Reply
  • If an anime is on netflix i brush it off. Its means its probably s***. Excluding one piece

  • e t

    Date with me

    The lead-up: Electric and slightly destabilizing. The charisma is real and it’s aimed right at you. But you’ll never quite know if he’s being sincere or running a bit, because he delivers both in the exact same deadpan. The date got confirmed and you’re still not sure whether it was his idea or yours.

    The venue: He picked it, it’s cooler than anywhere you’d have chosen, and he’s slightly amused that you’re impressed. He sets the weather in every room he’s in and this restaurant’s no exception. The staff might already know him. Someone might already hate him. Both are on brand.

    The conversation: The best and most disorienting of any date here. Razor-sharp, very funny, takes dropped at speed — “fym Utopia was mid? you paying for your own dinner.” Half joking. The other half he means completely. You’ll laugh a lot and win zero arguments. He doesn’t concede, he reframes until you’ve forgotten what you were debating.

    The flashes of realness: Every so often something genuine slips through the irony — “sorry if I’m insecure,” a sudden “what if I’m dead tho, raw thoughts” out of nowhere. These are real. But he’ll wrap them in a joke a half-second later so you can’t hold them. He has no register for being serious that the room can receive as serious, and that’s the whole puzzle of him.

    The wildcard: This is a guy who catfished someone as their ex for five months and announced it casually, who claimed to get someone banned by paying a mod, who believes (or “believes”) lizard people killed a man. The chaos is real and load-bearing. You are not dating a calm person. You’re dating a force.

    The heat: Intense, a little controlling, definitely the type who notices everything. He mentioned a partner once monitored his online activity for cheating — read into the dynamic what you will. He runs hot and plays to win.

    The catch: You’ll leave completely charmed and with no idea where you actually stand, because he made sure of it. The most fun you’ll have and the least ground under your feet. Everyone in the thread orbits him. You’re about to find out why — and why nobody’s ever quite escaped.

    How it ends: On his terms, brilliantly, with a line so good you won’t realize till later that he never actually answered whether he likes you. You’ll text first. You already know you will.

    looks like ur a bottom too

  • “The wildcard: This is a guy who catfished someone as their ex for five months and announced it casually, who claimed to get someone banned by paying a mod, who believes (or “believes”) lizard people killed a man. The chaos is real and load-bearing. You are not dating a calm person. You’re dating a force.“

    crine

  • UncMC 🏦
    ·
    1 reply
    CutiePieHole

    Oh this looks like smething nazis would love to edit a certain symbol onto . Looks cool though

    It’s set in ww1 Germany I think

  • rvi 🦤
    e t

    The lead-up: Hard to read. rvi keeps himself intentionally opaque — he’s the guy who’ll say something like “a VZ user active now has seen my face before, I think” and then not elaborate. Getting a clear yes to the date takes some decoding. He releases information on a need-to-know basis and he decides what you need to know.

    The venue: Somewhere with a bit of an edge — not flashy, but curated. He has taste and he’s a little precious about it. Wherever it is, he chose it for a specific reason he may or may not disclose.

    The conversation: This is where rvi is quietly excellent. He’s one of the sharper observers in the thread — he’s the guy who noticed that if you say you prefer any artist to Kendrick without dissing him, everyone goes nuts. He watches patterns. He’ll clock things about you three sentences in and mention one just to see your face. Unnerving and kind of magnetic.

    The mystery: There’s a documented “gray pants incident” he refuses to explain. There will be an rvi equivalent on your date — some reference to a story he won’t finish, a detail he drops and pulls back. He’s not playing hard to get, he genuinely operates at a low information-release rate. You’ll spend the night wanting the full story and getting 60% of it.

    The music: Real knowledge, lightly worn. He won’t lecture you like HNDRXX or quiz you like Kodak — he’ll drop one perfect, slightly-obscure observation and let it land. His MJ takes get people going. He knows exactly how much to say to be interesting and stops one sentence earlier than you want.

    The vibe: Cool, dry, a little detached — but the detachment is a filter, not a wall. Get past it and there’s genuine warmth and a sharp sense of humor underneath. He’s testing whether you’re paying attention.

    The catch: You will not get a full read on this man in one date. Possibly not in ten. He likes it that way. If you need someone who’s an open book, this is the wrong table — but if you like the slow reveal, rvi is the most intriguing person in the thread.

    How it ends: Ambiguously, on purpose. A look, a half-smile, a “we’ll see.” You won’t know where you stand and that’s precisely the effect he was going for. Bring patience and a good memory — he’ll test both.

    mysterious user

  • rvi 🦤
    CutiePieHole

    Its done. That means less thread too probably. Manh will celebrate… but i am doing this for my brain health,

    im proud of you

  • rvi 🦤
    CutiePieHole

    Whats the gray pants incident @RVI

    no idea

    maybe something about the gray sweatpants type of meme

  • ·
    1 reply
    e t

    Date with me

    The lead-up: Electric and slightly destabilizing. The charisma is real and it’s aimed right at you. But you’ll never quite know if he’s being sincere or running a bit, because he delivers both in the exact same deadpan. The date got confirmed and you’re still not sure whether it was his idea or yours.

    The venue: He picked it, it’s cooler than anywhere you’d have chosen, and he’s slightly amused that you’re impressed. He sets the weather in every room he’s in and this restaurant’s no exception. The staff might already know him. Someone might already hate him. Both are on brand.

    The conversation: The best and most disorienting of any date here. Razor-sharp, very funny, takes dropped at speed — “fym Utopia was mid? you paying for your own dinner.” Half joking. The other half he means completely. You’ll laugh a lot and win zero arguments. He doesn’t concede, he reframes until you’ve forgotten what you were debating.

    The flashes of realness: Every so often something genuine slips through the irony — “sorry if I’m insecure,” a sudden “what if I’m dead tho, raw thoughts” out of nowhere. These are real. But he’ll wrap them in a joke a half-second later so you can’t hold them. He has no register for being serious that the room can receive as serious, and that’s the whole puzzle of him.

    The wildcard: This is a guy who catfished someone as their ex for five months and announced it casually, who claimed to get someone banned by paying a mod, who believes (or “believes”) lizard people killed a man. The chaos is real and load-bearing. You are not dating a calm person. You’re dating a force.

    The heat: Intense, a little controlling, definitely the type who notices everything. He mentioned a partner once monitored his online activity for cheating — read into the dynamic what you will. He runs hot and plays to win.

    The catch: You’ll leave completely charmed and with no idea where you actually stand, because he made sure of it. The most fun you’ll have and the least ground under your feet. Everyone in the thread orbits him. You’re about to find out why — and why nobody’s ever quite escaped.

    How it ends: On his terms, brilliantly, with a line so good you won’t realize till later that he never actually answered whether he likes you. You’ll text first. You already know you will.

    Im choosing dinner with ET over Hov now

  • e t 🇺🇸
    ·
    6 replies

    Asked for the top 3 potential couples in the thread based on compatibility

    1. Bruises + Tuneout
    The healthiest pairing in the thread by a mile. Two genuinely warm, low-drama people who love music without weaponizing it. Bruises brings the grounded, kids-first stability; Tuneout brings the easygoing, self-aware sweetness. Neither one plays games, neither one tests the other, and both would rather close down a cozy bar talking than perform for anyone. No volatility to manage. This one just works.

    2. ET + Kodak Spice
    Not healthy — but combustibly compatible. Both live in the same city, both run hot, both are the most intense presences in the thread. They already have a documented volatile dynamic, which is exactly why it’d work: neither would be overwhelmed by the other’s intensity because they match it exactly. Kodak’s need to be seen meets ET’s need to be the center — dangerous, magnetic, and neither would ever get bored. High burn rate. Worth it.

    3. back 2 black + Allison Wanderland
    The soul-and-warmth pairing. back2black named his son after D’Angelo; Allison is the thread’s most spiritually-attuned R&B head who stops conversations to check whether something “vibes right with her soul.” They’d talk about music the same way — reverent, emotional, historically deep — and both lead with kindness. Allison’s “praying for you beloved” energy meets back2black’s genuine openness. A gentle, grown, actually-loving match.

  • ·
    2 replies
    UncMC

    It’s set in ww1 Germany I think

    germany took on the world back to back and almost won

    crazy work ethic

  • ·
    1 reply
    e t

    Asked for the top 3 potential couples in the thread based on compatibility

    1. Bruises + Tuneout
    The healthiest pairing in the thread by a mile. Two genuinely warm, low-drama people who love music without weaponizing it. Bruises brings the grounded, kids-first stability; Tuneout brings the easygoing, self-aware sweetness. Neither one plays games, neither one tests the other, and both would rather close down a cozy bar talking than perform for anyone. No volatility to manage. This one just works.

    2. ET + Kodak Spice
    Not healthy — but combustibly compatible. Both live in the same city, both run hot, both are the most intense presences in the thread. They already have a documented volatile dynamic, which is exactly why it’d work: neither would be overwhelmed by the other’s intensity because they match it exactly. Kodak’s need to be seen meets ET’s need to be the center — dangerous, magnetic, and neither would ever get bored. High burn rate. Worth it.

    3. back 2 black + Allison Wanderland
    The soul-and-warmth pairing. back2black named his son after D’Angelo; Allison is the thread’s most spiritually-attuned R&B head who stops conversations to check whether something “vibes right with her soul.” They’d talk about music the same way — reverent, emotional, historically deep — and both lead with kindness. Allison’s “praying for you beloved” energy meets back2black’s genuine openness. A gentle, grown, actually-loving match.

    @AllisonXO

  • ·
    1 reply
    e t

    Asked for the top 3 potential couples in the thread based on compatibility

    1. Bruises + Tuneout
    The healthiest pairing in the thread by a mile. Two genuinely warm, low-drama people who love music without weaponizing it. Bruises brings the grounded, kids-first stability; Tuneout brings the easygoing, self-aware sweetness. Neither one plays games, neither one tests the other, and both would rather close down a cozy bar talking than perform for anyone. No volatility to manage. This one just works.

    2. ET + Kodak Spice
    Not healthy — but combustibly compatible. Both live in the same city, both run hot, both are the most intense presences in the thread. They already have a documented volatile dynamic, which is exactly why it’d work: neither would be overwhelmed by the other’s intensity because they match it exactly. Kodak’s need to be seen meets ET’s need to be the center — dangerous, magnetic, and neither would ever get bored. High burn rate. Worth it.

    3. back 2 black + Allison Wanderland
    The soul-and-warmth pairing. back2black named his son after D’Angelo; Allison is the thread’s most spiritually-attuned R&B head who stops conversations to check whether something “vibes right with her soul.” They’d talk about music the same way — reverent, emotional, historically deep — and both lead with kindness. Allison’s “praying for you beloved” energy meets back2black’s genuine openness. A gentle, grown, actually-loving match.

    Warm and low drama is a ridiculous description of me

  • e t

    Asked for the top 3 potential couples in the thread based on compatibility

    1. Bruises + Tuneout
    The healthiest pairing in the thread by a mile. Two genuinely warm, low-drama people who love music without weaponizing it. Bruises brings the grounded, kids-first stability; Tuneout brings the easygoing, self-aware sweetness. Neither one plays games, neither one tests the other, and both would rather close down a cozy bar talking than perform for anyone. No volatility to manage. This one just works.

    2. ET + Kodak Spice
    Not healthy — but combustibly compatible. Both live in the same city, both run hot, both are the most intense presences in the thread. They already have a documented volatile dynamic, which is exactly why it’d work: neither would be overwhelmed by the other’s intensity because they match it exactly. Kodak’s need to be seen meets ET’s need to be the center — dangerous, magnetic, and neither would ever get bored. High burn rate. Worth it.

    3. back 2 black + Allison Wanderland
    The soul-and-warmth pairing. back2black named his son after D’Angelo; Allison is the thread’s most spiritually-attuned R&B head who stops conversations to check whether something “vibes right with her soul.” They’d talk about music the same way — reverent, emotional, historically deep — and both lead with kindness. Allison’s “praying for you beloved” energy meets back2black’s genuine openness. A gentle, grown, actually-loving match.

    Yesss

    Bruises tuneout is canon

  • ·
    1 reply

    Tunesies

  • ·
    1 reply
    THEREALHNDRXXFREE

    Tunesies

    ??

  • e t 🇺🇸
    ·
    1 reply
    Bruuiisees

    Warm and low drama is a ridiculous description of me

    I think it’s basing it on how you talk to Tuneout which is probably nicer than others

  • ·
    1 reply
    Like a Camillimane

    @AllisonXO

    Allison x saveme was so powerful it keep gettings referenced 80k pages later

  • Like a Camillimane

    ??

    Thats the ship name?

  • ·
    1 reply
    e t

    I think it’s basing it on how you talk to Tuneout which is probably nicer than others

    Do top 3 worst couples

  • e t

    Asked for the top 3 potential couples in the thread based on compatibility

    1. Bruises + Tuneout
    The healthiest pairing in the thread by a mile. Two genuinely warm, low-drama people who love music without weaponizing it. Bruises brings the grounded, kids-first stability; Tuneout brings the easygoing, self-aware sweetness. Neither one plays games, neither one tests the other, and both would rather close down a cozy bar talking than perform for anyone. No volatility to manage. This one just works.

    2. ET + Kodak Spice
    Not healthy — but combustibly compatible. Both live in the same city, both run hot, both are the most intense presences in the thread. They already have a documented volatile dynamic, which is exactly why it’d work: neither would be overwhelmed by the other’s intensity because they match it exactly. Kodak’s need to be seen meets ET’s need to be the center — dangerous, magnetic, and neither would ever get bored. High burn rate. Worth it.

    3. back 2 black + Allison Wanderland
    The soul-and-warmth pairing. back2black named his son after D’Angelo; Allison is the thread’s most spiritually-attuned R&B head who stops conversations to check whether something “vibes right with her soul.” They’d talk about music the same way — reverent, emotional, historically deep — and both lead with kindness. Allison’s “praying for you beloved” energy meets back2black’s genuine openness. A gentle, grown, actually-loving match.

    Ok obviously im not in these pages right….

  • THEREALHNDRXXFREE

    Allison x saveme was so powerful it keep gettings referenced 80k pages later

  • EchiRodrigo

    Im choosing dinner with ET over Hov now

  • e t 🇺🇸
    ·
    1 reply
    THEREALHNDRXXFREE

    Do top 3 worst couples

    1. ET + Kodak Spice
    Yes, I called them “combustibly compatible” earlier — and that’s exactly why they’re also the worst possible couple. Two people who both run maximum intensity, both need to be the center, both take everything personally, and both live in the same city so there’s no distance buffer. They already have a documented volatile dynamic. As a couple that’s not spark, it’s a grease fire — every disagreement escalates because neither one de-escalates, ET reframes until Kodak spirals, Kodak spirals until ET weaponizes it, and one of them ends up catfishing the other as revenge. The breakup would take down the entire thread. Compatible in chemistry, apocalyptic in practice.

    2. COWBOY ARTIST + Kodak Spice
    The single most unstable pairing you could assemble. Kodak needs reassurance and reads everything as a personal slight; COWBOY ARTIST is broadcasting depravity on an open channel and would say something unspeakable at the exact wrong moment with zero awareness it landed wrong. Kodak would spiral into “you think I’m subhuman waste,” Artist would respond with “Mmm, cum,” and it would somehow get worse from there. One person seeking emotional safety, one person who is constitutionally incapable of providing it. Catastrophic.

    3. Wesley + Camille
    The ideological war. Both are stubborn, both deliver opinions as objective fact, and they’re on opposite sides of the thread’s holy war — Camille is the Drake supremacist (“we compare Drake to Al Capone”), Wesley is the guy who hated Drake before it was cool and would die for Kendrick. Put them in a relationship and every single dinner becomes a VZ. Neither concedes anything, ever. It’s not that they don’t have chemistry — it’s that they’d spend the entire relationship trying to win it, and two people who both need to be right can’t share a table, let alone a life.

  • Nee arca on friday