Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Oct 14, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply

    twitter not letting you tweet out the hunter biden leaks is such bs

  • Oct 14, 2020

    No way Barron got Covid too

  • Oct 14, 2020

    Hilarious that the one freedom Barrett happens to forget is the right to protest

  • Oct 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Monky business

    twitter not letting you tweet out the hunter biden leaks is such bs

    It’s a rule against distribution of hacked material. Which makes sense. They did the same thing when Andrew Gillium’s meth binge nudes leaked

  • Oct 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    krishna bound

    She didn’t really “refuse to answer” though, she just said you can’t apply to law arbitrary to vague hypotheticals, which honestly isn’t wrong under how US legal framework works, albeit this is obviously different than other countries

    Dumb. What if Klob asked “Is it illegal to murder somebody?”

    could she not answer ?

  • Oct 14, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Lou

    It’s a rule against distribution of hacked material. Which makes sense. They did the same thing when Andrew Gillium’s meth binge nudes leaked

    I really don’t buy that considering, if you find the article on twitter, they now show a pop up saying the site is not safe. Regardless, I don’t think this policy should be enforced as it is especially with journalism

  • Oct 14, 2020
    Lou

    Dumb. What if Klob asked “Is it illegal to murder somebody?”

    could she not answer ?

    i mean...yes? "Murder" cases are contextual too. See self-defense shootings, i.e. DaBaby; law in the US isn't based on intrinsic action it's based on context and precedent.

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Monky business

    I really don’t buy that considering, if you find the article on twitter, they now show a pop up saying the site is not safe. Regardless, I don’t think this policy should be enforced as it is especially with journalism

    Its not journalism.

    Its an amateurish attempt at fraudulent disinformation during an election.

    That is why its being blocked.

  • Oct 15, 2020
    DwindlingSun

    Its not journalism.

    Its an amateurish attempt at fraudulent disinformation during an election.

    That is why its being blocked.

    they need to change the law and make twitter etc choose to be a platform or publisher

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    self destructing again

  • Oct 15, 2020
    K DOG 99

    From the article: Environmentalists were appalled—if not necessarily surprised—by Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett's statement Tuesday that she does not "have firm views" on climate change, an ostensibly neutral comment that critics said is tantamount to denial of the science.

    "Quite simply, if you're neutral on climate change, you're complicit in the collapse of the planetary ecosystem upon which the survival of every living thing depends," meteorologist Eric Holthaus wrote late Tuesday in response to Barrett's remarks.

    Asked by Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.)—an outspoken opponent of bold climate action—whether she has "opinions" on climate change, Barrett said during Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that she is "certainly not a scientist."

    shes so awful

    This how Barrett be answering questions

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    DwindlingSun

    Its not journalism.

    Its an amateurish attempt at fraudulent disinformation during an election.

    That is why its being blocked.

    how do we know it’s disinformation and why was that not immediately said as the reason

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    It’s so weird when we have journalists now acting like these wacko trumpists.

    Many other media outlets have disproved the s*** in your article, don’t be mad social media platforms are blocking your attempt at mass disinformation.

    Editor for NY Post everyone. Talking like Trump in over exaggerating just for the clicks and the Trump retweet.

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Monky business

    how do we know it’s disinformation and why was that not immediately said as the reason

    This should not have to be spelled out. Its more effort to actually believe something so obviously contrived. In the time you took wanting to post the story you should have researched it.

    For starters, the story does not make an ounce of sense. Numerous details in Isaac's narrative are missing, others contradict one another or he himself flip flops between them. He himself is far from stable.
    thedailybeast.com/man-who-reportedly-gave-hunters-laptop-to-rudy-speaks-out-in-bizarre-interview

    Not to mention just the simple absurdity that an anonymous person abandons a laptop containing the 'jackpot evidence' that Trump has been after all this time. And then this repair shop worker breaks every law under the sun in accessing and disseminating its information.

    Upon investigation of the metadata its abundantly obvious that the purported emails were forged. And its hardly a promising sign when NYPost are refusing to provide the DKIM signature to verify them.

    eddiekrassenstein.medium.com/alleged-hunter-biden-email-from-giuliani-appears-forged-2d55b08140cc

    NYPost are an awful outlet, its quite clear they didn't care about verifying the story. And this isn't the first time they've done things like this. In addition, there are elements of their story that we already know as false. Biden did not have the Ukrainian prosecutor fired because he was investigating Burisma. That's a fabrication. nytimes.com/2016/03/30/world/europe/political-stability-in-the-balance-as-ukraine-ousts-top-prosecutor.html

    I'm not sure what you mean by why was that not immediately said as the reason? It was blocked so it could be fact-checked and within minutes reputable investigative journalists were calling it out as a fraudulent smear job.

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    DwindlingSun

    This should not have to be spelled out. Its more effort to actually believe something so obviously contrived. In the time you took wanting to post the story you should have researched it.

    For starters, the story does not make an ounce of sense. Numerous details in Isaac's narrative are missing, others contradict one another or he himself flip flops between them. He himself is far from stable.
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/man-who-reportedly-gave-hunters-laptop-to-rudy-speaks-out-in-bizarre-interview

    Not to mention just the simple absurdity that an anonymous person abandons a laptop containing the 'jackpot evidence' that Trump has been after all this time. And then this repair shop worker breaks every law under the sun in accessing and disseminating its information.

    Upon investigation of the metadata its abundantly obvious that the purported emails were forged. And its hardly a promising sign when NYPost are refusing to provide the DKIM signature to verify them.

    https://twitter.com/RidT/status/1316441781043712005https://twitter.com/kyleehmke/status/1316527714841571328

    https://eddiekrassenstein.medium.com/alleged-hunter-biden-email-from-giuliani-appears-forged-2d55b08140cc

    NYPost are an awful outlet, its quite clear they didn't care about verifying the story. And this isn't the first time they've done things like this. In addition, there are elements of their story that we already know as false. Biden did not have the Ukrainian prosecutor fired because he was investigating Burisma. That's a fabrication. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/30/world/europe/political-stability-in-the-balance-as-ukraine-ousts-top-prosecutor.html

    I'm not sure what you mean by why was that not immediately said as the reason? It was blocked so it could be fact-checked and within minutes reputable investigative journalists were calling it out as a fraudulent smear job.

    https://twitter.com/andymstone/status/1316395902479872000

    I see. I only ever read into the Washington Post article debunking it and some of the authors tweets.

  • Oct 15, 2020
    Monky business

    I see. I only ever read into the Washington Post article debunking it and some of the authors tweets.

    For the record, I am still pretty conflicted on Twitter's decision. The article is sleazy, sure, but you could do the same in plenty of other situations. The Steele dossier comes to mind. First we were lead on to believe it was removed because of hacked material. Later it said the NY Post website wasn't safe. If you're gonna do something this big, the intent should have been clear immediately. @DwindlingSun I do think Facebook handled it correctly, though.

  • Oct 15, 2020

    YouTube banned a few Qanon channels today

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    inb4 war criminal

    inb4 synopsis places a curse upon a thousand generations of my family

    barry o make some good points

  • Oct 15, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    spongebob
    !https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ok5-lN3Klyo

    inb4 war criminal

    inb4 synopsis places a curse upon a thousand generations of my family

    barry o make some good points

    Barry just understands the game

  • Oct 16, 2020
    Fundamentals

    Barry just understands the game

    Tbh

    A lot of dudes on here are blind and pretend there is no game.

  • Oct 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    In other news, I have no idea how my state is filled with such morons that have voted for Feinstein's corrupt old ass year after year. She really hugged Lady G with no mask

  • Oct 16, 2020

    his aides really have no idea what they're doing

  • Oct 16, 2020

    💅🏽 Let’s get this .
    Vote Blue

  • Oct 16, 2020
    SBMike

    It’s so weird when we have journalists now acting like these wacko trumpists.

    Many other media outlets have disproved the s*** in your article, don’t be mad social media platforms are blocking your attempt at mass disinformation.

    https://twitter.com/sohrabahmari/status/1316446749729398790

    Editor for NY Post everyone. Talking like Trump in over exaggerating just for the clicks and the Trump retweet.

    twitter told em "go back to the drafts and lets see u pull this s*** again"

  • Oct 16, 2020
    Young D

    In other news, I have no idea how my state is filled with such morons that have voted for Feinstein's corrupt old ass year after year. She really hugged Lady G with no mask

    87 years old def in touch with the times no issues there

Thread was locked by
a moderator