Yea I’m sure we’d be able to f*** up overwhelming and compelling evidence

What’s the point in p****footing around if we know 100000% someone is guilty?

In cases like that they should be put down like dogs

I've been reading McPhee's Maximum Harm which lays out the case that the older brother, Tamerlan, was a CIA asset. The book itself is rather shortsighted geopolitically, but the theory has legs.

But they’ll just say they have 10000% overwhelming evidence on someone that they don’t actually have 10000% evidence on and then execute them. What’s so hard to understand my guy? They execute innocent people still

People ITT want someone that blew people to smithereens to live smh

damn 2013 feels like it was yesterday

can't think of the Boston marathon without remembering the bombings, it's a damn shame

f*** this guy

That’s one way to put it