“AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. The study tested whether the vaccine's mRNA could be converted to DNA, and found that this was the case in certain lab-altered liver cell lines under experimental conditions. It did not assess whether the vaccine alters the human genome, or what the effects of that would be, according to experts and the study authors. Experts say additional research is needed because the findings in the lab setting cannot be used to make inferences about what might happen in a human body”
@safe @sab
OP doing nasty clickbait
Abstract
Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
This literally isn’t clickbait
Abstract
Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
This literally isn’t clickbait
Now tell me what in your title indicates the conclusion that this study came to?
F*** off m8
Abstract
Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
This literally isn’t clickbait
How many of us have the knowledge to understand this medical study tho
How many of us have the knowledge to understand this medical study tho
me :)
Now tell me what in your title indicates the conclusion that this study came to?
F*** off m8
This is the title of the article:
Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
?????????
How many of us have the knowledge to understand this medical study tho
There’s a 25 minute YouTube video breaking it down
That video is 25 minutes longs and the thread been up for less than 8 minutes
I meant tbf you really expecting people to watch a 25 min video when you already have that title
They tryna get OP packed up
#PackWatch
I meant tbf you really expecting people to watch a 25 min video when you already have that title
Honestly yeah
This is popular science type s***
“AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. The study tested whether the vaccine's mRNA could be converted to DNA, and found that this was the case in certain lab-altered liver cell lines under experimental conditions. It did not assess whether the vaccine alters the human genome, or what the effects of that would be, according to experts and the study authors. Experts say additional research is needed because the findings in the lab setting cannot be used to make inferences about what might happen in a human body”
You got this from the youtube comments the actual ap article says this:
“The results have in many cases been misinterpreted,” the Q&A also stated.
The study, conducted by researchers at Lund University in Sweden and published in a peer-reviewed journal, investigated the effect of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine on a human cell line that was derived from liver cancer tissue. The experiment was conducted in a petri dish and aimed to answer the question of whether the mRNA in the vaccine could be converted to DNA.
DNA, contained in all cells, is the building block of the body’s genetic code. RNA is closely related to DNA, and one type, called messenger RNA or mRNA, sends instructions to the cell for different purposes. The mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines helps train the body to recognize a protein from the coronavirus to trigger an immune response.
During the study, the researchers were able to detect DNA that had been converted from the vaccine’s mRNA in the lab-modified cell.
Some viruses, like HIV, are known to be able to convert RNA to DNA and then incorporate that DNA into host cells’ genome, which is one thing that makes the illness difficult to treat. Coronaviruses, however, are not expected to do this, said Bethany Moore, chair of the University of Michigan’s Department of Microbiology and Immunology.
apnews.com/article/Fact-Check-COVID-Vaccine-Sweden-Study-986569377766
Honestly yeah
This is popular science type s***
I wouldn’t expect people on here to watch a 30 second video let alone click on an article especially with topics like this one where you’re not really attracting people interested in science, people just wanna know if they’re safe
“Knowing that it is theoretically possible for RNA from a virus or RNA from a vaccine to be incorporated into a cell line in a test tube is very, very different from knowing whether that cell would then survive the body’s immune system and if it did survive the body’s immune system, would make any difference,”
im still questioning him
lmaoo
I wouldn’t expect people on here to watch a 30 second video let alone click on an article especially with topics like this one where you’re not really attracting people interested in science, people just wanna know if they’re safe
That’s sad
This is really interesting stuff that’ll impact the next generation of medicine
Like that video and article is wild informative