Calling the movie neutral was said by multiple users. I said the movie isn’t neutral . Even the director said it isn’t . No biopic or documentary is neutral

I’ve asked you to name one . A movie can’t be “ neutral “

It can be grey
It can be not good or evil but it’s not neutral ….

Pattinson not bad by any means he is working with what he has but he isn’t really given the range . Would help if he was a normal human being with his family to balance the chaos for me . He only sees the once all movie and he acts in a way that is completely absurd

Apologizing to his wife solely for the cheating arc . Yet we see him with mistress longer than wife then phoned in moments of calling them like they could only afford the kids and Anna Farris for one day of filming .

He has no normal interactions with humanity and I get that’s part of the commentary on fame and how separated he got from reality but it gets to a point

Brother our issue in this thread started when I mentioned reviews mentioning fabricated details . Then many of you were like “ not that much changed this is neutral” in response to me saying it looks a bit like a hit piece . You didn’t randomly say this is neutral

Yal should physically fight

some of yall uncles pedophiles

Massively meh

Brother I had called it a hot piece before all this. I didn’t even reply to you for a reason because multiple users were saying it was nuanced or neutral and I disagree . I never said “ faded disagrees with me he needs a screenwriting class he doesn’t know what he is talking about . “

Regardless of whether I disagree with you your opinion is your own . I back up why I feel the way I do with more than vibes

I say it’s more complicated than good or bad too while also making clear it’s not nuanced simply because it’s not shown as good or evil or good or bad . It’s not binary topic . Neutral q doesn’t mean the same thing it does to you. A “neutral “ biopic of a living person where when they respond to it in anyway you say “ look your reaction is why I made it” when the movie is filled with lies and his former boss who played a part in the issue

If they made a movie about you and lied about you in it and your former boss who caused the issue was in it

No s*** you’re going to react . Predators was much more critical of him then this shallow movie and he took the punches

It’s based on the article that ended the show . An article in which the author incorrectly sides with her conradt family stating there wasn’t csam on the hard drive . Which there was

I already offered multiple users on this forum including him . They be cowards who don’t be on the gym so they get on. The internet to talk crazy to people

They would defend them because the true crime is sensationalism

never forget

never forget

This was fine. The cast was stellar (Oscar nom for ensemble?) I'm mixed on the visual style of this tho some shots were great, but I wish this style was toned down a bit tbh

I actually wish they explored that parallel a bit more. It was clearly on Oppenheim's mind since we saw the concurrent coverage multiple times

I disagree

At the end of the day this movie did basically nothing to address the ethics of the show's existence, the culture that birthed it, or its general ineffectiveness. Not that anyone should have expected anything different from an A24 production starring the biggest actor currently working

It's good for what it is

They def were feeling themselves. Gets cartoonish as s*** in the third act lol

And I respect you disagree. If you think Hansen wasn’t presented as creepy or looming figure throughout points of this movie through sound , lighting , music , dialogue and others reactions to him . I fully respect your opinion . My opinion isn’t coming from nowhere . I’m not disrespecting or belittling people for feeling differently

I think there are many things to critique of Chris Hansen I mentioned them to you directly in conversation before I saw the movie . I wish the movie addressed those things more than other sensationalized and dramatized moments of his life

This is exactly what I’m saying . I don’t think it addressed these things well enough to call it a great biopic. This was more a decoy story and developed character than Chris Hansen . To me it the show . Didn’t address corrupted justice which went opposite to perverted justice . The audience that craves it as much besides his interactions with fans. The real victims . Cycles of abuse. The court cases and repeat offenders . It focuses on the most sensationalized parts of the show . Then adds dramatization on top of a show that was already sensationalized and asserts this is a crazy media cycle we engage in while also engaging in it. Just because it’s art doesn’t change that

Zero dark thirty was dramatization but it’s still Islamophobia same as Argo . Something can still possess the similiar cons of what it’s critiquing or examining and for me this amplifies them

At times felt like they thought they were Refn

Fam these boof ass niggas have been arguing itt for 10 straight pages

Good gracious

You got people saying “ decoy dan never really did a catch “

I thought that s*** would be a dream sequence

There are so many things that never happened in this movie and many will never care to know the truth and that in itself is sad