Reply
  • May 16, 2025
    Purrp

    I thought it was boring

  • Purrp 🌚
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Bro0o0ses

    Did you know that purrp is actually also learning to speak Spanish

    I do speak Spanish actually just not always good !

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Like a Camillimane

    @Extraterrestrial @Echiham i went into the bookexpecting absurdism and a few other things because of what ET said. Meursault is clearly a nihilist and i think if there's an actual meaning/lesson from the book it's Camus shaming and condemning him and anyone like him (anti hero, loner, nihilist, directionless individuals). I didn't know if i was supposed to pardon him or feel sympathy for him but regardless i will and any reader i think will judge him which is the point of the entire book. Us the reader will attach meaning and look for answers throughout the book and especially towards the end of the second act after Meursault has committed a murder, even if Meursault thinks it's meaningless and insignificant. I think a redundant and too simplistic way to look at the book is to say Camus is saying life is meaningless therefore morality and principles can be left behind but i think he's just saying life has no objective meaning which can lead to a lack of morals in certain personalities. I think through the story itself he highlights people will regardless attach meaning to life and the choices we make and that morality and principles will have influence on how 1 person acts and responds to situations in life.

    TLDR: meaning and morals are all subjective but that doesn't make them non existent or less important

    This makes me want u to read the book sounds interesting

  • May 16, 2025
    Purrp

    I do speak Spanish actually just not always good !

    Speak more

  • e t 👽
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    Like a Camillimane

    @Extraterrestrial @Echiham i went into the bookexpecting absurdism and a few other things because of what ET said. Meursault is clearly a nihilist and i think if there's an actual meaning/lesson from the book it's Camus shaming and condemning him and anyone like him (anti hero, loner, nihilist, directionless individuals). I didn't know if i was supposed to pardon him or feel sympathy for him but regardless i will and any reader i think will judge him which is the point of the entire book. Us the reader will attach meaning and look for answers throughout the book and especially towards the end of the second act after Meursault has committed a murder, even if Meursault thinks it's meaningless and insignificant. I think a redundant and too simplistic way to look at the book is to say Camus is saying life is meaningless therefore morality and principles can be left behind but i think he's just saying life has no objective meaning which can lead to a lack of morals in certain personalities. I think through the story itself he highlights people will regardless attach meaning to life and the choices we make and that morality and principles will have influence on how 1 person acts and responds to situations in life.

    TLDR: meaning and morals are all subjective but that doesn't make them non existent or less important

    Interesting. I see some of that. I got a different interpretation though. I took it as a commentary on society and how people will villainize someone over entirely absurd things. And felt it was still super relevant today. The whole trial and the lawyer saying that he must be guilty because “he didn’t cry at his mother’s funeral”. And how that was much more of the focus of the trial than the actual crime.

    Society expected these things of him, and since he didn’t live up to societal expectation, he must be a horrible broken POS. Lot of parallels today with cancel culture and forcing people to use or not use specific words, etc. as the main deciding factor of whether they are a good person or not, despite it not actually being relevant to that.

  • BIG early ⏱️
    May 16, 2025
    Purrp

    ??

    you missed out on recent lore

    return home…

  • BIG early ⏱️
    May 16, 2025
    THEREALHNDRXXFREE

    This makes me want u to read the book sounds interesting

    almost joined the book club after skimming this ngl

    too bad i have s*** attention span

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    3 replies
    e t

    Interesting. I see some of that. I got a different interpretation though. I took it as a commentary on society and how people will villainize someone over entirely absurd things. And felt it was still super relevant today. The whole trial and the lawyer saying that he must be guilty because “he didn’t cry at his mother’s funeral”. And how that was much more of the focus of the trial than the actual crime.

    Society expected these things of him, and since he didn’t live up to societal expectation, he must be a horrible broken POS. Lot of parallels today with cancel culture and forcing people to use or not use specific words, etc. as the main deciding factor of whether they are a good person or not, despite it not actually being relevant to that.

    Et after reading green eggs and ham: oh yeah I definitely can see how this relates to modern cancel culture. Take that liberals

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    3 replies

    My ktt is acting hella weird

  • BIG early ⏱️
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Bro0o0ses

    Et after reading green eggs and ham: oh yeah I definitely can see how this relates to modern cancel culture. Take that liberals

  • May 16, 2025
    EchiSlayyy

    My ktt is acting hella weird

    Just admit u dont want to speak about the book

  • May 16, 2025

    Emotional Oranges deliver bops

  • May 16, 2025
    BIG early

    All I'm saying is keep the green eggs and ham in your own dining room and stop trying to force it on me

  • e t 👽
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    4 replies
    Bro0o0ses

    Et after reading green eggs and ham: oh yeah I definitely can see how this relates to modern cancel culture. Take that liberals

    Basically the book centers around two main plot points. 1. The main characters mom dies and he takes care of her funeral arrangements. 2. The main character kills someone and gets put on trial.

    During the trial, the lawyer basically entirely ignores the murder, and convinces the jury that the main character deserves death because “he didn’t cry at his moms funeral” and “he drank coffee at the funeral home”

  • May 16, 2025
    e t

    Interesting. I see some of that. I got a different interpretation though. I took it as a commentary on society and how people will villainize someone over entirely absurd things. And felt it was still super relevant today. The whole trial and the lawyer saying that he must be guilty because “he didn’t cry at his mother’s funeral”. And how that was much more of the focus of the trial than the actual crime.

    Society expected these things of him, and since he didn’t live up to societal expectation, he must be a horrible broken POS. Lot of parallels today with cancel culture and forcing people to use or not use specific words, etc. as the main deciding factor of whether they are a good person or not, despite it not actually being relevant to that.

    yeah that's true i wanted to mention the whole trial and courtroom scenes and how the lawyer was grilling him because he didn't express any emotion over his mom's death but it didn't fit into my narrative as nicely. I can see the parallels with it today, the whole jury and trial reminded me of social media and how random people play armchair psychiatrist online and attack other's for not acting the way they expect

  • BIG early ⏱️
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    e t

    Basically the book centers around two main plot points. 1. The main characters mom dies and he takes care of her funeral arrangements. 2. The main character kills someone and gets put on trial.

    During the trial, the lawyer basically entirely ignores the murder, and convinces the jury that the main character deserves death because “he didn’t cry at his moms funeral” and “he drank coffee at the funeral home”

    let’s discuss 12 angry men

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    e t

    Basically the book centers around two main plot points. 1. The main characters mom dies and he takes care of her funeral arrangements. 2. The main character kills someone and gets put on trial.

    During the trial, the lawyer basically entirely ignores the murder, and convinces the jury that the main character deserves death because “he didn’t cry at his moms funeral” and “he drank coffee at the funeral home”

    Meursault didn't enjoy much besides his coffee and cream and some smokes

  • May 16, 2025
    Bro0o0ses

    Et after reading green eggs and ham: oh yeah I definitely can see how this relates to modern cancel culture. Take that liberals

  • e t 👽
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    BIG early

    let’s discuss 12 angry men

    I’ve never seen it

  • BIG early ⏱️
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    e t

    I’ve never seen it

    read it and we’ll spin back to this

    watching it doesn’t benefit as much as reading

    it’s a small screenplay

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    BIG early

    read it and we’ll spin back to this

    watching it doesn’t benefit as much as reading

    it’s a small screenplay

    i've seen the family guy parody episode

  • May 16, 2025

    he's also definitely autistic/on the spectrum but i don't think camus knew about autism back in the early 20th century

  • BIG early ⏱️
    May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply
    Like a Camillimane

    i've seen the family guy parody episode

    i think i slightly recall that, link it

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    2 replies
    BIG early

    i think i slightly recall that, link it

  • May 16, 2025
    ·
    1 reply

    Jodeci back