ok, you oppose arming nazis. i think it's a reasonable position, i'm also not a big fan of giving weapons to Ukraine right now.
do you support the idea that Russia should destroy the actual Ukraine state/government because of its links with nazis ?
I oppose both Russia and Ukraine on the basis of being capitalist states. My sympathy is with the people of this country. But arming Nazis, which the West is doing as we speak, will produce a blowback similar to arming the Mujahadeen, which laid the groundwork for Al Qaida and ISIS later on.
he wasnt tho? now hes being respectfull
posting things in caps and then being saying BOZOOO is the mood for a ye thread not something like this its not even productive to disucussion
go s***post somewhere else if u want
cry abt it?
if u cant keep up dont even try
it's some pretty dam serious discussion in here even if sometimes its cloaked in sarcasm. But if you couldn't already tell, ur lost
F***ing cope. The EU is in an economic crisis that will be increased by losing out on Russian gas without adequate replacements in place yet. This is delusional. Only the USA benefitted from this.
Germany just said they will spent 100 billion euros on weapons. All money that will miss for schools hospitals roads infrastructure. All money that will go to US arms companies.
This was the US plan all along. Like a mafiosi breaking a window of a store and then telling the owner later they can offer protection if the owner pays up.
cry abt it?
if u cant keep up dont even try
it's some pretty dam serious discussion in here even if sometimes its cloaked in sarcasm. But if you couldn't already tell, ur lost
ur the one responding to things 5 pages ago keep up lmao
i dont think sarcasm has a place in such a divided issue because clearly theres a lot of tactful things to talk about which youre unable to talk about in a serious way
you seem to assume that everyone has the exact same mindset and ideas as you which isnt the case
PUTIN I KNOW YOU GOT SHOOTERS PLEASE DONT SEND EM AT MY HEAD
This ish got my bradas paranoid like Ye at his worst
And for good reason too
why are y'all even so mad at me
we're literally all agreeing in here y'all are just mean
We must let Ukraine join the EU and NATO and station our nuclear warheads in Kyiv immediately, it is our moral duty to fight this never before seen violation of an independent country's sovereignty. The international community is more united than it has ever been.

It absolutely was lmao, they already wanted Ukraine to join NATO in 2008
And bro NATO membership was HIGHLY unpopular in Ukraine until they got sucked into a proxy-war with Russia after the coup in 2014

hmm i wonder how much this has to do with the very pro-russia presidents who fraudulently schemed their way into office before 2014?
you forget, the US is far from the first or only country to meddle with Ukraine
We must let Ukraine join the EU and NATO and station our nuclear warheads in Kyiv immediately, it is our moral duty to fight this never before seen violation of an independent country's sovereignty. The international community is more united than it has ever been.

it's literally 1984 when someone says Russia shouldn't invade Ukraine
hmm i wonder how much this has to do with the very pro-russia presidents who fraudulently schemed their way into office before 2014?
you forget, the US is far from the first or only country to meddle with Ukraine
Well all other former presidents surely werent pro-Russia and Yanukovich was democratically elected.
It wasn't a pro-Russia or pro-US leader who brainwashed the population or anything, what swayed popular opinion was the conflict with Russia that came after the coup.
it's literally 1984 when someone says Russia shouldn't invade Ukraine
It is 1984 when you're acting like we need to be in a nuclear Mexican standoff with Putin because of the invasion
I oppose both Russia and Ukraine on the basis of being capitalist states. My sympathy is with the people of this country. But arming Nazis, which the West is doing as we speak, will produce a blowback similar to arming the Mujahadeen, which laid the groundwork for Al Qaida and ISIS later on.
yeah this is absolutely true but also the west cant intervene or we all risk just dying
i'd argue theres less risk than that situation though due ot ukraines greater integration with western culture as a whole
and just allowing russia to take land sets an incorrect precedent overall for other at risk states and global stability
yeah this is absolutely true but also the west cant intervene or we all risk just dying
i'd argue theres less risk than that situation though due ot ukraines greater integration with western culture as a whole
and just allowing russia to take land sets an incorrect precedent overall for other at risk states and global stability
That precedent was created by NATO in Kosovo about 20 years ago
That precedent was created by NATO in Kosovo about 20 years ago
i would hope we've grown since then
Well all other former presidents surely werent pro-Russia and Yanukovich was democratically elected.
It wasn't a pro-Russia or pro-US leader who brainwashed the population or anything, what swayed popular opinion was the conflict with Russia that came after the coup.
The People's Movement of Ukraine labeled his (Yanukovich's) election on 10 February 2010 as "an attack by anti-Ukrainian forces on our state" and stated that "all possible legal means should be used to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of anti-state politician Yanukovych and his pro-Moscow retinue".
hmm
We must let Ukraine join the EU and NATO and station our nuclear warheads in Kyiv immediately, it is our moral duty to fight this never before seen violation of an independent country's sovereignty. The international community is more united than it has ever been.

if u think that stationing nukes in kiev is a big difference from keeping them in poland then idk lol
u just like to post misinformation and that gif behind it huh
maybe its the fact that invasions set a bad precedent and civilians are dying? nah must be the importance of f***ing kyiv lmao
The People's Movement of Ukraine labeled his (Yanukovich's) election on 10 February 2010 as "an attack by anti-Ukrainian forces on our state" and stated that "all possible legal means should be used to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of anti-state politician Yanukovych and his pro-Moscow retinue".
hmm
Do they even call the elections illegitimate here? Either way it was never leadership that swayed public opinion
It is 1984 when you're acting like we need to be in a nuclear Mexican standoff with Putin because of the invasion
u the kind of dude that supports going to countries minding thier own business and "liberating them" huh
It is 1984 when you're acting like we need to be in a nuclear Mexican standoff with Putin because of the invasion
🙄
I'm squarely anti-american involvement
aid is cool but we do not need to be up in here like... supporting ukrainians is cool but this is 100% not our fight and Russia and US should def not b in direct conflict
that being said, I haven't seen a single person advocating for nuclear s*** to be set up in Ukraine. NATO is primarily defensive. If Ukraine believes they would feel safer with nukes in the area and they were able to show that placing nukes in the area wouldn't be a terrible idea that maybe, just maybe that would happen. But it wouldn't be because this nebulous "west" is working together to invade Russia and threaten its sovereignty