Sub to r/COVID-19 (not r/coronavirus) and call it a day.
You’ll get all the updates you’ll need.
Sub to r/COVID-19 (not r/coronavirus) and call it a day.
You’ll get all the updates you’ll need.
What's there ?
Not the doctors... The companies that sell the vaccines. As the doctor in this thread here pointed out theyre individuals and some hold this opinion some that one
Yeah, no s***. Everyone knows pharmaceutical companies are s***, they’re like every other corporate entity.
Thing is though, like pretty all medical procedures, there’s a risk. There are no catch all, risk-free solutions.
The mRNA vaccines absolutely justify their own existence because they’ve time and time and again have proven to be the most effective defense that we have.
Imagine where we’d be at if we had to depend solely on J&J, NOVAVAX etc.
They’re less effective at preventing serious illness (leading to hospitalizations, which means more crowded hospitals) and death, AND infection in the first place.
What's there ?
It collects pretty much all the most recent major studies /reports both peer-reviewed and non.
It collects pretty much all the most recent major studies /reports both peer-reviewed and non.
Appreciate it
Yeah, no s***. Everyone knows pharmaceutical companies are s***, they’re like every other corporate entity.
Thing is though, like pretty all medical procedures, there’s a risk. There are no catch all, risk-free solutions.
The mRNA vaccines absolutely justify their own existence because they’ve time and time and again have proven to be the most effective defense that we have.
Imagine where we’d be at if we had to depend solely on J&J, NOVAVAX etc.
They’re less effective at preventing serious illness (leading to hospitalizations, which means more crowded hospitals) and death, AND infection in the first place.
What's your point? The thing is that normally with medical procedures people can opt out without facing scrutiny. If I forced you to undergo hip surgery even though you didn't want to would you like that
What's your point? The thing is that normally with medical procedures people can opt out without facing scrutiny. If I forced you to undergo hip surgery even though you didn't want to would you like that
Because it’s a heavily politicized position that seldom comes from a place of reason and logic.
Because it’s a heavily politicized position that seldom comes from a place of reason and logic.
Yes I completely agree, and that's why it is hard to discuss reasonably. I repeat I am not anti vax I support all non mRNA vaccines or vaccines that have had time to be tested.
I have rheumatoid arthritis now and it's f***ing me up and that's why I talked to the doctor in the first place
So coronavirii as you know have been around for ages, most likely you have had one in your life pre COVID
Common in younger children most of them cause mild respiratory symptoms
Some much more dangerous variants like mers and Sars have higher fatality rates
Predominantly the immune response against them is t cell based (aka cellular) not antibody (aka humoral)
This is a key point as mRNA vaccines are good at producing antibody responses but not so good at producing cellular ones
Most of the effects of COVID are not due to the virus itself but instead hyperactivation of the immune system similar to something called macrophage activation syndrome
This is why firstly, steroids are an excellent treatment as they settle down short term inflammation
There is a genetic basis to people that suffer more than others
For example East Asian and black people possess genes that can make them more susceptible to severe COVID but also low vitamin d (as vitamin d is an important regulator of immune function) predisposes severe COVID
Hence why in the northern hemisphere dark skinned people who are usually vit d deficient seemed to be hit harder
Faster forward from the catastrophic governmental responses to the outbreak and you have the vaccine developments
It was obvious from the start that mRNA vaccines would be plagued with side effects and whilst fast to make would likely no offer significant long term protection
This is partly because we have seen how mRNAs vaccines work against cancer and how they don't produce adequate t cell responses and how dendritic line driven mRNA vaccines cause autoimmune antibodies to be producing
As previously mentioned
This is also why Pfizer and moderna heavily played up their 99% effectiveness which was based largely on developing antibody responses
Secondly traditional immunity works by recognising multiple antigens presented
So virus comes into the body, first you activate something called the innate immune response
A broad immune mechanism that works by recognising a wide range of similar looking patterns and works to form a response quickly
But not that effectively
Then after time you develop an adaptive response
This is the antibody response and t cell response
These take much longer but are much more effective and give better long term protection
A naked mRNA vaccine is a single antigen
So when it comes in contact with the immune system a very specific response is made to that specific antigen which results in antibodies specific to that and only that
Virus mutates sufficiently which is what viruses do it's ineffective
Also because you aren't mounting a full immune responses t cell recruitment is poor
Contrast this to astrazeneca for example
Where they took mRNA and shoved it inside a modified adenovirus that can't replicate
Means that multiple antigens were presented
Whilst not all Corona specific
It means the body mounted a much more rounded immune response
So t cell responses were often larger than mRNA vaccines
Next the Pfizer idea was that the naked mRNA would neither migrate from the injection site, nor transform into dna
And since then there is ample proof that not only does it migrate but also the mRNA is capable of being translated back into dna which can then increase risks of things like liver cancer
Basically
What was needed was a proper trial
And 10-15 years of phase 4 follow up
What the government's of the west did
Was allow that experimentation to occur without proper informed consent and with an inability to sue the companies of something goes wrong
It's a real crapshot
And we have no idea how it'll turn out for the next 15-20 years
imagine someone reading this s***
Yes I completely agree, and that's why it is hard to discuss reasonably. I repeat I am not anti vax I support all non mRNA vaccines or vaccines that have had time to be tested.
I have rheumatoid arthritis now and it's f***ing me up and that's why I talked to the doctor in the first place
chill i have health anxiety and am double vaxed and boosted now i’m constantly checking my symptoms since i read this thread
chill i have health anxiety and am double vaxed and boosted now i’m constantly checking my symptoms since i read this thread
If you're worried just be real , do you have any symptoms and if yes go to a doc and get your blood checked. That's how I found out that all the markets for rheumatoid arthritis were up
Yes I completely agree, and that's why it is hard to discuss reasonably. I repeat I am not anti vax I support all non mRNA vaccines or vaccines that have had time to be tested.
I have rheumatoid arthritis now and it's f***ing me up and that's why I talked to the doctor in the first place
“That’s why it’s hard to discuss reasonably”
The thread title:
The anti vaxxers were right…
“That’s why it’s hard to discuss reasonably”
The thread title:
The anti vaxxers were right…
CMON man I did that on purpose to get people in here to talk lol
CMON man I did that on purpose to get people in here to talk lol
Clickbait titles a known way to elicit reasonable discussion
Clickbait titles a known way to elicit reasonable discussion
Well now that you say it like THAT
Yeah, no s***. Everyone knows pharmaceutical companies are s***, they’re like every other corporate entity.
Thing is though, like pretty all medical procedures, there’s a risk. There are no catch all, risk-free solutions.
The mRNA vaccines absolutely justify their own existence because they’ve time and time and again have proven to be the most effective defense that we have.
Imagine where we’d be at if we had to depend solely on J&J, NOVAVAX etc.
They’re less effective at preventing serious illness (leading to hospitalizations, which means more crowded hospitals) and death, AND infection in the first place.
novavax is very effective from what i've heard
The vaccine was stupid tbh not because of any potential "long term side effects" theory but because it was barely effective at stopping the spread of the virus
look man all I’m saying is I’ve gotten 4 of them and no heart, lung, brain damage has shown up with all the scans I’ve had done