The meme was about race. Pick a better one next time.

they made a mistake not executing you, dirty kaffir. wish I could spit on you, keep the Imams name out of your filthy atheist mouth.

yea you got the white mans d*** so far up your ass

Elf on a Shelf

Hidden Imam in my palm

Shambles

Logic of a pious believer Ladies and Gentlemen

@Frankito_Reynolds boo

okay sorry @Frankito_Reynolds this is far more accurate to what you espouse when you jump into every thread

just wanted to bring the thread back on topic but you do understand why third world social democracy doesnt work right?

the forces of capital and neoliberalism demanding austerity and private markets to reproduce structures of exploitation, the US and US aligned imperialist forces destroying any possibility of economic independence through violence when soft power is insufficient, etc

Better but not really.

Iran before the islamic revolution was largely the same poverty wise. mullahs were part of the qajar dynasty and sold out the country to the west back then too.

There was a 20 year period with ok education available and people could dress and pray to whatever they wanted so the pictures come from that era, but power got to the dictators head, didnt allow other parties doubled down with the police state f***ed it up and handed it over to nutcases who are taking it back to their Qajar glory days lol.

I never once in my life suuported monarchists. Yet you choose to use that against me cause that's all you know. You guys love stereotyping

based on his other posts across here and life sxn it unironically seems like he thinks the way the west should atone for its sins of imperialism is instead of getting tf out is actually colonize all those countries even harder but allow them to elect their own regional cultural officials, as a treat of course. but not if they support islam or anything anti-secular or anti-western of course either. so the west is bad and the west ruined the region, but they should also mimick the west more and be fixed by the west in atonement.
so then social democracy will work because all of the countries will be homogenized enough but it wont be imperialism anymore or something. because what matters isnt the actual sincerity cultural identity or the independence or self-determination, it's the semantics of freedom, and the schrodinger's cat of independence. they should all just exist in a vacuum of mimicking western social democracy models but also take the post-capitalist cultural standards of the west but also allow the native cultural aspecs to exist or something. but not if they impede on the western cultural standards, of course, but at the same time the west is still bad even though everything should be modeled on the west.

That's not even remotely close to what i believe. I think the west should f*** off all together.

no one knows what you believe because you are the most inconsistent poster on this entire website and even when you say what you believe you functionally nullify it like less than 2 pages later

I think im pretty consistent

You guys can't fathom the fact that someone can be against both evils lol

i get that ur liberal socdem stance directly opposes krishnas baathism but seriously u understand why capitalist encirclement will never allow a blossoming third world social democracy that isn't just third world impoverishing plus treats right?

I know they wont allow it. Yet i'm gonna speak on what i experience and see. Shouldn't I?

he argues in bad faith but this post is weird too

been lurking the thread these past 15 or so pages,pure entertainment

No one has a problem if you want to believe in what you do. Most people on this site have an issue with you because you jump into threads that are meant to be essentially containment threads for certain topics to inject inflammatory and often insulting statements for virtually no reason and then when people try to challenge you on it you just spout nonsense or lead people into longwinded arguments where you basically spout semantics instead of engaging with any form of debate or ideological grounds even when proved wrong or called out. There are lots of posters on this site with radically different beliefs and no one has any issue with them, the difference between them is they don't actively seek out arguments and inflaming others for no reason.

yea thats what im trying to find out is what ur position is, and where i can help direct you towards resources that might help to explain why certain approaches are materially impossible.

Look who is talking about long-winded arguments

But yeah sometimes i'm just pulling legs. Sorry khalqi.

Honestly I don't know. My position is to try and see things for what they really are as much as i can.