nvm

probably for the better though, don’t you dare offer more than 50m, even that is a borderline stretch…. rather have minteh for 70 i guess

chelsea finally addressing it but idk if that’s the right guy lol

brentford slapping teams left & right these days

Lyon

We put them baguette eaters to sleep

Last 15 mins almost gave me a heart attack lol

Konate

lmfao

Mbappé not playing this season

@humey u fancy him don’t you? or that was someone else who likes him

idk why i thought he already left for saudis this transfer window

Liverpool ruined the market last year, that's why we're seeing this madness now

i do honestly, 80 mil though, nah lol

Madrid paid 140 mil for a winger with one good full season

Liverpool started that nonsense with Wirtz last year so…

I’m not disagreeing whole thing feels like a snowball effect, Isak was more egregious I’d say

bruh you’re acting as if y’all didn’t spend 100m on goddamn Antony..

Isak was OD I will say that

Yeah Isak was bad as well, but at least he proved himself to be able to get 20+ prem goals. Wirtz had one good season in a farmers league.

but talking about some “ruined the market” s*** as if both Manchester clubs didn’t spearhead it way before that cmon

£330 mil in player sales

1. United only paid 80 mil for Antony, that 100 mil story only got invented because he signed for United. Add-ons were never paid.

2. United got made fun of for 2 whole years, every opportunity an a***yst had (especially United ex players) they mentioned this fake transfer fee and how s*** Antony was. On the other hand it’s been close to crickets on Wirtz and Isak (who both cost considerably more), every now and then we got someone saying ‘there is a talented player in there, but he hasn’t shown it so far’. That’s it.

This whole sales/net spend argument falls completely flat in the market inflation debate. If you sell 8 players for 300 mil, but just bought a mid one for 120+ mil you’ve still inflated the market.