Arkane really got a game that reviewed higher than a Todd Howard game bruh...
arkane used to be pretty good prior to deathloop & redfall
bethesda fallout so awful man
elder scrolls always a good time
hope this more elder scrolls less (bethesda) fallout
fallout is awful?\
oh i like this guys videos i'm not ready for this
not a spoiler but most problems he encountered came later in the game he said
Been reading Genes review
Got me excited
Yeah buddy Gene always really takes his time with his reviews
I’ve just been informed this is a classic we will all be playing for the next 10 years
What good is exploring 1000 planets if they all mostly empty
Immersion
Nothing like logging onto Starfield after a bad day at work and wandering around aimlessly on empty planets for a 2 hour session so you can advance the quest storyline.
many of the reviews knocking for barren planets like they havent repeated that a million times telling the public that
anyone notice when sea of stars got an 88 on meta crimson ark made a thread “looks like we got ANOTHER banger this year” but when starfield gets 88 on meta he’s in here trashing the game as not being innovative
Spiderman 2 will get an 88 Meta too btw
I think 90 or higher if it really pushes it even if its more spider man s*** flows
anyone notice when sea of stars got an 88 on meta crimson ark made a thread “looks like we got ANOTHER banger this year” but when starfield gets 88 on meta he’s in here trashing the game as not being innovative
Makes you think
fallout is awful?\
Fallout as directed by Todd Howard's Bethesda game studios starting with fallout 3 (2008) followed by fallout 4 (2015) are awful
Only fallout I’ve played is 4 and I’m sorry but that game was ass
Fallout 3 and New Vegas are fire
Fallout as directed by Todd Howard's Bethesda game studios starting with fallout 3 (2008) followed by fallout 4 (2015) are awful
aight
Only fallout I’ve played is 4 and I’m sorry but that game was ass
I only played 4 and I liked it
anyone notice when sea of stars got an 88 on meta crimson ark made a thread “looks like we got ANOTHER banger this year” but when starfield gets 88 on meta he’s in here trashing the game as not being innovative
Speak on this my guy
anyone notice when sea of stars got an 88 on meta crimson ark made a thread “looks like we got ANOTHER banger this year” but when starfield gets 88 on meta he’s in here trashing the game as not being innovative
@CrimsonArk How do you respond?