He said let's put an end to this argument like a KTT thread is the answer to 100s of years of debate
OP to answer your question, a majority of Americans are fine with what you’re proposing. There are just weirdos on the left who think private business should be abolished and weirdos on the right (who actually have power and influence) that think the government should just enforce laws and discriminate
US doesn't have free-for-all capitalism without safety nets. Every time the system fails the government intervenes. They just intervene on the behalf of business interests, not the public. It's not just market forces.
The "social democracy" you're describing is just the new deal democrat form of capitalism mainly defined by big social programs and a strong presence of organized labor. The system that actually led to what we have now.
Modern Capitalism is Socialism for Coporations and the Rich
He said let's put an end to this argument like a KTT thread is the answer to 100s of years of debate
and like capitalism and socialism are static definitions
Social democracy easily
Anyone who says social democracy isnt attainable in every country is lying to you
Anyone who says social democracy doesn’t do enough to fix the problem with society is also lying to you
Anyone who says social democracy doesn’t do enough to fix the problem with society is also lying to you
??
??
I mean it’s not perfect, but it’s closer to perfect than what a lot of other guys are throwing out there
Let’s put an end to this argument once for all
Would yall support a system that has limits on private enterprise and guarantees every citizen a certain quality of life (think social democracy but slightly stronger) as
opposed to a free for all capitalist state with little to no safety nets, not unlike what u find in the US
Discuss
so not socialism lol. notice how yall dont even want socialism 🤣🤣
Also im done with these f***ing threads
yall wearing a man out with these stagnant capitalism vs socialism threads :(
same old arguments
agree with you for once.
no one is going to change their opinion. i would rather just talk about specific issues or political news
Social democracy easily
Anyone who says social democracy isnt attainable in every country is lying to you
its not attainable in every country.
you can't even accurately describe socialism in your OP lmao, so misleading title
US doesn't have free-for-all capitalism without safety nets. Every time the system fails the government intervenes. They just intervene on the behalf of business interests, not the public. It's not just market forces.
The "social democracy" you're describing is just the new deal democrat form of capitalism mainly defined by big social programs and a strong presence of organized labor. The system that actually led to what we have now.
"system failing" is debatable.
govt bailing out failing companies isnt the system imo
For better or worse there isn’t a country as advanced as the US.
I wonder why ...
See this is the s*** that makes me not even want to engage in threads like these 
Motherfuckers have no idea what economic imperialism is 
Or how slavery allowed 300 years of unpaid wages build the U.S.
Maybe that's why they're the most advanced coutnry - bc they looted from every country in the global south
I am tired of explaining basic ass concepts to ppl
Last post n thats it
lots of countries had slavery longer than the usa. lots of countries looted longer than the usa to....
More expensive? You mean like inflation and relative wages? Well that's specific to their economy. The US never had the nordic model. Sweden specifically has been subject to some neoliberal reforms over the years, their housing specifically. David Harvey refers to as a "circumscribed neoliberalism". New Deal Democracy was the closest the US came to any of that.
I said expansive but i take yr point
I think when people have their material needs met the drive for innovation would be easier to act on, and it would target betterment of the collective society and quality of life and all that so
"system failing" is debatable.
govt bailing out failing companies isnt the system imo
Boom and bust, the business cycle, is inherent to capitalism. Classical economics had no answers for that. Keynesian economics was developed to regulate the economy to minimize those downturns. Neoliberal economics contends that regulation is what causes them in the first place. Regardless, the state has to intervene in some fashion or people end up out of work and starving in the streets.
The system is literally designed to fail over and over.
Have you travelled outside of the US, OP? I don't think any civil engineer or economist would agree with what you said there about our cities
For What i value personally as a 20 year old black guy US cities are unmatched in the world save 1 or 2 exceptions
Im sure khak urban planners would cream about some 99% white city in denmark where poc don’t get into clubs or some “vintage” italian city that’s even more racist but with the added benefit of only being able to make $18,000/yr as a college grad....
But to me i value a city like nyc or an atl wayy more. Atl is basically a black metropolis, u got boujie black people, black people in entertainment, black hipsters everything
And yea ive been outside north america
Boom and bust, the business cycle, is inherent to capitalism. Classical economics had no answers for that. Keynesian economics was developed to regulate the economy to minimize those downturns. Neoliberal economics contends that regulation is what causes them in the first place. Regardless, the state has to intervene in some fashion or people end up out of work and starving in the streets.
The system is literally designed to fail over and over.
not necessarily but i know what you mean.