Stock market gives the average person to multiply their money and have greater opportunities to build their portfolios through various indexes
The average person has net negative worth. i.e. they have no money. You are speaking from an incredibly privileged position and are disconnected from the struggles of the average person due to who gave birth to you.
Stock market gives the average person to multiply their money and have greater opportunities to build their portfolios through various indexes
Nice. I like the idea that it gives people financial freedom, why do you think people are opposed to this then?
Because the broke communist niggas always come in here on some bullshit about Capitalism
Like Communism has ever worked once
also the New Deal and Eisenhower’s policies were extremely socialist
It's true. The stock market is mostly held by the top 1% of the population (I think they own somewhere about 95% of the market?) but how about instead of abolishing it, we just tax at more appropriate rates.
And retail investors got more access a lot more recently so you'd see a gradual shift in the ownership
But the increased tax is crucial
also the New Deal and Eisenhower’s policies were extremely socialist
Socialism ≠ Communism
Nice. I like the idea that it gives people financial freedom, why do you think people are opposed to this then?
I don't know
And i brought mine up to show that the Western Allies did the exact same thing in conceding territory (that wasn’t even theirs) to the Germans
But they're not equivalent though. The West did it to appease Hitler and to create a bulwark against Communism.
The Soviets did it to buy time to prepare for a war with Germany that was inevitable.
Stock market gives the average person to multiply their money and have greater opportunities to build their portfolios through various indexes
the average person does not makes use of the stock market, and the money in the stock market should instead go to actual workers to secure their own livelihoods
The average person has net negative worth. i.e. they have no money. You are speaking from an incredibly privileged position and are disconnected from the struggles of the average person due to who gave birth to you.
You're not wrong buddy
“If we see that Germany is winning the war, we ought to help Russia; and if that Russia is winning, we ought to help Germany, and in that way let them kill as many as possible.” - Harry Truman
But they're not equivalent though. The West did it to appease Hitler and to create a bulwark against Communism.
The Soviets did it to buy time to prepare for a war with Germany that was inevitable.
And that is exactly why we cannot call the USSR allies of the Nazis
When a capitalist country fails it not cuz of capitalism but when a socialist country fails it cuz of socialism 1!!
You're not wrong buddy
Glad to see you admit fault. Its a rare quality.
Because the broke communist niggas always come in here on some bullshit about Capitalism
Like Communism has ever worked once
but this time bro if we just let them make the government even bigger and put in the right people in power that they get to choose, they won't get power-hungry and corrupt
surely these same people obsessed with monitoring twitter for speech won't use that power and let it go to their head the moment they get it. surely they will do the right thing. if history has taught us anything!
When a capitalist country fails it not cuz of capitalism but when a socialist country fails it cuz of socialism 1!!
What capitalist country failed
Stock market gives the average person to multiply their money and have greater opportunities to build their portfolios through various indexes
finally the amazon warehouse worker can multiply his 7 dollars an hour he is making on a huge risk.
Or if he invests it into fonds he can just wait 50 years for it to be worth 14 dollars now
He brought up the USSR fighting Nazis as a good thing as if they didnt invade poland with the Nazis
If anything Western Powers are responisble for the Nazis, from the treaty of Versailles to appeasement under Chamberlain, World War II was the love child of capitalism
nobody cares about rhetoric bro
Oil has nothing to do with a country being mighty unless you’re looking at it from a slimy neoliberal perspective where economic control over resources makes one “better” because they have power over others
Cuba is a more mighty country than the USA
OIL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A COUNTRY BEING MIGHTY