Nov 9, 2020·2 replies
SynopsisYeah, they'd still be making a profit off housing
What's bad about that?
- Nov 9, 2020·1 reply
Jowe BuddewIt just sounds like you are trying to argue man.
I'm understanding what he is saying now. Its just about not taking advantage of people at it's root.
Landlords may pay for developments by supplying the demand for the houses. But that's assuming a landlord would be the individual to buy the property.
The issue is just exploting people
i dont think yall know what exploiting means
- Nov 9, 2020
nocommentdo you think thats not possible?
Stay at home in your free fully furnished house, get that trump bucks stimulus cheque, have everything provided for you, ah that's the life
- Nov 9, 2020
its p simple
until the formation of a communist society and the abolishment of the state, the state should oversee housing, especially since it is such a large scale effort
does that mean everyone lives in government housing? no. we already have tons of people occupying houses.
- Nov 9, 2020Dizzy Dake
What's bad about that?
gee i wonder.
- Nov 9, 2020·1 replySynopsis
Yeah, they'd still be making a profit off housing
i dont see how u would not have developers.
Nov 9, 2020·1 replySo basically no one should make any profit beyond their own living expenses
Any dollar beyond what your food, shelter, health cost should go to someone else
right?
Nov 9, 2020·1 replyImagine if it was optional to slave at your job for 40 hours though?
You know how rich people get into all sorts of weird hobbies? They can do so because they have the time. We have to pay to live. When it's in the economy's best interest that we're alive.. - Nov 9, 2020CLB Fractions
i dont think yall know what exploiting means
If you have enough money to control the cost of housing in an area you can force the individuals in that community to only be able to afford to rent the houses.
The more money you have the easier it is for you to do that. Causing a larger wage gap and more discontent within the lower classes. To a point where people are pushing for a capitalistic state.
Nov 9, 2020Dizzy DakeWhat's bad about that?
Why should people need to pay to not be homeless just so you can sit back and count money?
- Nov 9, 2020·1 replyMVP Pinhead
So basically no one should make any profit beyond their own living expenses
Any dollar beyond what your food, shelter, health cost should go to someone else
right?
how do you misrepresent the argument so poorly?
you shouldn't have to worry about spending your money on food shelter and health lmao
Nov 9, 2020FaygoLandlords are definitely in a parasitic relationship with the rest of society. They produce nothing of value themselves and provide no useful skill, labor, or talent, and get paid an inordinate amount of money just for owning real-estate that they didn’t even help to produce. They give nothing to society and yet take so much.
The landlord takes advantage of the proletariat within every society and must be removed by any and all means necessary. The property of landlords must be removed from their possession by the people in order to enact communal living (https://ktt2.com/my-theory-on-communal-living-92821) Most of your paycheck is taken by the landlord and whenever you falter they take away your basic right to shelter.bro shut your poor ass up communist motherfucker
- Nov 9, 2020·1 replyCLB Fractions
i dont see how u would not have developers.
literally the construction workers build the houses, are you ok?
- Nov 9, 2020
Renters and mommas' boys itt defending their landlords
Nov 9, 2020
dundis
- Nov 9, 2020·1 reply009
Imagine if it was optional to slave at your job for 40 hours though?
You know how rich people get into all sorts of weird hobbies? They can do so because they have the time. We have to pay to live. When it's in the economy's best interest that we're alive.. You can look up the living conditions, life expectancy, and quality of life pre industrial revolution.. think you forgot how far slaving has gotten the world
- Nov 9, 2020·2 repliesSynopsis
how do you misrepresent the argument so poorly?
you shouldn't have to worry about spending your money on food shelter and health lmao
there’s no such thing as a free lunch
- Nov 9, 2020MVP Pinhead
there’s no such thing as a free lunch
Truth
- Nov 9, 2020MVP Pinhead
there’s no such thing as a free lunch
it's not a free lunch, it's just a stimulus cheque every month coming to your free fully furnished house
- Nov 9, 2020·3 repliesSynopsis
literally the construction workers build the houses, are you ok?
the developers pay the construction workers 🤦♂️
- Nov 9, 2020·1 replyCLB Fractions
the developers pay the construction workers 🤦♂️
You're wasting your time he still hasn't replied to me
- Nov 9, 2020·1 replyCLB Fractions
the developers pay the construction workers 🤦♂️
so like i said, the developers could just be the government. youre the one who falsely represented the argument by asking if everyone would live in govt housing
- Nov 9, 2020You Disappoint Me
You can look up the living conditions, life expectancy, and quality of life pre industrial revolution.. think you forgot how far slaving has gotten the world
I didn't forget s*** lmao. I just don't think we need that in 2020 especially not regular citizens.
- Nov 9, 2020·2 repliesYou Disappoint Me
You're wasting your time he still hasn't replied to me
I did reply to you, you f***ing idiot.
its a simple ass concept lmfao. yes, a house is more than a shelter, but a house still remains a shelter. why is this hard to understand?
And if you want to use the cave argument (because you're an idiot), then its p simple, again.
everyone is, by the simple fact they are a human being, entitled to a minimum standard of living, so that includes a home, roof over their head, four walls, up to date in terms of safety etc.,