not everyone, but most
do you think its inherent or because the conditions we live in make it too unforgiving to do anything we want to if it doesn't have a profit motive>
what motive do they have to spend hundreds of man-hours on projects that aren't even physically tangible
whatever motive that is surely can be applied to real life
because studying and work is the same as building pixelblocks for enjoyment and aesthetical pleasure
do you think almond milk wouldve existed under socialism?
it's these kinds of innovations that only happen under capitalism man
we dont need almond milk
do you think its inherent or because the conditions we live in make it too unforgiving to do anything we want to if it doesn't have a profit motive>
what
because studying and work is the same as building pixelblocks for enjoyment and aesthetical pleasure
what are you exactly arguing here? that people don't study and work under socialistic modes of production?
what are you exactly arguing here? that people don't study and work under socialistic modes of production?
Why would someone go the extra mile if there are no reward
what
do you think most people do things for profit motive because they inherently prefer to, or because they have to because of the conditions set by a mainly capitalist society
Why would someone go the extra mile if there are no reward
I don't think you understand what you're arguing against lmao
Orwell was an anti-communist
hope this helps
He was anti-soviet union.
But really not the point I'm making. Dude is trying to prove some anti-socialist point by bringing up George Orwell who was 100% a democratic socialist by his own admission, just proving how ridiculous right wingers are and how lacking they are in any sort of educational history.
I don't think you understand what you're arguing against lmao
im just a dumb uniformed ignorant capitalist right
Socialism is a mode of production that has been proven to be able to reproduce it's forces of production, there is no argument here
do you think most people do things for profit motive because they inherently prefer to, or because they have to because of the conditions set by a mainly capitalist society
Does it matter why? Are u arguing motives would change under socialism?
I believe there would be no drive in people in a socialist structure.
Socialism is a mode of production that has been proven to be able to reproduce it's forces of production, there is no argument here
0 innovation
Does it matter why? Are u arguing motives would change under socialism?
I believe there would be no drive in people in a socialist structure.
What you believe is irrelevant. Where are the facts to back up your claim?
What you believe is irrelevant. Where are the facts to back up your claim?
People are greedy today, want me to interview a rich guy to tell you that he describes himself as greedy? Is that proof?
Greedy people exist. Their motive is money.
Do you understand the conditions of Russia or China in a pre-socialist mode?
They innovated and modernized at an insane speed so your argument is dead in the water here
People are greedy today, want me to interview a rich guy to tell you that he describes himself as greedy? Is that proof?
Greedy people exist. Their motive is money.
So are people greedy because it's an inherent part of human nature, or are they greedy because its what the system demands and people are adaptive to their situation?
So are people greedy because it's an inherent part of human nature, or are they greedy because its what the system demands and people are adaptive to their situation?
is there an answer to that question? does it need an answer?
People are greedy today because there are opportunities in the capitalist system. You want to shut that down with socialism?
There you go. You cant get more money boy, so they start SLACKIN.
is there an answer to that question? does it need an answer?
People are greedy today because there are opportunities in the capitalist system. You want to shut that down with socialism?
There you go. You cant get more money boy, so they start SLACKIN.
So if theres no innovation under a socialist system why did we have a 40 year old cold war?
So if theres no innovation under a socialist system why did we have a 40 year old cold war?
force