Bazooe

3y

explain this to me

capers

3y

There is nothing to digest, this is not high level thinking it’s stupid and he just posted a popular google images search result. First he says the media made a thesis but then he says the government is responsible to address that thesis…but they didn’t make it? Makes no f***ing sense, don’t entertain this bullshit.

WBW

3y

The thesis in terms of covid was pushed by untrustworthy organizations. It’s well documented that the sources the media regurgitated their information and suggestions from all flipflopped on plenty of important ends. Most notably the oxygen tanks used for months that led to an unnecessary amount of deaths. The faces of covid prevention in 2020 were fauci, the WHO, and the CDC. Fauci has clear ties with experimental Chinese labs, vaccines, and clearly has his own agendas. WHO is almost guaranteed to be on Chinas payroll. And the CDC has literally changed their guidelines on their website in regards to covid idk how many times. The term conspiracy theory scares people away from critical thinking. Take a step back and look at the situation from an unbiased viewpoint and see how the facts presented have made sense in the past year and some change. Science and facts don’t care about opinion or political allegiance. The fact of the matter is the people we looked to for guidance all played a reactive role in this pandemic.

capers

3y

What is Fauci’s “clear” agenda? Of course the CDC changed the guidelines as they got more information, that’s how science and medicine work

capers

3y

What is Fauci’s “clear” agenda? Of course the CDC changed the guidelines as they got more information, that’s how science and medicine work

WBW

3y

Fauci’s organization helped fund the wuhan lab and experimentation that originally was sworn not to be the source of the covid variant leak according to the same cdc that later said they’re “likely” to have caused. We can all differ in opinion but it’s pretty ignorant not to admit that most of what we’re told about this situation is almost entirely political

WBW

3y

Someone itt give me one logical reason Kyrie isn’t allowed to play. Keep in mind nba players are already tested daily

capers

3y

His institution? You mean the NIH? Do you even know what the NIH is and what it does? Of course they funded the research, that’s what they are designed to do. I admit this has been politicized, by the wrong side unfortunately.

Goldmenace

3y

S*** is stupid, nigga a young high level pro athlete and they get tested, let the nigga play damn

WBW

3y

I wouldn’t use that as a point against him if he and the institute of infectious disease didn’t lie about their involvement. Why would you as a leader of a national organization say you didn’t fund something you know you funded if you weren’t complicit in the outcome?

Warrior

3y

People act like its the pharmaceutical companies fault for the effectiveness declining

Antibody response for different viruses last different amounts of time. Some memory b cells remain in the body for 40+ years. Sometimes they only last a few months. Obviously more research is gonna be done to try to make it last longer but this isn't because they tryna get you on a booster "subscription" like i see some people say

jg33

3y

regardless of whether or not they're technically effective or not at preventing spread, we've seen rates of hospitalization and death plummet since the vaccines were widely implemented.

At the hospital I work at 95%+ of the hospitalized individuals are people with comorbid conditions who elected to not get vaccinated. Meanwhile, they expect to be treated with remdesivir (an equally new and experimental antiviral)

It's a personal choice of course, but the risk assessment is fairly obvious in my personal opinion.

Lack of effectiveness at preventing spread/infection is easily explained by the delta variant's emergence from (the almost entirely unvaccinated) India.

The outcomes we care about and should have been looking for this whole time are hospitalizations/deaths so as to minimize mortality and the burden on health care providers/ the health care system, and the vaccine rollout has been very clearly correlated with the decrease in those numbers among the vaccinated. We will inevitably have to live with COVID-19's existence, counting cases and this study's operational definition of "effectiveness" should not be the main focus.

Sleazy

3y

i dont get the flu shot and i dont get sick,... also are flu shots being shoved down our throats? do we how to show proof of a flu shot? am I allowed in a building if i dont have my flu shot?

Plus I got vaccinated for diseases in highschool and it was only one shot and never needed a booster and I'm protected for life

Pups

3y

Yup

Pfizer+ crew checking in

frenchpress

3y

(the almost entirely unvaccinated) India

it was the entirely unvaccinated world s*** was discovered at the end of 2020

LegitAlpha

3y

natural immunity crew checking in

math fifty

3y

Nigga what nuts you eating?

Pause

Monkey D Zoro

3y

The pandemic(plandemic) in a nutshell

SlicedBread

3y

What a time we live in and we're alive on Earth to witness it.

Monkey D Zoro

3y

You see it becomes a never ending cycle. New strains, new variants, new "outbreaks", new boosters. The key is knowing the root point, the original people who made the thesis to begin with. Media/politicians/big tech/big pharma.

The synthesis = the solution. Now, who has been making the decisions(offering the solutions) during all of this? Mainstream media/politicians/big tech/big pharma. Do theirs solutions fall in line with the majority of the public? No. If the minority is making decisions for the majority that don't fall in line with the majority(us the general public weather your left right republican democrat liberal conservative black white tan etc) if your decisions don't fall in line with the majority, then 1 must question the motives behind the people offering the solutions to their very own thesis..

But you can't ask real questions about the vax or you get censored. Hmm, vax related to big pharma and censorship done by big tech, we can't ask questions but we have to believe their surface level statements that appear to only be back by "fact checkers"(a rather new and awkward phenomenon since people started to question their agenda).

Whole thing is fishy to say the very least

Synopsis

3y

can you go ahead and elaborate on this post using hegelian synthesis

Monkey D Zoro

3y

I'll explain hegalian synthesis on a base level & then apply it to present time cause you have you understand the base principle of hegelian dialect(synthesis) & then you'll be able to see how it's being applied/used in a negative manner.

Synthesis= the solution to the thesis. But if the thesis is made under false pretenses(the situation were In) then it becomes confusing because the truth becomes cloudy & jotted.

If I ask you for 100 dollars outright because I need it while I'm wearing designer clothes, you'd likely say no. Let's say I take that into consideration and dress bummy purposely and ask you for 2 dollars once a week, chances/odds would be more in favor to possibly be giving said 2bucks since it'd a far less amount & my appearance would match my request. That said, it'd be devious on my end to purposely dress bummy and request money from you knowing I have designer cloths which cost alot of money to acquire. Point is, with me having what in this scenario would be considered a ill intent, without informing or alarming you of the such, you can fall into what would be my trap of giving money to someone who ultimately doesn't need it. And let's say after 50 weeks of getting 2 bucks a week, I reach 100 bucks, I in a deceitful way accomplished my original proposition of wanting 100bucks by deceitfully asking for lower amounts in a form that would justify the request.

This is a extreme example, but point is with ill intent put towards a proposition without context, and you can get lost in the sauce.

Synopsis

3y

I know what hegelian synthesis lmao

im saying how does it apply to covid