Reply
  • May 8

    Like cmon lol

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    Reeves: it’s somebody who hasn’t been done before

    People: omg it’s Mr freeze cause there’s snow!

    Boo this man

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    Boo this man

    For not setting false expectations?

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply

    Couldn’t sign into ktt2 for like a week cause of the Google sign in error

    WE BYKE THOUGH CHRISTMAS BATMAN

  • May 8

    Thread having fun . There can still be villains never done before in movie

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    Sgt Leaf

    Couldn’t sign into ktt2 for like a week cause of the Google sign in error

    WE BYKE THOUGH CHRISTMAS BATMAN

    We BACK BROTHER

  • May 8
    ·
    2 replies
    NobodyWins

    For not setting false expectations?

    I mean…there aren’t really expectations as of now. They’re dead silent on story and prob will be until the trailer releases

    At best, we have three new main cast, but even details are slim there beyond rumors and leanings. Let’s say they’re probably the Dents, what does that tell us?

    Freeze being there doesn’t necessarily discount what Reeves said. His comment on villains was vague at best and we’re otherwise relying on rumors and trades.

  • May 8
    YANDHI

    I mean…there aren’t really expectations as of now. They’re dead silent on story and prob will be until the trailer releases

    At best, we have three new main cast, but even details are slim there beyond rumors and leanings. Let’s say they’re probably the Dents, what does that tell us?

    Freeze being there doesn’t necessarily discount what Reeves said. His comment on villains was vague at best and we’re otherwise relying on rumors and trades.

    This is a good post I’m following you brother

  • Fans popular takeaway from Matt’s comment on villains was Hush up until the ScarJo casting months later made folk rethink lol

    We really don’t have any set expectations or direction on where this goes

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    YANDHI

    I mean…there aren’t really expectations as of now. They’re dead silent on story and prob will be until the trailer releases

    At best, we have three new main cast, but even details are slim there beyond rumors and leanings. Let’s say they’re probably the Dents, what does that tell us?

    Freeze being there doesn’t necessarily discount what Reeves said. His comment on villains was vague at best and we’re otherwise relying on rumors and trades.

    I mean I feel he was making it very official when he said it’s someone that hasn’t been done lol. It’s gonna be something like court of owls.

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    I mean I feel he was making it very official when he said it’s someone that hasn’t been done lol. It’s gonna be something like court of owls.

    I don’t see Court personally as a individual villain for Part 2

    I do still lean towards them potentially doing it, but with seeds planted leading up to Part 3.

    I’m just throwing s*** at the wall. I’ve already posted on Phantasm when Reeves first made the comments, Owls, Dents, etc..

    Reeves said “never REALLY been done” it wasn’t clear and he was hesitant mid comment

  • May 8
    YANDHI

    I don’t see Court personally as a individual villain for Part 2

    I do still lean towards them potentially doing it, but with seeds planted leading up to Part 3.

    I’m just throwing s*** at the wall. I’ve already posted on Phantasm when Reeves first made the comments, Owls, Dents, etc..

    Reeves said “never REALLY been done” it wasn’t clear and he was hesitant mid comment

    I just know how people get when what they cast in their head doesn’t turn out to be true and I don’t wanna sit through posts crying it’s not mr freeze when reeves said it’s something new to live action Batman.

  • May 8
    ·
    2 replies

    Mr freeze was a main villain already so unless he means “never been done story wise” but no s*** he’s not gonna retell the story a previous live action movie told.

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply

    Court of owls and conspiracy when that’s similiar to plot of first movie

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    HaroldsChicken

    Court of owls and conspiracy when that’s similiar to plot of first movie

    You can def do court of owls without it being similar to riddler and his live streams lol

  • May 8

    Calendar man would be cool with it being Christmas time.

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    You can def do court of owls without it being similar to riddler and his live streams lol

    The Wayne’s and secret corruption was a major part of first film as well as his parents

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    Mr freeze was a main villain already so unless he means “never been done story wise” but no s*** he’s not gonna retell the story a previous live action movie told.

    This is why it was vague tho lol like we still don't know what he meant 7 months later. And all we've got since are castings believed to be the Dents, which has spurred little to no creative theories or new expectations anyway. In fact it led some people to think this was retreading.

    Like did he mean never been in a live action film, a film at all, a new iteration of a previous villain, etc... At the Emmy's you could see him actively hesitate as he was saying that. "Never......really....been done in a film before.."

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply

    Any idea has to ultimately link to a heavy Bruce Wayne centered story. If its Freeze we wouldn't just get a Batman & Robin repeat. If there's one thing Matt has been firm on, its that this is doubling down on Bruce. Whether its Dents, Freeze, Owls, etc... it has to unfold something about Bruce.

  • May 8
    YANDHI

    Any idea has to ultimately link to a heavy Bruce Wayne centered story. If its Freeze we wouldn't just get a Batman & Robin repeat. If there's one thing Matt has been firm on, its that this is doubling down on Bruce. Whether its Dents, Freeze, Owls, etc... it has to unfold something about Bruce.

    I don’t want robin movie 2 for this reason

  • May 8
    HaroldsChicken

    The Wayne’s and secret corruption was a major part of first film as well as his parents

    So makes sense to continue on that and dig deeper into it…no?

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    YANDHI

    This is why it was vague tho lol like we still don't know what he meant 7 months later. And all we've got since are castings believed to be the Dents, which has spurred little to no creative theories or new expectations anyway. In fact it led some people to think this was retreading.

    Like did he mean never been in a live action film, a film at all, a new iteration of a previous villain, etc... At the Emmy's you could see him actively hesitate as he was saying that. "Never......really....been done in a film before.."

    Idk man just doesn’t feel like it’s mr freeze. What would you even do for him that’s grounded? He couldn’t have his iconic s*** lol. My guess is still court of owls.

  • May 8
    ·
    1 reply
    NobodyWins

    Idk man just doesn’t feel like it’s mr freeze. What would you even do for him that’s grounded? He couldn’t have his iconic s*** lol. My guess is still court of owls.

    I feel like setting is also important too though. They tried to make Riddler come across way more serial killer like to fit Halloween mold for The Batman. If Reeves push continues to be snow pics, including Battinson's reveal, its kinda hard to ignore villain ideas that match. We have no real leads so far beyond suspected castings.

    Even Batman Returns used snow to introduce that iteration of Penguin, who was "cold-blooded" and thrived at low temps.

    As for grounded, I personally don't see Reeves Gotham being as limited as many like to say. A freeze gun can totally be operationalized for the real world, especially in a winter setting imo. It'd be a scientific leap made by a character who's literally a cryogenics expert.

  • HaroldsChicken

    We BACK BROTHER

    Okay brother we byke