Reply
  • ·
    2 replies
    Tuneout

    so every insane thing is common sense now

    Every insane thing has “common sense” behind it.

    The earth is obviously flat. When I walk outside, the ground is flat. You’d be crazy to believe it’s round. It’s just common sense

  • Tuneout 🎨
    ·
    1 reply
    wey

    I’m afraid every time ET and broosie argue

    ET makes a point

    Bruises explains why it’s not a good point

    Et tries to steer the conversation to become more general and larger in scale

  • UncMC 🪕
    ·
    1 reply
    Poopfeast420

    Every insane thing has “common sense” behind it.

    The earth is obviously flat. When I walk outside, the ground is flat. You’d be crazy to believe it’s round. It’s just common sense

    You can’t just change the definition of common sense bruh

  • Tuneout 🎨
    ·
    1 reply
    Poopfeast420

    Every insane thing has “common sense” behind it.

    The earth is obviously flat. When I walk outside, the ground is flat. You’d be crazy to believe it’s round. It’s just common sense

    et “ there is no scale “

    in response to bmass saying he tries to steer the convo to be more general and larger in scale

  • ·
    1 reply
    Poopfeast420

    There’s no scale. Contextually, a code of silence isn’t blackmail. Whether there’s evidence or not makes zero difference. One person going to the police and confessing is enough. If that’s not
    blackmail, then adding evidence to it isn’t either

    Evidence being kept by one party doesn't make the difference between something being or not being blackmail? That's the argument you're making?

  • UncMC

    You can’t just change the definition of common sense bruh

    Common sense is entirely subjective bro. What you think is common sense is not what someone else thinks is common sense. Two exact opposite viewpoints can both be based on common sense

  • What do you think blackmail is if it's not that

  • ·
    2 replies
    Tuneout

    et “ there is no scale “

    in response to bmass saying he tries to steer the convo to be more general and larger in scale

    I wasn’t trying to is what I meant. You either accept a code of silence isn’t blackmail or you don’t. People don’t refer to that as blackmail.

  • Poopfeast420

    I wasn’t trying to is what I meant. You either accept a code of silence isn’t blackmail or you don’t. People don’t refer to that as blackmail.

    Its not just a code of silence stop being intentionally vague

    No one is trying to say just a code of silence is blackmail

    Its a code of silence where one person is keeping evidence of the other party

  • Bruuiisees

    Evidence being kept by one party doesn't make the difference between something being or not being blackmail? That's the argument you're making?

    No, the argument I’m making is that you’re using semantics to try to define blackmail literally. Whereas I’m saying a code of silence isn’t blackmail in a conversational sense.

  • Tuneout 🎨
    ·
    1 reply
    Poopfeast420

    I wasn’t trying to is what I meant. You either accept a code of silence isn’t blackmail or you don’t. People don’t refer to that as blackmail.

    most people absolutely accept that if you secretly recorded somebody raping children and then hold onto it, thats blackmail. even if youre in it raping too

  • wey

    I’m afraid every time ET and broosie argue

    ET makes a point

    Bruises explains why it’s not a good point

    Et tries to steer the conversation to become more general and larger in scale

    He is a nice man but he argues like the most bad faith prick in the world

  • ·
    1 reply
    Tuneout

    most people absolutely accept that if you secretly recorded somebody raping children and then hold onto it, thats blackmail. even if youre in it raping too

    If you’re using it to obtain money or favors, yes. If it’s solely part of a code of silence, no, not in the way that the average person thinks or talks about blackmail.

  • Tuneout 🎨
    ·
    1 reply
    Poopfeast420

    If you’re using it to obtain money or favors, yes. If it’s solely part of a code of silence, no, not in the way that the average person thinks or talks about blackmail.

    yes it is

  • Tuneout 🎨
    ·
    1 reply

    and more importantly its the defitnion of blackmail lol

  • UncMC

    You lied to me

    ok but listenn nothing to do tomorrow what am i rushing for

  • Tuneout

    yes it is

    Nobody defines it as blackmail.

    Two men kill someone. One keeps the murder weapon, the other keeps the victim’s bloody shirt. To ensure a code of silence.

    It’s not blackmail the way people think about blackmail.

  • wey 🇵🇭

    Bruises is a trooper

  • wey 🇵🇭
    ·
    1 reply

    Good night beautiful people itt

  • wey

    Good night beautiful people itt

  • ·
    2 replies
    Tuneout

    and more importantly its the defitnion of blackmail lol

    Again, you want to argue semantics. No one’s first thought on a code of silence would be blackmail.

    Adultery is having s***with someone that’s not your spouse. If you found out that a couple had a threesome, you could say they committed adultery. Nobody would say that though because that’s not how we conversationally define adultery, even though it fits the literal definition.

    Idk how else to get this across

  • I want a 400 pounds person on my back crack it

  • ·
    1 reply

    This argument is being attributed to me but for 99% of its duration it was just et and Tuneout

  • Tuneout 🎨
    ·
    1 reply
    Poopfeast420

    Again, you want to argue semantics. No one’s first thought on a code of silence would be blackmail.

    Adultery is having s***with someone that’s not your spouse. If you found out that a couple had a threesome, you could say they committed adultery. Nobody would say that though because that’s not how we conversationally define adultery, even though it fits the literal definition.

    Idk how else to get this across

    ironic u are accusing me of arguing semantics lol thats like your go to