Releasing photos like this will just ruin his rep and he probably won't get booked again.
Doubt it
The photos look good, he will get more exposure. Non celebrity model wouldn’t care about this
Sounds like they should’ve paid the guy.
What kind of f***ed up photo shoot has the photographer paying for the production in the first place
She looks good though. I get why she’s mad and it’s clearly not her fault her team didn’t handle things correctly, but at least the pictures are fire.
Photographer is in the wrong here
The photos are his property but since its still of SZA he needs a release form from her
Photographer is in the wrong here
The photos are his property but since its still of SZA he needs a release form from her
Right but if it’s true that nothing was signed whatsoever, and he funded the whole shoot, I can see why he did it.
But who knows. A release is mandatory but so is a signed contract and payment.
It seems morally wrong on the part of the photographer.
But can someone tell me, who owns the pictures if taken in this forum? Him saying the pictures are "his work" makes me wonder.
its her likeness and he cant abuse that legally especially when he’s promoting his brand. An exception would be if she signed a contract ALLOWING him to use her likeness but even then she may retain the right to withhold them
They didn’t even pay the nigga
Wtf do they expect especially since he put the money up for studio time and equipment
The pics are good too thats prolly why he wanna show em
Punch tweeting like there’s anything to even be done, the pics are on the Internet forever now
um respect a woman’s choice to not have her body posted on the internet without her consent 🤷🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
Doubt it
The photos look good, he will get more exposure. Non celebrity model wouldn’t care about this
He isn't funding a sza photoshoot to go back to shooting non celebs lol. If you followed him you would see.his ambitions and this will follow him
I get the photographers prospective, but I also understand SZA feeling violated by this. Tough situation all around.
They're both in the wrong. The photographer was probably too nice and afraid of losing the opportunity so he let her walk over him and paid for the entire thing while having nothing in writing or signed. Sza clearly didn't put in effort into making sure he got taken care of and probably just told someone on her team to deal with it and never checked up on it. He shouldn't have posted them, she should have put in more effort.
I wonder if any of y’all’s moms or sisters got their photos and posted without consent would yall have the same energy
um respect a woman’s choice to not have her body posted on the internet without her consent 🤷🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
u can’t assume everyone will move with respect in business especially the entertainment business, gotta move better
Though I do think the photos are pretty bad. She looks great but they're incredibly derivative of early-mid 2000's pop star photography to the point where they just look lifeless and emotionless. I'm pretty sure every teen focused magazine in the checkout lines during those years were filled with photos that look just like this. Props to him though if he's getting that bag repackaging something that was mass produced 20 years ago
I wonder if any of y’all’s moms or sisters got their photos and posted without consent would yall have the same energy
why is this stupid argument always brought up lmao
she's not my sister or my mom so I can be objective and dont care
It seems morally wrong on the part of the photographer.
But can someone tell me, who owns the pictures if taken in this forum? Him saying the pictures are "his work" makes me wonder.
no one itt has the answer
a contract decides ownership. apparently nobody signed one
Photographer is within his writes legally and likely thought this would be good publicity. He's socially in the wrong and the publicity isn't good as a result. Not sure what he actually gained from this. Bad move.