I’d be pretty happy if they removed that intro completely it’s so long and unnecessary leave that kind of s*** on Donda
It must sit well with drake
Not gonna make no jokes there but at least r Kelly not making the money
Why not use that part then cause r Kelly gets paid ? Like was it worth the sample ?
He doesn't get paid. Actually the women he abused get paid from his music royalties these days because he has to pay them what they were awarded in the court case
Not gonna make no jokes there but at least r Kelly not making the money
Is there any money that compares with the clout of having a writing credit on a Drake album in 2021
Why not use that part then cause r Kelly gets paid ? Like was it worth the sample ?
Let me add some more context to 40s statement because people need to know. I believe in 2019, Sony froze all of Kelly’s accounts & because he’s being sued, his royalties are being claimed by the landlord of a studio & the people he victimized therefore he effectively gets no cut.
As per Billboard:
His existing recordings still generate plenty of revenue that flows to former label RCA Records — about $1.7 million in the United States so far this year, Billboard estimates — but the resulting royalties don’t go into Kelly’s pockets. That’s because the money has been claimed by both his former recording studio landlord and a woman who won a $4 million judgment against him for allegedly sexually abusing her when she was 16
OP - can you please put this in the original post just so this narrative can stop. Thanks!
Let me add some more context to 40s statement because people need to know. I believe in 2019, Sony froze all of Kelly’s accounts & because he’s being sued, his royalties are being claimed by the landlord of a studio & the people he victimized therefore he effectively gets no cut.
As per Billboard:
His existing recordings still generate plenty of revenue that flows to former label RCA Records — about $1.7 million in the United States so far this year, Billboard estimates — but the resulting royalties don’t go into Kelly’s pockets. That’s because the money has been claimed by both his former recording studio landlord and a woman who won a $4 million judgment against him for allegedly sexually abusing her when she was 16
OP - can you please put this in the original post just so this narrative can stop. Thanks!
bet. We on it
I think the situation is way more nuanced than niggas (and the reporters) want to make it seem.
But the easiest thing would be to remove it, even tho from what it looks like, any money R.Kelly makes isn't gonna go to him anyway.
He doesn't get paid. Actually the women he abused get paid from his music royalties these days because he has to pay them what they were awarded in the court case
Hope so even though optics messy
In case yall were wondering
& more context from @Campari on Kelly's royalties
"Let me some more context to 40s statement because people need to know. I believe in 2019, Sony froze all of Kelly’s accounts & because he’s being sued, his royalties are being claimed by the landlord of a studio & the people he victimized therefore he effectively gets no cut.
As per Billboard:
His existing recordings still generate plenty of revenue that flows to former label RCA Records — about $1.7 million in the United States so far this year, Billboard estimates — but the resulting royalties don’t go into Kelly’s pockets. That’s because the money has been claimed by both his former recording studio landlord and a woman who won a $4 million judgment against him for allegedly sexually abusing her when she was 16"
He right,
They'll eventually update the track, this is just a little detail
Imagine hating on that intro
They don't understand the Lone Star state bro. The intro is goated. Don't know s*** about Prairie View and Wiley and Texas Southern
Also shout out to 40 and the person he talking to. Both being mature about it (they replied to his comment)
Is there any money that compares with the clout of having a writing credit on a Drake album in 2021
I think the situation is way more nuanced than niggas (and the reporters) want to make it seem.
But the easiest thing would be to remove it, even tho from what it looks like, any money R.Kelly makes isn't gonna go to him anyway.
In short
They don't understand the Lone Star state bro. The intro is goated. Don't know s*** about Prairie View and Wiley and Texas Southern
Yup man I was offended cause I went to PV for two years
damn they removed the outro of Love all/lotta 42 but couldnt remove the intro of tsu/not around... it definitely adds to the song but idk if it was worth it
In case yall were wondering
& more context from @Campari on Kelly's royalties
"Let me some more context to 40s statement because people need to know. I believe in 2019, Sony froze all of Kelly’s accounts & because he’s being sued, his royalties are being claimed by the landlord of a studio & the people he victimized therefore he effectively gets no cut.
As per Billboard:
His existing recordings still generate plenty of revenue that flows to former label RCA Records — about $1.7 million in the United States so far this year, Billboard estimates — but the resulting royalties don’t go into Kelly’s pockets. That’s because the money has been claimed by both his former recording studio landlord and a woman who won a $4 million judgment against him for allegedly sexually abusing her when she was 16"
King
they f***ed that song with that slow ass boring intro and now this s*** like cmon
Was on the OG too. I think it fits perfect on the album
In case yall were wondering
& more context from @Campari on Kelly's royalties
"Let me some more context to 40s statement because people need to know. I believe in 2019, Sony froze all of Kelly’s accounts & because he’s being sued, his royalties are being claimed by the landlord of a studio & the people he victimized therefore he effectively gets no cut.
As per Billboard:
His existing recordings still generate plenty of revenue that flows to former label RCA Records — about $1.7 million in the United States so far this year, Billboard estimates — but the resulting royalties don’t go into Kelly’s pockets. That’s because the money has been claimed by both his former recording studio landlord and a woman who won a $4 million judgment against him for allegedly sexually abusing her when she was 16"
i would not question 40 an his music knowledge he knows his s*** good for him for posting this though
Was on the OG too. I think it fits perfect on the album
the one i listened to had nsync