Maybe if you know movies

everythin was deserved only lily was robbed tbh

oh damn this was a stinger

Oppenheimer had no competition from a pure objective angle.

the second best movie was very distant...

Lily arguably should've been nominated for supporting

objective lmao

Or history nerd

i got what you sayin but her role was wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too impactful for supporting, icl for me its probably top 10 acting performances oat that ive seen so far

And I get what you mean but she's laying in bed off screen for a lot of the movie

honestly one of the best oscars telecasts in a while. actually entertaining to watch.

think we jus disagree then i guess, i still enjoyed emma stone perfomrnace jus think lilys role is a tier above it, and also a somewhat more challenging role to play.

facts

It's a miraculous movie just in terms of how radical and innovative a film it is. It genuinely puts hollywoods filmmakers to shame.

lol

not even top 25 performances from scorsese films

Lily did great and I thought she would win. She's also not in a lot of the movie. The movie was rewritten to put their relationship front and center, but it leans a lot more DiCaprio. They could've told the story from the family's perspective if you wanted more.

Here's an Osage person saying that:
hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/killers-of-the-flower-moon-osage-consultant-mixed-feelings-1235620231

Emma Stone is a producer on Poor Things. Its her vehicle. That's a lead.

i cant even call it category confusion cause she was billed alongside Leo and De Niro as a lead of the movie... if not her, who U think was leading.. Leo?

in a way carries the movie for me.

Emma Stone absolutely deserved it. I wish it won Best Picture as well. The other movies weren't on it's level.

They did a good job with the winners except Best Picture and Score (which is Poor Things). The score of Poor Things is insane.

If you want her to be the lead then have the movie follow her journey to DC or w/e. That's her courageous feat and it happens off screen. We get a single two minute scene where she talks to the president.

Great performance. Important character. The film itself sets her aside.

fair take bro ski

Quite the opposite imo. Dude quoted me talking about nuance but the only nuance was in rdj’s performance. Oppenheimer wasn’t this hugely complex nuanced character in the film. Pretty standard story of a dedicated science dude who was a s*** husband.

maybe kimmels time to host is up, get someone new or just abandon the host format altogether

Even before this, I thought he was an unlikable a******. Dude’s too full of himself. Dope was mid af too.

He’s admitting he’s a sore loser tho. That’s nice.