If they're suspending/delaying it this quickly after their announcement expect another delay. Then another delay. Until the creator realizes he's dumb as f*** and is about to lose a ton of money if he bans it cause nobody going on Onlyfans to watch random people play violin for 10 bucks a month.
lmao dude aint gonna lose a ton of money from not having p***.
Nord VPN and Raid Shadow Legends ad revenue dont hit like Coca Cola's does.
was strange seeing banks trying to take the moral highground
Well someone made a good point about the company girlsdoporn where they all got busted for trafficking. The morals are pretty more negative than positive where the profits ain't worth it
I hope she knows this doesn’t make her look any better lmao
It do though lol, she playing the other girl like a chump and making cash
New York Times think pieces dropping
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1430515394943594501crine
Well someone made a good point about the company girlsdoporn where they all got busted for trafficking. The morals are pretty more negative than positive where the profits ain't worth it
you're right, but these banks already fund shady s*** where do you draw the line as to when the profits are worth it? guns/tobacco are okay but consensual s***is not?
you're right, but these banks already fund shady s*** where do you draw the line as to when the profits are worth it? guns/tobacco are okay but consensual s***is not?
people can only give consent to smoking. guns is tied with 2nd amendment. s***trafficking is a risk that banks don't see worth the profit is what I can see in their line of thinking.
It do though lol, she playing the other girl like a chump and making cash
No lmao
"I can't sell my body online? I guess I'll have to sell my body in person"
Have some more respect for yourself
one thing i dont get each time onlyfans gets some news, is all of a sudden their content creators get this ‘poor vulnerable s***worker’ tag as if they selling big issue magazines. its all business man
people can only give consent to smoking. guns is tied with 2nd amendment. s***trafficking is a risk that banks don't see worth the profit is what I can see in their line of thinking.
sorry don't get the smoking point,
you're only looking at guns from an American POV and not the rest of the world where ther eis no such amendment right. and that's before you even get into Banks funding companies in the arms trade e.g. funding the syrian (or other) government or any other conflict killing innocent lives
This isn't really a girlsdoporn scenario. The creator on OF exerts an enormous amount of control which can be argued has done a lot to reduce the danger and violence from s***work. If banks cared about that aspect they should embrace it and clearly they have if they've now given assurances
sorry don't get the smoking point,
you're only looking at guns from an American POV and not the rest of the world where ther eis no such amendment right. and that's before you even get into Banks funding companies in the arms trade e.g. funding the syrian (or other) government or any other conflict killing innocent lives
This isn't really a girlsdoporn scenario. The creator on OF exerts an enormous amount of control which can be argued has done a lot to reduce the danger and violence from s***work. If banks cared about that aspect they should embrace it and clearly they have if they've now given assurances
I agree for sure. I'm just explaining how I saw it was explained to me
my credit card thought it was safe for a bit