It begs a larger question.
Why don't authoritarian-minded leftists simply practice what they preach in their theory?
The words of liberation from the bourgeoise.
Why is it all empty aesthetics, leading to similar oppression under capitalism just under a red flag?
How do you have the right to speak of liberation, when you try to excuse atrocities?
Him being a victim of western imperialism does not excuse this type of rhetoric, in fact, it makes him look like the Turk nationalists that screech whenever you bring up the Armenian genocide.
youre right and they are coping
oppression with a red flag is still oppression
I mean Zimbabwe is a liberal democracy in the same way North Korea is a democratic peoples republic
I obviously mean liberal democracy in practice not just in name
Lol iran has all that Jazz too but is a one party dictatorship run by one individual.
Lol iran has all that Jazz too but is a one party dictatorship run by one individual.
just cause zanu pf are popular doesnt mean zimbabwe isnt a liberal rights respecting democracy, that is absolutely absurd
Synopsis, I honestly like you, but if you want to kick off with the ad-homs, you're regarded as a lolcow on this site for a reason.
Synopsis, I honestly like you, but if you want to kick off with the ad-homs, you're regarded as a lolcow on this site for a reason.
As if what a bunch of weirdos on this site think matters lol. It's pretty simple, if your going to talk on a topic, at least be educated on it
@Synopsis "WELL AKSHULLY CHINA HAS BILLIONAIRES SO THEY CAN FINALLY BECOME THE DOMINANT SUPERPOWER AND BRING FULL COMMUNISM" 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
@Synopsis "WELL AKSHULLY CHINA HAS BILLIONAIRES SO THEY CAN FINALLY BECOME THE DOMINANT SUPERPOWER AND BRING FULL COMMUNISM" 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
Yup because the word china is in any of my posts
Yup because the word china is in any of my posts
I was f***ing with you there but can you actually respond to my posts without just saying "lol "?
Or will you go off to fight a bear in the woods?
I was f***ing with you there but can you actually respond to my posts without just saying "lol "?
Or will you go off to fight a bear in the woods?
Theres nothing to reply to. Yoi use a bunch of words with seemingly no regard for what they mean and clearly no investigation into the structures actually present in those societies while for some reason denying that clearly socialist states do not follow marxist leninism
You literally have no clue what the f*** you're talking about
i don’t get ur intentions. u make the thread sound like it has nothin to discuss n that the op sez nothin, then the op sez somethin and now ur the one whos discussin nothing cus u just say “no” in various forms
so why keep the convo goin at all? you clearly can’t think that the insults will affect his opinion, so what is the goal
i don’t get ur intentions. u make the thread sound like it has nothin to discuss n that the op sez nothin, then the op sez somethin and now ur the one whos discussin nothing cus u just say “no” in various forms
so why keep the convo goin at all? you clearly can’t think that the insults will affect his opinion, so what is the goal
Idc about his opinion I just want him to know hes borderline clueless
Why did every Marxist-Leninist state collapse into market socialism (Vietnam, Yugoslavia, etc.) or authoritarian dictatorships? (The second one is mostly due to CIA intervention in DemSoc countries.)
I know you claim to be a commie and all that, but how can you defend these states knowing they never reached the goal?
Please respond to this with actual writing instead of "lol breadtube toe-sucker that probably masturbates to vaush/destiny clips all day"
Idc about his opinion I just want him to know hes borderline clueless
but u do it through emotional language, only someone who’s extremely affected by emotional language from an online acquaintance would be convinced of what you say you’d want them to know.
i jus don’t get the purpose of that kinda goal unless you want them to also learn something from the interaction that betters em, in which case it’d be better to jus explain why they’re wrong instead of insult em
and if u don’t want them to learn something and just want to insult them, then why do u think anyone would take that srsly beyond the rudeness
i don’t get ur intentions. u make the thread sound like it has nothin to discuss n that the op sez nothin, then the op sez somethin and now ur the one whos discussin nothing cus u just say “no” in various forms
so why keep the convo goin at all? you clearly can’t think that the insults will affect his opinion, so what is the goal
@Synopsis likes posting brainless replies
but u do it through emotional language, only someone who’s extremely affected by emotional language from an online acquaintance would be convinced of what you say you’d want them to know.
i jus don’t get the purpose of that kinda goal unless you want them to also learn something from the interaction that betters em, in which case it’d be better to jus explain why they’re wrong instead of insult em
and if u don’t want them to learn something and just want to insult them, then why do u think anyone would take that srsly beyond the rudeness
Yeah, that's what i want, I want him to explain how I'm wrong in his eyes so I can learn from him (I know he likes to read books), and I learn a lot through talking to people to get their perspective, and arguments are fun.
It's a disgrace to see "Marxists" d***ride massive failures, and do some type of horizontal worship of dead men, instead of looking on how to improve their thinking for the future, and the modern world.
U a marxist ornwhat
U a marxist ornwhat
I sympathize with it a lot, but I disagree with Lenin/Stalin's interpretations of it, there was some success with it but it ultimately failed to reach any of its big goals. I also disagree heavily with the authoritarian aspect and the centralization of the state.
The issue is I have with Marxist-Leninists is that they tend to proclaim the monopoly on the concept of Marxism, when I don't think it's that great to do that. (I know I am speaking to you)
just cause zanu pf are popular doesnt mean zimbabwe isnt a liberal rights respecting democracy, that is absolutely absurd
Maybe now that mugabe is dead the economy in zimbabwe gets a boost. Their 💸 value was worse than iran at one point. The leaders were much alike; they liked to share the cake between their crew and didnt care much about growing it. They live long lives too Mugabe died at 95! Khamenei is only 82 f***in imagine another 13 years, there be no cake left.. 😞
Maybe now that mugabe is dead the economy in zimbabwe gets a boost. Their 💸 value was worse than iran at one point. The leaders were much alike; they liked to share the cake between their crew and didnt care much about growing it. They live long lives too Mugabe died at 95! Khamenei is only 82 f***in imagine another 13 years, there be no cake left.. 😞
has mnangagwa done anything? i remember 3 years ago when mugabe died we were all expecting emmerson to just be another mugabe, but i haven't seen any news lately.
i don't have that much faith myself, especially since emmerson was directly involved in f***ing their economy up in the first place. i figured he'd do some things to make another coup unlikely though.
@Synopsis "WELL AKSHULLY CHINA HAS BILLIONAIRES SO THEY CAN FINALLY BECOME THE DOMINANT SUPERPOWER AND BRING FULL COMMUNISM" 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
You said you don’t like Maoists but they address most of your critiques of ML