
We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.
Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.
Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?
But does wage-labour create any property for the labourer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labour, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labour for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour. Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.
To be a capitalist, is to have not only a purely personal, but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion.
Capital is therefore not a personal; it is a social power.
you know personal dwellings are not what marx and engels refer to when they discuss private property right?
that being said i find it hard to believe this was her actual "family home" if she be gone for 30+ days so yeah prolly a slumlord
by family home i mean the home she was raised in, the home her parents lived in, and she inherited after they died.
clearly it isn't her primary residence, but idk what better word to use other than "family home" to describe it.
impressively bad member since 2024 tbh
He just graduated college I assume
impressively bad member since 2024 tbh
you made a bait thread out of a tweet from some maga fascist
you made a bait thread out of a tweet from some maga fascist
and somehow im still not as annoying as you
See now I understand squatters doing this with abandoned houses or apartments, but this is a whole family home...how do they just stay there for 30+ days without the owner kicking them out before then? S***, how exactly does squatters rights even apply for a whole ass family's home
We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.
Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.
Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?
But does wage-labour create any property for the labourer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labour, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labour for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour. Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.
To be a capitalist, is to have not only a purely personal, but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion.
Capital is therefore not a personal; it is a social power.
exactly the passage i was thinking of, yes. and from the further reading i did this property was actually unoccupied, so it's all good, this is all 100% bait. perfect opportunity to redpill some niggas though