Metacritic PC has it at a 90 with 27ish reviews. OpenCritic got more reviews and it dropped. They have diff weighting systems but that 7 from IGN is an anchor cuz of Metacritic's stupid ass weighting system. Edge will be Edge, too

fallout 4 was a great game lmao only people who hated it are fallout purists who didn’t want any changes to the formula

It’s not as good as the other fallout games but it was still pretty good. They improved companions, combat, enemy design, weapon modding, the perk system, etc. and far harbor is one of their best dlcs period

bethesda fallout so awful man

elder scrolls always a good time

hope this more elder scrolls less (bethesda) fallout

Reviews saying this is closest to oblivion in rpg elements

she play with my star till i filed

80-90 is borderline guaranteed for a AAA first party game these days tbf. Just surprised, I thought Todd Howard for sure would deliver that elusive 90+

we're so back...

Destructoid

No one cares about any ign but the main one keep coping though

“90 on metacritic!!! It’s over!! FLOP!!”

Meanwhile new Vegas has a 84

And New Vegas stinks. What you trying to say?

deathloop won awards and I didn't get it. It be like that not everything will click

This is the most ignorant ass American thing I’ve ever read

The United States is not the center of the universe

?

You coping brah WE WANTED THE 90+ AND YOU KNOW IT. Game gonna be fire regardless of scores

It got a 90!!!

Fallout 4 greatly improved their combat, but was chock full of weak side quests, a bad main story (just straight up bad) and greatly reduced, simplified RPG elements.

And it directly following up Fallout: New Vegas really highlighted its shortcomings in all those departments.

I’m not American though lmaooo

Just speaking facts

For 3 minutes

?

meta critic is at 87

thats even sadder