Jul 21, 2023What y’all think?
- Jul 21, 2023
I watched in Dolby.
Somehow don’t think this “needed” 70MM IMAX? I’m planning on doing a watch in a 70MM imax in a couple weeks so maybe I’ll be eating my words
Jul 21, 2023·edited·21 repliesYeah. The visuals were good but it’s really not THAT visual of a movie to the point where IMAX is necessary to fully enjoy it.
As far as the movie in general there’s a lot of great scenes and performances in it, but I thought the pacing was bad.
The clearance hearing & Strauss stuff were not interesting enough to justify that much screen time. The movie even acknowledges it at the end “hey Strauss maybe Oppenheimer & Einstein were actually talking about something more important than you.” Exactly so why did we just spend an hour+ on Strauss?
Edit: after sitting on it for a while and getting my thoughts together ima just admit it; this movie was very disappointing.
It completely lacks a centerpiece. The test bomb did NOT do it. The movie is 2 hours of build-up and 1 hour of fallout with no climax. I understand that it would’ve been tough to depict tastefully, but Nolan needed to show something from Japan to showcase the horrors of what Oppenheimer had done.
As it stands the movie is just hours of guys in rooms telling us that bombs are bad. There’s no captivating debate here, there’s no tension. I don’t care about Oppenheimer’s security clearance. I don’t care about Strauss’s cabinet confirmation.
Jul 21, 2023·4 repliesTruman really said "get this crybaby ass nigga out my office" I was dying lmaoooo
Jul 21, 2023Spoiler movie for a historical event?
Jul 21, 2023The bomb explodes lol
Kr0niic ☘️Jul 21, 2023·1 replyBomb goes boom
Jul 21, 2023I came
- Jul 21, 2023ProhibitionDev
Truman really said "get this crybaby ass nigga out my office" I was dying lmaoooo
Anti-American propaganda smh
Niggamortis 👨🚀Jul 21, 2023·2 repliesWE WON???
- Jul 21, 2023russianbot23
Yeah. The visuals were good but it’s really not THAT visual of a movie to the point where IMAX is necessary to fully enjoy it.
As far as the movie in general there’s a lot of great scenes and performances in it, but I thought the pacing was bad.
The clearance hearing & Strauss stuff were not interesting enough to justify that much screen time. The movie even acknowledges it at the end “hey Strauss maybe Oppenheimer & Einstein were actually talking about something more important than you.” Exactly so why did we just spend an hour+ on Strauss?
Edit: after sitting on it for a while and getting my thoughts together ima just admit it; this movie was very disappointing.
It completely lacks a centerpiece. The test bomb did NOT do it. The movie is 2 hours of build-up and 1 hour of fallout with no climax. I understand that it would’ve been tough to depict tastefully, but Nolan needed to show something from Japan to showcase the horrors of what Oppenheimer had done.
As it stands the movie is just hours of guys in rooms telling us that bombs are bad. There’s no captivating debate here, there’s no tension. I don’t care about Oppenheimer’s security clearance. I don’t care about Strauss’s cabinet confirmation.
You get it
Jul 21, 2023·4 repliesEveryone warned Oppenheimer but nigga was crying at the end like he didn’t know the bomb would kill thousands
Jul 21, 2023·2 repliesscene where Florence pugh riding oppy in the middle of the testimony room was surprisingly surreal, didn't expect nolan to do stuff like that. easily my favorite parts of the movie.
Jul 21, 2023·1 replyThe detonation was ass. I know he didn’t use CGI but maybe he should’ve for that lol.
- Jul 21, 2023russianbot23
Yeah. The visuals were good but it’s really not THAT visual of a movie to the point where IMAX is necessary to fully enjoy it.
As far as the movie in general there’s a lot of great scenes and performances in it, but I thought the pacing was bad.
The clearance hearing & Strauss stuff were not interesting enough to justify that much screen time. The movie even acknowledges it at the end “hey Strauss maybe Oppenheimer & Einstein were actually talking about something more important than you.” Exactly so why did we just spend an hour+ on Strauss?
Edit: after sitting on it for a while and getting my thoughts together ima just admit it; this movie was very disappointing.
It completely lacks a centerpiece. The test bomb did NOT do it. The movie is 2 hours of build-up and 1 hour of fallout with no climax. I understand that it would’ve been tough to depict tastefully, but Nolan needed to show something from Japan to showcase the horrors of what Oppenheimer had done.
As it stands the movie is just hours of guys in rooms telling us that bombs are bad. There’s no captivating debate here, there’s no tension. I don’t care about Oppenheimer’s security clearance. I don’t care about Strauss’s cabinet confirmation.
Ima have to agree
Jul 21, 2023·1 replydo we really need a spoiler thread on historical events
Jul 21, 2023Oppen heims his er
Jul 21, 2023·3 repliesDialogue was impossible to understand at parts
Also had trouble remembering faces with names
I enjoyed dunkirk more than this
Jul 21, 2023Pinheaddo we really need a spoiler thread on historical events
Jul 21, 2023russianbot23Yeah. The visuals were good but it’s really not THAT visual of a movie to the point where IMAX is necessary to fully enjoy it.
As far as the movie in general there’s a lot of great scenes and performances in it, but I thought the pacing was bad.
The clearance hearing & Strauss stuff were not interesting enough to justify that much screen time. The movie even acknowledges it at the end “hey Strauss maybe Oppenheimer & Einstein were actually talking about something more important than you.” Exactly so why did we just spend an hour+ on Strauss?
Edit: after sitting on it for a while and getting my thoughts together ima just admit it; this movie was very disappointing.
It completely lacks a centerpiece. The test bomb did NOT do it. The movie is 2 hours of build-up and 1 hour of fallout with no climax. I understand that it would’ve been tough to depict tastefully, but Nolan needed to show something from Japan to showcase the horrors of what Oppenheimer had done.
As it stands the movie is just hours of guys in rooms telling us that bombs are bad. There’s no captivating debate here, there’s no tension. I don’t care about Oppenheimer’s security clearance. I don’t care about Strauss’s cabinet confirmation.
👏👏👏👏👏
We saw the same movie 👍
- Jul 21, 2023·2 replies
Might be my least favorite Nolan I’ve ever seen. This and Interstellar.
Dark Knight is in my top movies ever btw
Purrp 🌚Jul 21, 2023The bomb goes boom
- Purrp 🌚Jul 21, 2023Kr0niic
Bomb goes boom
F***
- Jul 21, 2023·1 replyrussianbot23
Yeah. The visuals were good but it’s really not THAT visual of a movie to the point where IMAX is necessary to fully enjoy it.
As far as the movie in general there’s a lot of great scenes and performances in it, but I thought the pacing was bad.
The clearance hearing & Strauss stuff were not interesting enough to justify that much screen time. The movie even acknowledges it at the end “hey Strauss maybe Oppenheimer & Einstein were actually talking about something more important than you.” Exactly so why did we just spend an hour+ on Strauss?
Edit: after sitting on it for a while and getting my thoughts together ima just admit it; this movie was very disappointing.
It completely lacks a centerpiece. The test bomb did NOT do it. The movie is 2 hours of build-up and 1 hour of fallout with no climax. I understand that it would’ve been tough to depict tastefully, but Nolan needed to show something from Japan to showcase the horrors of what Oppenheimer had done.
As it stands the movie is just hours of guys in rooms telling us that bombs are bad. There’s no captivating debate here, there’s no tension. I don’t care about Oppenheimer’s security clearance. I don’t care about Strauss’s cabinet confirmation.
on point
- Jul 21, 2023Niggamortis
WE WON???
